Skip to main content

Galois Connections in Axiomatic Aggregation

  • Conference paper
Formal Concept Analysis (ICFCA 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6628))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We investigate the relations between, on the one hand, Galois connections and the related types of maps and, on the other hand, the axiomatic Arrowian approach for the aggregation (or consensus) problem in lattices. In the latter one wants to ”aggregate” n-tuples (n ≥ 2) of elements of a lattice L into an element of this lattice representing their ”consensus”, subject to satisfying some desirable properties. The main axiom is a generalization of Arrow’s [1] independence. The results consist in the characterization of convenient aggregation functions, and especially in impossibility ones when axioms turn to be incompatible. For the many applications of this theory in the domains of social choice or cluster analysis, see, e.g., the book of Day and McMorris [4]. Basic characterizations of Arrowian aggregation functions according to a specific typology of finite lattices are given by Monjardet [10]. They are extended to lattices of Galois maps (or polarized ones, that is maps appearing in Galois connections), then particularized to fuzzy preorders and hierarchical classifications, in Leclerc [7]. A unified presentation is given in Leclerc and Monjardet [8].

An FCA-related representation of Galois maps between two fixed lattices is given in Domenach and Leclerc [5] with the introduction of the so-called ”biclosed” relations. As pointed out in the unifying paper of Ganter [6], the notion of biclosed relations is related to several others in the literature. The first part of the presentation will be devoted to Arrowian aggregation of biclosed relations.

In the second part, we present another relation between Aggregation theory and residuated/residual maps (those appearing in Residuation Theory [2]), which corresponds to ”covariant” Galois connections. Chambers and Miller [3] and Leclerc and Monjardet [9] have recently pointed out that, in a significant class of atomistic lattices, an aggregation function is a meet-projection if and only if it is a residual mapping.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Arrow, K.J.: Social Choice and Individual Values. Wiley, New York (1951)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Blyth, T.S., Janowitz, M.F.: Residuation theory. Pergamon Press, Oxford (1972)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Chambers, C.P., Miller, A.D.: Rules for Aggregating Information. Social Choice and Welfare 36, 75–82 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Day, W.H.E., McMorris, F.R.: Axiomatic Consensus Theory in Group Choice and Biomathematics. SIAM, Philadelphia (2003)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Domenach, F., Leclerc, B.: Biclosed binary relations and Galois connections. Order 18, 89–104 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Ganter, B.: Relational Galois connections. In: Kuznetsov, S.O., Schmidt, S. (eds.) ICFCA 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4390, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Leclerc, B.: Aggregation of fuzzy preferences: a theoretic Arrow-like approach. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 43, 291–309 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Leclerc, B., Monjardet, B.: Latticial theory of consensus. In: Barnett, V., Moulin, H., Salles, M., Schofield, N. (eds.) Social Choice, Welfare and Ethics, pp. 145–159. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leclerc, B., Monjardet, B.: Aggregation and residuation (2011) (submitted)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Monjardet, B.: Arrowian characterizations of latticial federation consensus functions. Mathematical Social Sciences 20, 51–71 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Leclerc, B. (2011). Galois Connections in Axiomatic Aggregation. In: Valtchev, P., Jäschke, R. (eds) Formal Concept Analysis. ICFCA 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6628. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20514-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20514-9_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20513-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20514-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics