Skip to main content

Footwear Print Retrieval System for Real Crime Scene Marks

  • Conference paper
Computational Forensics (IWCF 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 6540))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1220 Accesses

Abstract

Footwear impression evidence has been gaining increasing importance in forensic investigation. The most challenging task for a forensic examiner is to work with highly degraded footwear marks and match them to the most similar footwear print available in the database. Retrieval process from a large database can be made significantly faster if the database footwear prints are clustered beforehand. In this paper we propose a footwear print retrieval system which uses the fundamental shapes in shoes like lines, circles and ellipses as features and retrieves the most similar print from a clustered database. Prints in the database are clustered based on outsole patterns. Each footwear print pattern is characterized by the combination of shape features and represented by an Attributed Relational Graph. Similarity between prints is computed using Footwear Print Distance. The proposed system is invariant to distortions like scale, rotation, translation and works well with the partial prints, color prints and crime scene marks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bouridane, A.: Imaging for Forensics and Security: From Theory to Practice. Springer, New York (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. De Chazal, P.D., Flynn, J., Reilly, R.: Automated processing of shoeprint images based on the fourier transform for use in forensic science. IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 341–350 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang, L., Allinson, N.: Automatic shoeprint retrieval system for use in forensic investigations. In: 5th Annual UK Workshop on Computational Intelligence (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pavlou, M., Allinson, N.M.: Automatic extraction and classification of footwear patterns. In: Proc. Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Crookes, D., Bouridane, A., Su, H., Gueham, M.: Following the Footsteps of Others: Techniques for Automatic Shoeprint Classification. In: 2nd NASA/ESA Conference on Adaptive Hardware and Systems (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gueham, M., Bouridane, A., Crookes, D.: Automatic classification of Partial Shoeprints using Advanced Correlation Filters for use in Forensic Science. In: International Conference on Pattern Recognition, pp. 1–4. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dardi, F., Cervelli, F., Carrato, S.: A Texture based Shoe Retrieval System for Shoe Marks of Real Crime Scenes. In: International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing, pp. 384–393. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rui, Y., Huang, T.S., Chang, S.-F.: Image retrieval: Current techniques, promising directions, and open issues. J. Visual Communication and Image Representation 10, 39–62 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nixon, M., Aguado, A.: Feature Extraction and Image Processing. Elsevier Science, Oxford (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hough, P.V.C.: Method and means for recognizing complex patterns, US Patent 3069654 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  11. McLaughlin, R.: Randomized Hough transform: better ellipse detection. IEEE TENCON-Digital Signal Processing Applications, 409–414 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sanfeliu, A., Fu, K.S.: A distance measure between attributed relational graphs for pattern recognition. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 353–362 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rubner, Y., Tomasi, C., Guibas, L.J.: The earth movers distance as a metric for image retrieval. International Journal of Computer Vision 40, 99–121 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Han, J., Kamber, M., Pei, J.: Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Lowe, D.G.: Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision 40, 91–110 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tang, Y., Srihari, S.N., Kasiviswanathan, H., Corso, J.J. (2011). Footwear Print Retrieval System for Real Crime Scene Marks. In: Sako, H., Franke, K.Y., Saitoh, S. (eds) Computational Forensics. IWCF 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6540. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19376-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19376-7_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-19375-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-19376-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics