Skip to main content

Towards Using Semantic Decision Tables for Organizing Data Semantics

  • Conference paper
On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2010 Workshops (OTM 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6428))

Abstract

In the ITEA2 Do-It-Yourself Smart Experiences project (DIY-SE), we are required to design an ontology-based ambient computing environment to support users to DIY their personalized solutions. In this paper, we illustrate how to manage data semantics using Semantic Decision Table (SDT). We use a simple rule writing language called Decision Commitment Language (DECOL) to store the SDT commitments. Semantic Decision Rule Language (SDRule-L), which is an extension to Object Role Modelling (ORM), is used to graphically represent DECOL. In this paper, we will demonstrate how SDT, together with SDRule-L and DECOL, are used by both technical and non-technical end users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aitken, S., Korf., R., Webber, B., Bard, J.: CoBrA: a Bio-Ontology Editor, PMID: 15513995 (2005), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15513995

  2. Chen, G., Vanthienen, J., Wets, G.: Using Fuzzy Decision Tables to build valid intelligent systems. In: Sixth International Fuzzy Systems Association World Congress (IFSA 1995), Sao Paulo, Brazil, July 22-28 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Frauenfelder, M.: Made by Hand: Searching for Meaning in a Throwaway World. Portfolio Hardcover (2010) ISBN-10: 1591843324, ISBN-13:978-1591843320

    Google Scholar 

  4. Curland, M., Halpin, T.: Model Driven Development with NORMA. In: Proc. 40th Int. Conf. on System Sciences (HICSS-40). CD-ROM, p. 10. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Halpin, T.A.: Information Modelling and Relational Databases: From Conceptual Analysis to Logical Design. Morgan Kaufman Publishers, San Francisco (2001) ISBN-13: 978-1-55860-672-2, ISBN-10: 1-55860-672-6

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hewett, R., Leuchner, J.H.: The Power of Second-Order Decision Tables. In: Grossman, R.L., Han, J., Kumar, V., Mannila, H., Motwani(eds, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the Second SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM 2002), Arlington, VA, USA, April 11-13. SIAM (2002) ISBN: 490-89871-517-2

    Google Scholar 

  7. Henry Beitz, E., Buck, N.H., Jorgensen, P.C., Larson, L., Maes, R., Marselos, N.L., Muntz, C., Rabin, J., Reinwald, L.T., Verhelst, M.: A modern appraisal of decision tables, a Codasyl report. ACM, New York (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lukichev, S., Jarrar, M.: Graphical Notations for Rule Modelling. In: Giurca, A., Gasevic, D., Taveter, K. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Emerging Rule-based Languages and Technologies: open solutions and approaches, vol. I, pp. 76–98. Information Science Reference,IGI Global (2009) ISBN978-1-60566-402-6

    Google Scholar 

  9. Noy, N.F., McGuinness, D.L.: Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. Technical Report KSL-01-05, Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Spyns, P., Tang, Y., Meersman, R.: An Ontology Engineering Methodology for DOGMA. In: Guizzardi, G., Halpin, T. (eds.) Journal of Applied Ontology, special issue on Ontological Foundations for Conceptual Modeling, vol. 3(1-2), pp. 13–39 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tang, Y.: Semantic Decision Tables - A New, Promising and Practical Way of Organizing Your Business Semantics with Existing Decision Making Tools. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing AG & Co., Saarbrucken (2010) ISBN 978-3- 8383-3791-3

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tang, Y., Meersman, R.: SDRule Markup Language: Towards Modelling and Interchanging Ontological Commitments for Semantic Decision Making. In: Giurca, A., Gasevic, D., Taveter K. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Emerging Rule-based Languages and Technologies: Open Solutions and Approaches, vol. I, pp. 99–123. Information Science Reference, IGI Global (2009) ISBN978-1-60566-402-6

    Google Scholar 

  13. Trog, D., Vereecken, J., Christiaens, S., De Leenheer, P., Meersman, R.: T-Lex: a Role-based Ontology Engineering Tool. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM 2006 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 4278, pp. 1191–1200. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Wets, G., Witlox, F., Timmermans, H., Vanthienen, J.: A Fuzzy Decision Table Approach for Business Site Selection. In: The Fifth IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, September 8-11, vol. 3, pp. 1605–1610 (1996) ISBN 0-7803-3645-3

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tang, Y. (2010). Towards Using Semantic Decision Tables for Organizing Data Semantics. In: Meersman, R., Dillon, T., Herrero, P. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2010 Workshops. OTM 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6428. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16961-8_71

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16961-8_71

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16960-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16961-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics