Skip to main content

Integrity Constraints in (Conceptual) Database Models

  • Chapter
The Evolution of Conceptual Modeling

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6520))

Abstract

The theory of integrity constraints has led to a large body of knowledge and to many applications such as optimisation of schema behaviour through normalisation to schemata which are easier to maintain, as automatic enforcement of database integrity by triggering or other procedural techniques, as quality improvement of data in databases, and as query recompilations due to the knowledge of validity of constraints in a database. Integrity constraints are often misunderstood, are given in the wrong database context or within the wrong database models, often combine a number of very different facets of semantics in databases and are difficult to specify. At the same time, pearls and hidden treasure of the theory of integrity constraints have been already forgotten.

We develop a unifying approach to specification and treatment of integrity constraints. We survey some pearls, nuggets and lessons learned with semantic models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abiteboul, S., Hull, R., Vianu, V.: Foundations of databases. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bravo, L., Fan, W., Geerts, F., Ma, S.: Increasing the expressivity of conditional functional dependencies without extra complexity. In: ICDE, pp. 516–525. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Biskup, J.: Foundations of information systems. Vieweg, Wiesbaden (1995) (in German)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Beeri, C., Thalheim, B.: Identification as a primitive of database models. In: Proc. FoMLaDO 1998, pp. 19–36. Kluwer, London (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berztiss, A., Thalheim, B.: Exceptions in information systems. In: Digital Libaries: Advanced Methods and Technologies, RCDL 2007, pp. 284–295 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cadiou, J.-M.: On semantic issues in the relational model of data. In: Mazurkiewicz, A. (ed.) MFCS 1976. LNCS, vol. 45, pp. 23–38. Springer, Heidelberg (1976)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Demetrovics, J., Molnár, A., Thalheim, B.: Graphical reasoning for sets of functional dependencies. In: Atzeni, P., Chu, W., Lu, H., Zhou, S., Ling, T.-W. (eds.) ER 2004. LNCS, vol. 3288, pp. 166–179. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Demetrovics, J., Molnar, A., Thalheim, B.: Graphical axiomatisation of sets of functional dependencies in relational databases. In: Alkalmazott Matematikai Lapok, vol. 24, pp. 223–264 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hartmann, S., Hoffmann, A., Link, S., Schewe, K.-D.: Axiomatizing functional dependencies in the higher-order entity-relationship model. Inf. Process. Lett. 87(3), 133–137 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Leonard, M.: Database design theory. MacMillan, Houndsmills (1992)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Link, S.: Consistency enforcement in databases. In: Bertossi, L., Katona, G.O.H., Schewe, K.-D., Thalheim, B. (eds.) Semantics in Databases 2001. LNCS, vol. 2582, pp. 139–159. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Levene, M., Loizou, G.: A guided tour of relational databases and beyond. Springer, Berlin (1999)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Maier, D.: The theory of relational databases. Computer Science Press, Rockville (1983)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Paredaens, J., De Bra, P., Gyssens, M., Van Gucht, D.: The structure of the relational database model. Springer, Berlin (1989)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Thalheim, B.: Open problems in relational database theory. Bull. EATCS 32, 336–337 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thalheim, B.: Dependencies in relational databases. Teubner, Leipzig (1991)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Thalheim, B.: Entity-relationship modeling – Foundations of database technology. Springer, Berlin (2000)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Thalheim, B.: NULL value algebras and logics. In: Proc. EJC 2010, Jyväskylä, pp. 365–376 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tsalenko, M.S.: Modeling of semantics for databases, Nauka, Moscov (1989) (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yang, C.-C.: Relational Databases. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1986)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thalheim, B. (2011). Integrity Constraints in (Conceptual) Database Models. In: Kaschek, R., Delcambre, L. (eds) The Evolution of Conceptual Modeling. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6520. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17505-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17505-3_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-17504-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-17505-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics