Skip to main content

Increasing Users’ Trust on Personal Assistance Software Using a Domain-Neutral High-Level User Model

  • Conference paper
Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification, and Validation (ISoLA 2010)

Abstract

People delegate tasks only if they trust the one that is going to execute them, who can be a person or a system. Current approaches mostly focus on creating methods (elicitation approaches or learning algorithms) that aim at increasing the accuracy of (internal) user models. However, the existence of a chance of a method giving a wrong answer decreases users’ trust on software systems, thus preventing the task delegation. We aim at increasing users’ trust on personal assistance software based on agents by exposing a high-level user model to users, which brings two main advantages: (i) users are able to understand and verify how the system is modeling them (transparency); and (ii) it empowers users to control and make adjustments on their agents. This paper focuses on describing a domain-neutral user metamodel, which allows instantiating high-level user models with configurations and preferences. In addition, we present a two-level software architecture that supports the development of systems with high-level user models and a mechanism that keeps this model consistent with the underlying implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Weiss, G. (ed.): Multiagent systems: a modern approach to distributed artificial intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Maes, P.: Agents that reduce work and information overload. Commun. ACM 37(7), 30–40 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schiaffino, S., Amandi, A.: User - interface agent interaction: personalization issues. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 60(1), 129–148 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pohl, K., Böckle, G., van der Linden, F.J.: Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations, Principles and Techniques. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Kang, K., Cohen, S., Hess, J., Novak, W., Peterson, A.S.: Feature-oriented domain analysis (FODA) feasibility study. Technical Report CMU/SEI-90-TR-021, SEI (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Keeney, R.L.: Value-focused thinking – A Path to Creative Decisionmaking. Harvard University Press, London (1944)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Doyle, J.: Prospects for preferences. Computational Intelligence 20, 111–136 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Nunes, I., Barbosa, S., Lucena, C.: Modeling user preferences into agent architectures: a survey. Technical Report 25/09, PUC-Rio, Brazil (September 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kästner, C., Apel, S.: Virtual separation of concerns - a second chance for preprocessors. Journal of Object Technology 8(6), 59–78 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Agrawal, R., Wimmers, E.L.: A framework for expressing and combining preferences. In: 2000 ACM SIGMOD, pp. 297–306 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Boutilier, C., Brafman, R.I., Hoos, H.H., Poole, D.: Cp-nets: A tool for representing and reasoning with conditional ceteris paribus preference statements. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 21, 135–191 (2004)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Lang, J., van der Torre, L.: From belief change to preference change. In: ECAI 2008, The Netherlands, pp. 351–355. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ayres, L., Furtado, V.: Owlpref: Uma representação declarativa de preferências para web semântica. In: XXVII Congresso da SBC, Brazil, pp. 1411–1419 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tapucu, D., Can, O., Bursa, O., Unalir, M.O.: Metamodeling approach to preference management in the semantic web. In: M-PREF, USA, pp. 116–123 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Berry, P., Peintner, B., Conley, K., Gervasio, M., Uribe, T., Yorke-Smith, N.: Deploying a personalized time management agent. In: AAMAS 2006, pp. 1564–1571 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Berry, P.M., Donneau-Golencer, T., Duong, K., Gervasio, M., Peintner, B., Yorke-Smith, N.: Evaluating user-adaptive systems: Lessons from experiences with a personalized meeting scheduling assistant. In: IAAI 2009, pp. 40–46 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nunes, I., Barbosa, S.D.J., de Lucena, C.J.P. (2010). Increasing Users’ Trust on Personal Assistance Software Using a Domain-Neutral High-Level User Model. In: Margaria, T., Steffen, B. (eds) Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification, and Validation. ISoLA 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6415. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16558-0_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16558-0_40

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16557-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16558-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics