Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing ((AINSC,volume 87))

Abstract

Manual construction of ontologies by domain experts and knowledge engineers is an expensive and time consuming task so, automatic and/or semi-automatic approaches are needed. Ontology learning looks for identifying ontology elements like non-taxonomic relationships from information sources. These relationships correspond to slots in a frame-based ontology. This article proposes an initial process for semi-automatic extraction of non-taxonomic relationships of ontologies from textual sources. It uses Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques to identify good candidates of non-taxonomic relationships and a data mining technique to suggest their possible best level in the ontology hierarchy. Once the extraction of these relationships is essentially a retrieval task, the metrics of this field like recall, precision and f-measure are used to perform evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, J.: Natural Language Understanding. The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Inc., Redwood City (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Alexiev, V., Breu, M., de Bruijn, J., Fensel, D., Lara, R., Lausen, H.: Information Integration with Ontologies: Experiences from an Industrial Showcase. Wiley, Chichester (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bontcheva, K., Cunningham, H.: The Semantic Web: A New Opportunity and Challenge for Human Language Technology. In: Fensel, D., Sycara, K., Mylopoulos, J. (eds.) ISWC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2870, Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buitelaar, P., Cimiano, P., Magnini, P.: Ontology Learning from Text: Methods. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cimiano, P., Volker, J., Studer, R.: Ontologies on Demand? – A Description of the State-of-the-Art, Applications, Challenges and Trends for Ontology Learning from Text. Information, Wissenschaft und Praxis 57(6-7), 315–320 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dale, R., Moisl, H., Somers, H.L.: Handbook of natural language processing. CRC, Boca Raton (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dellschaft, K., Staab, S.: On how to perform a gold standard based evaluation of ontology learning. In: Cruz, I., Decker, S., Allemang, D., Preist, C., Schwabe, D., Mika, P., Uschold, M., Aroyo, L.M. (eds.) ISWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4273, pp. 228–241. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Girardi, R.: Guiding Ontology Learning and Population by Knowledge System Goals. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Ontology Development, pp. 480–484. INSTIIC, Valence (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gruber, T.R.: Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies used for Knowledge Sharing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies Nº 43, 907–928 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guarino, N., Masolo, C., Vetere, C.: Ontoseek: Content-based Access to the web. IEEE Intelligent Systems 14(3), 70–80 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lehmann, J., Hitzler, P.: A refinement operator based learning algorithm for the alc description logic. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Inductive Logic Programming, Corvallis, pp. 147–160. Springer, Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maedche, A., Staab, S.: Mining non-taxonomic conceptual relations from text. In: Dieng, R., Corby, O. (eds.) EKAW 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1937, pp. 189–202. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Marinho, L., Buza, K.: Folksonomy-Based Collabulary Learning. In: Sheth, A.P., Staab, S., Dean, M., Paolucci, M., Maynard, D., Finin, T., Thirunarayan, K. (eds.) ISWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5318, pp. 261–276. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Sanchez, D., Moreno, A.: Learning non-taxonomic relationships from web documents for domain ontology construction. Data and Knowledge Engineering 64(3), 600–623 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Srikant, R., Agrawal, R.: Mining generalized association rules. In: Proc. of VLDB 1995, pp. 407–419 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Villaverde, J., Persson, A., Godoy, D., Amandi, A.: Supporting the discovery and labeling of non-taxonomic relationships in ontology learning. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(7), 10288–10294 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zongmin, M.: Soft Computing in Ontologies and Semantic Web. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Serra, I., Girardi, R. (2011). Extracting Non-taxonomic Relationships of Ontologies from Texts. In: Corchado, E., Snášel, V., Sedano, J., Hassanien, A.E., Calvo, J.L., Ślȩzak, D. (eds) Soft Computing Models in Industrial and Environmental Applications, 6th International Conference SOCO 2011. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, vol 87. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19644-7_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19644-7_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-19643-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-19644-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics