Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 265))

Abstract

In Group Decision Making (GDM) the automatic consensus models are guided by different consensus measures which usually are obtained by aggregating similarities observed among experts’ opinions. Most GDM problems based on linguistic approaches use symmetrically and uniformly distributed linguistic term sets to express experts’ opinions.However, there exist problemswhose assessments need to be represented by means of unbalanced linguistic term sets, i.e., using term sets which are not uniformly and symmetrically distributed. The aim of this paper is to present different Linguistic OWA Operators to compute the consensus measures in consensusmodels for GDMproblems with unbalanced fuzzy linguistic information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bezdek, J., Spillman, B., Spillman, R.: Fuzzy measures of preferences and consensus in group decision making. In: Proc. 1977 IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, pp. 1303–1309 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bezdek, J., Spillman, B., Spillman, R.: A fuzzy relation space for group decision theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1, 255–268 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bilgiç, T.: Interval–valued preference structures. European Journal of Operational Research 105(1), 162–183 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Cabrerizo, F.J., Alonso, S., Herrera-Viedma, E.: A consensus model for group decision making problems with unbalanced fuzzy linguistic information. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 8(1), 109–131 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, S.J., Hwang, C.L.: Fuzzy multiple attributive decision making: Theory and its applications. Springer, Berlín (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chiclana, F., Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E.: Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 97(1), 33–48 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Chiclana, F., Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E.: A note on the internal consistency of various preference representations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 131(1), 75–78 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Chiclana, F., Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Martínez, L.: A note on the reciprocity in the aggregation of fuzzy preference relations using owa operators. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 137(1), 71–83 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chiclana, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., Alonso, S.: Some induced ordered weighted averaging operators and their use for solving group decision-making problems based on fuzzy preference relations. European Journal of Operational Research 182(1), 383–399 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Chiclana, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Alonso, S., Herrera, F.: Cardinal Consistency of Reciprocal Preference Relations: A Characterization of Multiplicative Transitivity. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 17(1), 14–23 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chiclana, F., Mata, F., Martínez, L., Herrera-Viedma, E., Alonso, S.: Integration of a consistency control module within a consensus model. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge Based Systems 16(1), 35–53 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Cialdini, R.B.: Influence: science and practice, 4th edn. Allyn and Bacon, Boston (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fedrizzi, M., Fedrizzi, M., Marques Pereira, R.A.: On the issue of consistency in dynamical consensual aggregation. In: Bouchon-Meunier, B., Gutierrez-Ros, J., Magdalena, L., Yager, R.R. (eds.) Technologies for Constructing Intelligent Systems 1: Tasks. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, pp. 129–138. Physica-Verlag, Berlin (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fodor, J., Roubens, M.: Fuzzy preference modelling and multicriteria decision support. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Herrera, F., Herrera–Viedma, E.: Linguistic decision analysis: steps for solving decisions problems under linguistic information. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 115, 67–82 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Chiclana, F.: Multiperson decision making based on multiplicative preference relations. European Journal of Operational Research 129, 372–385 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Martínez, L.: A fuzzy linguistic methodology to deal with unbalanced linguistic term sets. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 16(2), 354–370 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Verdegay, J.L.: A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 78(1), 73–87 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Verdegay, J.L.: A linguistic decision process in group decision making. Group Decision and Negotiation 5, 165–176 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Verdegay, J.L.: Direct approach processes in group decision making using linguistic owa operators. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 79, 175–190 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Verdegay, J.L.: A rational consensus model in group decision making using linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 88(1), 31–49 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Verdegay, J.L.: Linguistic measures based on fuzzy coincidence for reaching consensus in group decision making. Int. J. of Approximate Reasoning 16(3-4), 309–334 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Verdegay, J.L.: Choice processes for non-homogeneous group decision making in linguistic setting. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 94, 287–308 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Herrera, F., Martínez, L.: A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 8(6), 746–752 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Herrera, F., Martínez, L.: A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multigranularity hierarchical linguistic contexts in multiexpert decision-making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Part B: Cybernetics 31(2), 227–234 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Herrera-Viedma, E., Alonso, S., Herrera, F., Chiclana, F.: A consensus model for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 15(5), 863–877 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Herrera-Viedma, E., Chiclana, F., Herrera, F., Alonso, S.: A group decision-making model with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B, Cybernetics 37(1), 176–189 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., Chiclana, F.: A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans 32(3), 394–402 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., Chiclana, F., Luque, M.: Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations. European Journal of Operational Research 154(1), 98–109 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Herrera-Viedma, E., López-Herrera, A.G.: A model of information retrieval system with unbalanced fuzzy linguistic information. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 22(11), 1197–1214 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Herrera-Viedma, E., Martínez, L., Mata, F., Chiclana, F.: A consensus support system model for group decision-making problems with multi-granular linguistic preference relations. IEEE Transaction on Fuzzy Systems 13(5), 644–658 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kacprzyk, J.: Group decision making with a fuzzy linguistic majority. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 18, 105–118 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Kacprzyk, J.: On some fuzzy cores and soft consensus measures in group decision making. In: Bezdek, J. (ed.) The Analysis of Fuzzy Information, pp. 119–130. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kacprzyk, J., Fedrizzi, M.: Soft consensus measure for monitoring real consensus reaching processes under fuzzy preferences. Control Cybernet 15, 309–323 (1986)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Kacprzyk, J., Fedrizzi, M.: A soft measure of consensus in the setting of partial (fuzzy) preferences. European Journal of Operational Research 34, 316–323 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Kacprzyk, J., Fedrizzi, M., Nurmi, H.: Group decision making and consensus under fuzzy preferences and fuzzy majority. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 49(1), 21–31 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Kacprzyk, J., Nurmi, H., Fedrizzi, M.: Consensus under fuzziness. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Levrat, E., Voisin, A., Bombardier, S., Bremont, J.: Subjective evaluation of car seat comfort with fuzzy set techniques. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 12(12), 891–913 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mata, F., Martínez, L., Herrera-Viedma, E.: An adaptive consensus support model for group decision making problems in a multi-granular fuzzy linguistic context. IEEE Transaction on Fuzzy Systems 17(2), 279–290 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Marakas, G.H.: Decision Support Systems in the 21th Century, 2nd edn. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Roubens, M.: Fuzzy sets and decision analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 90(2), 199–206 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Saaty, T.L.: The analytic hierarchy process. MacGraw-Hill, New York (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Spillman, B., Bezdek, J., Spillman, R.: Coalition analysis with fuzzy sets. Kybernetes 8, 203–211 (1979)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Spillman, B., Spillman, R., Bezdek, J.: A fuzzy analysis of consensus in small groups. In: Wang, P.P., Chang, S.K. (eds.) Fuzzy Automata and Decision Processes, pp. 331–356. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Tanino, T.: Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 12, 117–131 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Xu, Z.S.: An approach to group decision making based on incomplete linguistic preference relations. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 4(1), 153–160 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Xu, Z.S.: A method for multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information in linguistic setting. Knowledge-Based Systems 20(8), 719–725 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Yager, R.R.: On Ordered Weighted Averaging Aggregation Operators in Multicriteria Decision Making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 18, 183–190 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. Yager, R.R.: Quantifier guided aggregation using OWA operators. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 11(1), 49–73 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Yager, R.R.: Induced aggregation operators. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 137(1), 59–69 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. Yager, R.R., Filev, D.P.: Operations for granular computing: mixing words and numbers. In: Proceedings of the FUZZ-IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, Anchorage, pp. 123–128 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Yager, R.R., Filev, D.P.: Induced ordered weighted averaging operators. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 29(2), 141–150 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Zadeh, L.A.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its applications to approximate reasoning. Part I. Information Sciencies 8(3), 199–249 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  54. Zadeh, L.A.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its applications to approximate reasoning. Part II. Information Sciencies 8(4), 301–357 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  55. Zadeh, L.A.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its applications to approximate reasoning. Part III. Information Sciencies 9(1), 43–80 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  56. Zadeh, L.A.: A computational approach to fuzzy quantifiers in natural languages. Computers and Mathematics with Applications 9(1), 149–184 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Herrera-Viedma, E., Cabrerizo, F.J., Pérez, I.J., Cobo, M.J., Alonso, S., Herrera, F. (2011). Applying Linguistic OWA Operators in Consensus Models under Unbalanced Linguistic Information. In: Yager, R.R., Kacprzyk, J., Beliakov, G. (eds) Recent Developments in the Ordered Weighted Averaging Operators: Theory and Practice. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 265. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17910-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17910-5_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-17909-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-17910-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics