Skip to main content

What Kind of Strategies Does a Document Examiner Take in Handwriting Identification?

  • Conference paper
Computational Forensics (IWCF 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 6540))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1082 Accesses

Abstract

A document examiner examines handwriting mainly by a qualitative method based on his/her knowledge and experiences. The qualitative examination, compared with the quantitative examination, possesses less objectivity and is believed to be less reliable. However, an examiner’s opinion is, in fact, highly reliable. The knowledge and strategies that a document examiner uses is discussed in this paper. Four kinds of classification experiments where diagram-like 36 handwriting samples written by 6 writers were used as stimuli were done by visual inspection and cluster analysis. Results of the experiments suggested that the examiner utilized his knowledge on writing motion even when the classification target was a diagram drawn by the reconstruction of a handwriting sample.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Srihari, S.N., Cha, S.H., Lee, S.: Individuality of Handwriting. J. Forensic Sci. 47, 856–872 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kam, M., Webstein, J., Conn, R.: Proficiency of Professional Document Examiners in Writer Identification. J. Forensic Sci. 39, 5–14 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kam, M., Fielding, G., Conn, R.: Writer Identification by Professional Document Examiners. J. Forensic Sci. 42, 778–786 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kam, M., Gunmmadidala, K., Fielding, G., Conn, R.: Signature Authentification by Forensic Document Examiners. J. Forensic Sci. 46, 1117–1124 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dyer, A.G., Found, B., Rogers, D.: Visual Attention and Expertise for Forensic signature Analysis. J. Forensic Sci. 51, 1397–1404 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wakahara, K., Kawamura, T., Mitsui, T.: Identification of Handwriting by Personal Computer. Japanese J. Applied Psychol. 12, 13–21 (1987) (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wakahara, K., Kawamura, T., Mitsui, T.: Identification of Handwriting by Personal Computer (2). Japanese J. Applied Psychol. 13, 19–25 (1988) (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Misaki, K., Umeda, M.: Handwriter Identification using Quantitative Features Extracted from Character Patterns. Japanese J. Sci. Technol. Identification 2, 71–77 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Seki, Y. (2011). What Kind of Strategies Does a Document Examiner Take in Handwriting Identification?. In: Sako, H., Franke, K.Y., Saitoh, S. (eds) Computational Forensics. IWCF 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6540. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19376-7_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19376-7_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-19375-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-19376-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics