Abstract
The increasing growth in the use of Hardware Security Modules (HSMs) towards identification and authentication of a security endpoint have raised numerous privacy and security concerns. HSMs have the ability to tie a system or an object, along with its users to the physical world. However, this enables tracking of the user and/or an object associated with the HSM. Current systems do not adequately address the privacy needs and as such are susceptible to various attacks.
In this work, we analyse various security and privacy concerns that arise when deploying such hardware security modules and propose a system that allow users to create pseudonyms from a trusted master public-secret key pair. The proposed system is based on the intractability of factoring and finding square roots of a quadratic residue modulo a composite number, where the composite number is a product of two large primes. Along with the standard notion of protecting privacy of an user, the proposed system offers colligation between seemingly independent pseudonyms. This new property when combined with HSMs that store the master secret key is extremely beneficial to a user, as it offers a convenient way to generate a large number of pseudonyms using relatively small storage requirements.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Trusted computing group (2008), https://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/
TCG: Trusted computing group main specification v1.1 (2001)
Brickell, E., Camenisch, J., Chen, L.: Direct anonymous attestation. In: 11th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security. ACM Press, New York (2004)
TCG: Trusted computing group main specification v1.2 (2007)
Camenisch, J., Lysyanskaya, A.: Dynamic accumulators and application to efficient revocation of anonymous credentials. In: Yung, M. (ed.) CRYPTO 2002. LNCS, vol. 2442, pp. 101–120. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Chaum, D.: Security without identification: transaction systems to make big brother obsolete. Communications of the ACM 28(10), 1030–1044 (1985)
Chaum, D., Evertse, J.H.: A secure and privacy-protecting protocol for transmitting personal information between organizations. In: Odlyzko, A.M. (ed.) CRYPTO 1986. LNCS, vol. 263, pp. 118–167. Springer, Heidelberg (1987)
Chen, L.: Access with pseudonyms. In: Dawson, E., Golic, J. (eds.) Cryptography: Policy and Algorithms 1995. LNCS, vol. 1029, pp. 232–243. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)
Canetti, R., Charikar, M.S., Rajagopalan, S., Ravikumar, S., Sahai, A., Tomkins, A.S.: Non-transferable anonymous credentials. Patent No: 7222362 (2000)
Lysyanskaya, A., Rivest, R.L., Sahai, A., Wolf, S.: Pseudonym systems (extended abstract). In: Heys, H.M., Adams, C.M. (eds.) SAC 1999. LNCS, vol. 1758, pp. 184–199. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Damgard, I.: Payment systems and credential mechanisms with provable security against abuse by individuals. In: Goldwasser, S. (ed.) CRYPTO 1988. LNCS, vol. 403, pp. 328–335. Springer, Heidelberg (1990)
Pointcheval, D.: The composite discrete logarithm and secure authentication. In: Imai, H., Zheng, Y. (eds.) PKC 2000. LNCS, vol. 1751, pp. 113–128. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Chaum, D.: Blind signatures for untraceable payments. In: Advances in Cryptology - CRYPTO 1982, pp. 199–203 (1982)
Blum, L., Blum, M., Shub, M.: A simple unpredictable pseudo random number generator. SIAM J. Computing 15(2), 364–383 (1986)
Chaum, D., Pedersen, T.: Transferred cash grows in size. In: Rueppel, R.A. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1992. LNCS, vol. 658, pp. 390–407. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)
Camenisch, J., Michels, M.: Separability and efficiency for generic group signature schemes. In: Wiener, M. (ed.) CRYPTO 1999. LNCS, vol. 1666, pp. 413–430. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
Franklin, M., Haber, S.: Joint encryption and message-efficient secure computation. In: Stinson, D.R. (ed.) CRYPTO 1993. LNCS, vol. 773, pp. 266–277. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)
Girault, M.: Self-certified public keys. In: Davies, D.W. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1991. LNCS, vol. 547, pp. 490–497. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)
Goldreich, O.: Modern Cryptoraphy, Probabilistic Proofs and Pseudo-randomness. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
Pointcheval, D., Stern, J.: Security proofs for signature schemes. In: Maurer, U.M. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1996. LNCS, vol. 1070, pp. 387–398. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)
Bellare, M., Rogaway, P.: Random oracles are practical: a paradigm for designing efficient protocols. In: ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security 1993, pp. 62–73 (1993)
Poupard, G., Stern, J.: Security analysis of a practical “on the fly” authentication and signature generation. In: Nyberg, K. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1998. LNCS, vol. 1403, pp. 422–436. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pasupathinathan, V., Pieprzyk, J., Wang, H. (2011). Privacy Enhancements for Hardware-Based Security Modules. In: Obaidat, M.S., Filipe, J. (eds) e-Business and Telecommunications. ICETE 2009. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 130. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20077-9_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20077-9_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20076-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20077-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)