Skip to main content

Segmentation via NCuts and Lossy Minimum Description Length: A Unified Approach

  • Conference paper
Computer Vision – ACCV 2010 (ACCV 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 6494))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We investigate a fundamental problem in computer vision: unsupervised image segmentation. During the last decade, the Normalized Cuts has become very popular for image segmentation. NCuts guarantees a globally optimal solution in the continuous solution space, however, how to automatically select the number of segments for a given image is left as an open problem. Recently, the lossy minimum description length (LMDL) criterion has been proposed for segmentation of images. This criterion can adaptively determine the number of segments, however, as the optimization is combinatorial, only a suboptimal solution can be achieved by a greedy algorithm. The complementarity of both criteria motivates us to combine NCuts and LMDL into a unified fashion, to achieve a better segmentation: given the NCuts segmentations under different numbers of segments, we choose the optimal segmentation to be the one that minimizes the overall coding length, subject to a given distortion. We then develop a new way to use the coding length decrement as the similarity measure for NCuts, so that our algorithm is able to seek both the optimal NCuts solution under fixed number of segments, and the optimal LMDL solution among different numbers of segments. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Duda, R., Hart, P., Stork, D.: Pattern Classification. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (2001) 0-471-05669-3

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Comaniciu, D., Meer, P.: Mean shift: A robust approach toward feature space analysis. PAMI 24, 603–619 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Felzenszwalb, P.F., Huttenlocher, D.P.: Efficient graph-based image segmentation. IJCV 59, 167–181 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ren, X., Fowlkes, C., Malik, J.: Learning probabilistic models for contour completion in natural images. IJCV 77, 47–63 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Malik, J., Belongie, S., Leung, T.K., Shi, J.: Contour and texture analysis for image segmentation. IJCV 43, 7–27 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhu, S.C., Tu, Z.W.: Image segmentation by data-driven markov chain monte carlo. PAMI II, 131–138 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chung, F.R.K.: Spectral graph theory. Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, vol. 92, pp. 1–212. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Shi, J., Malik, J.: Normalized cuts and image segmentation. PAMI 22, 888–905 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yu, S.X., Shi, J.B.: Multiclass spectral clustering. In: ICCV, pp. 313–319 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cour, T., Benezit, F., Shi, J.B.: Spectral segmentation with multiscale graph decomposition. In: CVPR, vol. II, pp. 1124–1131 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kim, T.H., Lee, K.M., Lee, S.U.: Learning full pairwise affinities for spectral segmentation. In: CVPR (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ma, Y., Derksen, H., Hong, W., Wright, J.: Segmentation of multivariate mixed data via lossy data coding and compression. PAMI 29, 1546–1562 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang, A.Y., Wright, J., Ma, Y., Sastry, S.S.: Unsupervised segmentation of natural images via lossy data compression. CVIU 110, 212–225 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rao, S.R., Mobahi, H., Yang, A.Y., Sastry, S.S., Ma, Y.: Natural image segmentation with adaptive texture and boundary encoding. In: Zha, H., Taniguchi, R.-i., Maybank, S. (eds.) ACCV 2009. LNCS, vol. 5994, pp. 135–146. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Mobahi, H., Rao, S.R., Yang, A.Y., Sastry, S.S., Ma, Y.: Segmentation of natural images by texture and boundary compression. In: arXiv:1006.3679v1 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bagon, S., Boiman, O., Irani, M.: What is a good image segment? A unified approach to segment extraction. In: Forsyth, D., Torr, P., Zisserman, A. (eds.) ECCV 2008, Part IV. LNCS, vol. 5305, pp. 30–44. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Arbelaez, P., Maire, M., Fowlkes, C., Malik, J.: From contours to regions: An empirical evaluation. In: CVPR, pp. 2294–2301 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ren, X.F., Malik, J.: Learning a classification model for segmentation. In: ICCV, pp. 10–17 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ren, X.F., Fowlkes, C.C., Malik, J.: Scale-invariant contour completion using conditional random fields. In: ICCV, vol. II, pp. 1214–1221 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mori, G.: Guiding model search using segmentation. In: ICCV (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Martin, D., Fowlkes, C., Tal, D., Malik, J.: A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and measuring ecological statistics. In: ICCV, vol. 2, pp. 416–423 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shotton, J., Winn, J., Rother, C., Criminisi, A.: Textonboost: Joint appearance, shape and context modeling for multi-class object recognition and segmentation. In: Leonardis, A., Bischof, H., Pinz, A. (eds.) ECCV 2006. LNCS, vol. 3951, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Rand, W.M.: Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods. American Statistical Association Journal 66, 846–850 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Meila, M.: Comparing clusterings: An axiomatic view. In: ICML (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jiang, M., Li, C., Feng, J., Wang, L. (2011). Segmentation via NCuts and Lossy Minimum Description Length: A Unified Approach. In: Kimmel, R., Klette, R., Sugimoto, A. (eds) Computer Vision – ACCV 2010. ACCV 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6494. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19318-7_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19318-7_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-19317-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-19318-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics