Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6237))

Abstract

While isomorphism of knowledge representation has been recognized as important, particularly to maintenance in legal knowledge representation, the requirements of the maintenance process in general get less attention. Traceability from knowledge resources used in the organization to the sources of law used in their production is a central maintenance issue in administrative organizations. This paper explores a mediating knowledge representation for reconstruction of traces to sources of law and to implementation knowledge resources, that should be helpful for analysis of the impact of changing sources of law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bench-Capon, T., Coenen, F.: Exploiting isomorphism: development of a KBS to support British coal insurance claims. In: Sergot, M. (ed.) Proceedings of the third International Conference on AI and Law, pp. 62–69. ACM, New York (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bench-Capon, T., Gordon, T.F.: Isomorphism and argumentation. In: ICAIL 2009: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 11–20. ACM, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boer, A., van Engers, T.: Agile: From source of law to business process specification. In: Casellas, N., Francesconi, E., Hoekstra, R., Montemagni, S. (eds.) LOAIT 2009: 3rd Workshop on Legal Ontologies and Artificial Intelligence Techniques joint with 2nd Workshop on Semantic Processing of Legal Text, Barcelona, Spain, IDT-UAB. IDT Series, vol. 2, pp. 27–44 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Janssen, M.: Adaptability and accountability of information architectures in interorganizational networks. In: ICEGOV 2007: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Theory and practice of electronic governance, pp. 57–64. ACM, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gong, Y., Janssen, M., Overbeek, S., Zuurmond, A.: Enabling flexible processes by eca orchestration architecture. In: ICEGOV 2009: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, pp. 19–26. ACM, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boer, A., Winkels, R., Vitali, F.: Metalex XML and the Legal Knowledge Interchange Format. In: Sartor, G., Casanovas, P., Casellas, N., Rubino, R. (eds.) Computable Models of the Law. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4884, pp. 21–41. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Boer, A., Vitali, F., de Maat, E.: CEN Workshop Agreement on MetaLex XML, an open XML Interchange Format for Legal and Legislative Resources (CWA 15710). Technical report, European Committee for Standardization, CEN (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Breuker, J., Hoekstra, R.: Core concepts of law: taking common-sense seriously. In: Proceedings of Formal Ontologies in Information Systems, FOIS 2004, pp. 210–221. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Breuker, J.: A suite of problem types. In: Breuker, J., de Velde, W.V. (eds.) CommonKADS Library for Expertise Modelling, pp. 57–88. IOS Press/Ohmsha, Amsterdam/Tokyo (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Scarantino, A.: Affordances explained. Philosophy of Science 70(5), 949–961 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Boer, A.: Legal Theory, Sources of Law, & the Semantic Web. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, p. 195. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Boer, A.: Metalex naming conventions and the semantic web. In: Governatori, G. (ed.) Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, pp. 31–36. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Saur, K.G.: Functional requirements for bibliographic records. UBCIM Publications - IFLA Section on Cataloguing 19 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Governatori, G., Rotolo, A.: Changing legal systems: legal abrogations and annulments in Defeasible Logic. Logic Jnl IGPL, jzp075 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Boer, A.: Using event descriptions for metadata about legal documents. In: Winkels, R., Francesconi, E. (eds.) Electronic Proceedings of the Workshop on Standards for Legislative XML, in conjunction with Jurix 2007 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. MacCormick, N.: Norms, institutions, and institutional facts. Law and Philosophy 17(3), 301–345 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hindriks, F.A.: Rules & Institutions; essays in meaning, speech and social ontology. PhD thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Boella, G., Pigozzi, G., van der Torre, L.: Five guidelines for normative multiagent systems. In: Proceeding of the 2009 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, pp. 21–30. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Glimm, B., Horridge, M., Parsia, B., Patel-Schneider, P.F.: A syntax for rules in owl 2. In: OWL Experiences and Directions (OWLED 2009), Washington D.C., USA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Halaschek-Wiener, C., Katz, Y., Parsia, B.: Belief base revision for expressive description logics. In: Online Proceedings of the Second OWL: Experiences and Directions Workshop (OWLED), Athens, Georgia, USA (2006), http://owl-workshop.man.ac.uk/accepted06.shtml

  21. Prakken, H., Sartor, G.: On the relation between legal language and legal argument: assumptions, applicability and dynamic priorities. In: ICAIL 1995: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, pp. 1–10. ACM, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kowalski, R.A., Toni, F.: Abstract argumentation. Artificial Intelligence and Law 4, 275–296 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Borgo, S., Guarino, N., Masolo, C.: Stratified ontologies: The case of physical objects. In: Proceedings of the ECAI 1996 Workshop on Ontological Engineering (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Smith, B.: An essay in formal ontology. Grazer Philosophische Studien 6, 39–62 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Boella, G., van der Torre, L.W.N.: Regulative and constitutive norms in normative multiagent systems. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Whistler, CA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mazzarese, T.: Towards the semantics of “constitutive” in judicial reasoning. Ratio Iuris 12, 252–262 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Boella, G., van der Torre, L.W.N.: Obligations as social constructs. In: AI*IA, pp. 27–38 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Siena, A., Mylopoulos, J., Perini, A., Susi, A.: From laws to requirements. Requirements Engineering and Law, 6–10 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Governatori, G., Sadiq, S.: The journey to business process compliance. In: Handbook of Research on BPM, pp. 426–454. IGI Global (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fikes, R., Hayes, P., Horrocks, I.: Owl-ql–a language for deductive query answering on the semantic web. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 2(1), 19–29 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Horridge, M., Parsia, B., Sattler, U.: Laconic and precise justifications in owl. In: Sheth, A.P., Staab, S., Dean, M., Paolucci, M., Maynard, D., Finin, T., Thirunarayan, K. (eds.) ISWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5318, pp. 323–338. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Boer, A., van Engers, T., Winkels, R. (2010). Traceability and Change in Legal Requirements Engineering. In: Casanovas, P., Pagallo, U., Sartor, G., Ajani, G. (eds) AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems. Complex Systems, the Semantic Web, Ontologies, Argumentation, and Dialogue. AICOL 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6237. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16524-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16524-5_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16523-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16524-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics