Skip to main content

Mapping of Core Components Based e-Business Standards into Ontology

  • Conference paper
Metadata and Semantic Research (MTSR 2010)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 108))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A mapping of Core Components specification based e-business standards to an ontology is presented. The Web Ontology Language (OWL) is used for ontology development. In order to preserve the existing hierarchy of the standards, an emphasis is put on the mapping of Core Components elements to specific constructs in OWL. The main purpose of developing an e-business standards’ ontology is to create a foundation for an automated mapping system that would be able to convert concepts from various standards in an independent fashion. The practical applicability and verification of the presented mappings is tested on the mapping of Universal Business Language version 2.0 and Cross Industry Invoice version 2.0 to OWL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albuquerque, M.O., Siqueira, S.V.M., Lanzelotte, R.S.G., Braz, M.H.L.B.: An Ontology for Musical Phonographic Records: Contributing with a Representation Model, Best Practices for the Knowledge Society. In: Knowledge, Learning, Development and Technology for All, vol. 49, pp. 495–502. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Athanasiadis, I.N., Rizzoli, A.E., Janssen, S., Andersen, E., Villa, F.: Ontology for Seamless Integration of Agricultural Data and Models, Metadata and Semantic Research, vol. 46, pp. 282–293. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Caracciolo, C., Heguiabehere, J., Sini, M., Keizer, J.: Networked Ontologies from the Fisheries Domain. In: Metadata and Semantic Research, vol. 46, pp. 306–311. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology Matching. Springer, New York (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. GS1: GS1 XML, http://www.gs1.org/ecom/xml

  6. Liegl, P.: Business Documents for Inter-Organizational Business Processes, Ph.D. Thesis, Vienna University of Technology (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lowe, B.: DataStaR: Bridging XML and OWL in Science Metadata Management. In: Metadata and Semantic Research, vol. 46, pp. 141–150. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Kalfoglou, Y., Schorlemmer, M.: Ontology mapping: the state of the art. The Knowledge Engineering Review 18(1), 1–31 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Nagypal, G., Lemcke, J.: A business data ontology. Deliverables of project: Service Ontologies and Service Description (2004), http://dip.semanticweb.org/documents/D3.3-Business-data-ontology.pdf

  10. Noy, N.F.: Semantic integration: a survey of ontology-based approaches. ACM SIGMOD Record 33 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. OAGi: OAGIS 9.X, http://www.oagi.org/

  12. OASIS: UBL-Naming and Design Rules-2.0, UBL, http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/10323/cd-UBL-NDR-1.0Rev1c.pdf

  13. OASIS: Universal Business Language (UBL) Naming and Design Rules 2.0, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ubl/os-UBL-2.0/UBL-2.0.html

  14. OWL API, http://owlapi.sourceforge.net

  15. UN/CEFACT: Core Components Technical Specification ver.2.01 - Part 8 of the ebXML Framework, http://www.unece.org/cefact/ebxml/CCTS_V2-01_Final.pdf

  16. UN/CEFACT: Cross Industry Invoice Version 2.0, http://www1.unece.org/cefact/platform/display/TBG/Cross+Industry+Invoice+Process

  17. UN/CEFACT: UNCEFACT+XML+NDR+V3p0, http://www.unece.org/cefact/xml/UNCEFACT+XML+NDR+V3p0.pdf

  18. UN/CEFACT: XML-Naming-and-Design-Rules-V2.0, http://www.unece.org/cefact/xml/XML-Naming-and-Design-Rules-V2.0.pdf

  19. Wache, H., Voegele, T., Visser, U., Stuckenschmidt, H., Schuster, G., Neumann, H., Huebner, S.: Ontology-Based Integration of Information - A Survey of Existing Approaches. In: Proc. of IJCAI 2001 Workshops: Ontologies and Information sharing, pp. 108–117 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yarimagan, Y., Dogac, A.: A Semantic-Based Solution for UBL Schema Interoperability. In: IEEE Internet Computing, pp. 64–71 (May 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Xu, Z., Ni, Y., Lin, L., Gu, H.: A Semantics-Preserving Approach for Extracting OWL Ontologies from UML Class Diagrams. In: Database Theory and Application, vol. 64, pp. 122–136. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Magdalenić, I., Vrdoljak, B., Schatten, M. (2010). Mapping of Core Components Based e-Business Standards into Ontology. In: Sánchez-Alonso, S., Athanasiadis, I.N. (eds) Metadata and Semantic Research. MTSR 2010. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 108. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16552-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16552-8_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16551-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16552-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics