Skip to main content

The Empirical Study of Liquidity Risk and Closed-End Fund Discounts Based on Panel-Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Modeling Risk Management for Resources and Environment in China

Part of the book series: Computational Risk Management ((Comp. Risk Mgmt))

  • 1152 Accesses

Abstract

Within the bounds created by limits to arbitrage and the transaction costs there are many dimensions in which characteristics of CEF shares and its underling portfolios can differ. Both theoretical studies and empirical evidence have shown that liquidity is a factor for capital asset pricing. This paper uses a data-based panel linear regression model to investigate the sensitive analysis of CEF discounts to illiquidity. We find that Chinese CEF discounts and fund spread are significantly and positively affected by illiquidity of fund shares, illiquidity of the market, illiquidity of fund underlying portfolios, and the difference between illiquidity of fund shares and its underlying assets has significantly and positively influence on discounts. Expected and unexpected illiquidity of fund shares are significantly and positively associated with discounts and fund spread. To some extent, these relations between illiquidity and discounts may explain the high volatility of Chinese CEF discounts. Discounts contain liquidity risk premium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen F, Gale D (1994) Limited market participation and volatility of asset prices. Am Econ Rev 84:933–955

    Google Scholar 

  • Amihud Y (2002) Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects. J Finance 5:31–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan MJ, Subrahmanyam A (1996) Market microstructure and asset pricing: on the compensation for illiquidity in stock returns. J Finance Econ 41:441–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan MJ, Chordia T, Subrahmanyam A (1998) Alternative factor specification, security characteristics, and the cross-section of expected stock returns. J Finance Econ 49:345–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyle AS (1985) Continuous auctions and insider trading. Econometrica 53:1315–1335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee C, Shleifer A, Thaler R (1991) Investor sentiment and the closed-end fund puzzle. J Finance 46:75–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malkiel BG (1977) The valuation of closed-end investment-company shares. J Finance 32:847–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor L, Stambaugh RF (2003) Liquidity risk and expected stock returns. J Pol Econ 111:642–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pontiff J (1997) Excess volatility and closed-end funds. Am Econ Rev 87:155–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss K (1989) The post-offering price performance of close-end funds. Finance Manage 18(3):57–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenbin Huang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Huang, W. (2011). The Empirical Study of Liquidity Risk and Closed-End Fund Discounts Based on Panel-Data. In: Wu, D., Zhou, Y. (eds) Modeling Risk Management for Resources and Environment in China. Computational Risk Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18387-4_43

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics