Skip to main content

Compound Analytics of Compound Data within RDBMS Framework – Infobright’s Perspective

  • Conference paper
Future Generation Information Technology (FGIT 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6485))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The relational model has been present in research and applications for decades, inspiring a number of RDBMS products based on entirely different architectures, but sharing the same way of understanding and representing the data [4]. Given 40 years of history, it is clear that the relational paradigms should not be blindly followed in all situations [1]. On the other hand, given its popularity, the relational framework is usually the easiest one to accept by database users and the most convenient for interfacing with other tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Agrawal, R., et al.: The Claremont report on database research. SIGMOD Rec. 37(3), 9–19 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Apanowicz, C.: Data Warehouse Discovery Framework: The Case Study. In: Zhang, Y., et al. (eds.) DTA/BSBT 2010. CCIS, vol. 118, pp. 159–170. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Borkowski, J.: Performance debugging of parallel compression on multicore machines. In: Wyrzykowski, R., et al. (eds.) PPAM 2009. LNCS, vol. 6068, pp. 82–91. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Codd, E.F.: Derivability, redundancy and consistency of relations stored in large data banks. SIGMOD Rec. 38(1), 17–36 (2009) (Originally: IBM Research Report RJ599, 1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cuzzocrea, A.: OLAP Data Cube Compression Techniques: A Ten-Year-Long History. In: Kim, T.-h., et al. (eds.) FGIT 2010. LNCS, vol. 6485, pp. 751–754. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Das, S., Chong, E.I., Eadon, G., Srinivasan, J.: Supporting ontology-based semantic matching in RDBMS. In: Proc. of VLDB 2004, pp. 1054–1065. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Frutuoso Barroso, A.R., Baiden, G., Johnson, J.: Knowledge Representation and Expert Systems for Mineral Processing Using Infobright. In: Proc. of GRC 2010, pp. 49–54. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hellerstein, J.M., Stonebraker, M., Hamilton, J.R.: Architecture of a Database System. Foundations and Trends in Databases 1(2), 141–259 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Moss, L.T., Atre, S.: Business Intelligence Roadmap: The Complete Project Lifecycle for Decision-Support Applications. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ślęzak, D., Kowalski, M.: Intelligent Data Granulation on Load: Improving Infobright’s Knowledge Grid. In: Lee, Y.-h., et al. (eds.) FGIT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5899, pp. 12–25. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Ślęzak, D., Kowalski, M.: Towards Approximate SQL – Infobright’s Approach. In: Szczuka, M., et al. (eds.) RSCTC 2010. LNCS, vol. 6086, pp. 630–639. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ślęzak, D., Sosnowski, Ł.: SQL-Based Compound Object Comparators – A Case Study of Images Stored in ICE. In: Kim, T.-h., et al. (eds.) ASEA 2010. CCIS, vol. 117, pp. 304–317. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ślęzak, D., Synak, P., Wróblewski, J., Toppin, G.: Infobright – Analytic Database Engine using Rough Sets and Granular Computing. In: GRC 2010, pp. 432–437. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ślęzak, D., Toppin, G.: Injecting Domain Knowledge into a Granular Database Engine – A Position Paper. In: Proc. of CIKM 2010, pp. 1913–1916. ACM, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ślęzak, D., Wróblewski, J., Eastwood, V., Synak, P.: Brighthouse: An Analytic Data Warehouse for Ad-hoc Queries. PVLDB 1(2), 1337–1345 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Synak, P.: Rough Set Approach to Optimisation of Subquery Execution in Infobright Data Warehouse. In: Proc. of SCKT 2008. PRICAI 2008 Workshop (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wojnarski, M., et al.: Method and System for Data Compression in a Relational Database. US Patent Application 2008/0071818 A1 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ślęzak, D. (2010). Compound Analytics of Compound Data within RDBMS Framework – Infobright’s Perspective. In: Kim, Th., Lee, Yh., Kang, BH., Ślęzak, D. (eds) Future Generation Information Technology. FGIT 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6485. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17569-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17569-5_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-17568-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-17569-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics