Skip to main content

Experimental Evaluation of Peer Endorsement System Artifacts Using Best-of-Breed Ideals – Effects of Online Decision Confidence on Post-choice Regret

  • Conference paper
Service-Oriented Perspectives in Design Science Research (DESRIST 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6629))

  • 4028 Accesses

Abstract

Peer endorsement systems (PES), systems for the collection and presentation of online product reviews represent a new and increasingly common sight on many e-Commerce websites. The number of reviews and scope of data presentation made possible by PESs pose demands on the information processing abilities of a typical customer. This study posits that differences in PES design based on quality and presentation of online customer reviews can impact user perceptions about whether they are getting “the whole story” about a product. Drawing on economic regret theory, we develop a theoretical model to test the impact of PES design on consumer’s decision confidence and post-choice regret. We conduct an expost experimental analysis of two competing PES interfaces and show that key differences in PES design have a surprising and relevant impact on the way in which data from that interface is perceived and used by customers in the online decision-making process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Keller, K.L., Staelin, R.: Effects of quality and quantity of information on decision effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Research 14(2), 200–213 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ho, J., Tang, R.: Towards an optimal resolution to information overload: an infomediary approach. In: Proceedings of the 2001 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, pp. 91–96. ACM, New York (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Liang, T.P., Kai, H.J., Ku, Y.C.: Personalized content recommendation and user satisfaction: Theoretical synthesis and empirical findings. Journal of Management Information System 23(3), 45–70 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ng, V.W.K., Chyi, H.I.: The Effects of Context Clutter and Advertising Repetition on Attitudinal and Behavioral Changes toward an Online Advertisement. Embedding Into Our Lives: New Opportunities and Challenges of the Internet 145 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mudambi, S.M., Schuff, D.: What makes a helpful Online Review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.com. MIS Quarterly 34(1), 185–200 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hu, M., Liu, B.: Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In: Proceedings of the Tenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 168–177. ACM, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hu, N., Pavlou, P., Zhang, J.: Can online reviews reveal a products true quality. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC 2006) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chevalier, J.A., Mayzlin, D.: The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research 43(3), 345–354 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bhattacharjee, S., Gopal, R.D., Lertwachara, K., Marsden, J.R.: Consumer search and retailer strategies in the presence of online music sharing. Journal of Management Information Systems 23(1), 129–159 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Loomes, G., Sugden, R.: Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. The Economic Journal 92(368), 805–824 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bell, D.E.: Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research 30(5), 961–981 (1982)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Tsiros, M., Mittal, V.: Regret: A model of its antecedents and consequences in consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research 26(4), 401–417 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zeelenberg, M.: Anticipated regret, expected feedback and behavioral decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 12(2), 93–106 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Das, N., Kerr, A.H.: ”Woulda, Coulda, Shoulda”: A Conceptual Examination of the Sources of Post-choice Regret. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 18(2), 171–180 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hung, S.Y., Ku, Y.C., Liang, T.P., Lee, C.J.: Regret avoidance as a measure of DSS success: An exploratory study. Decision Support System 42(4), 2093–2106 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Baskerville, R., Pries-Heje, J., Ramesh, B.: The enduring contradictions of new software development approaches: a response to Persistent Problems and Practices in ISD. Information Systems Journal 17(3), 241–245 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. Mis Quarterly 28(1), 75–105 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R., Venable, J.: Strategies for design science research evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Information Systems, pp. 255–266 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kumar, N., Benbasat, I.: Research Note-The Influence of Recommendations and Consumer Reviews on Evaluations of Websites. Information Systems Research 17(4), 425 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McKinney, V., Yoon, et al.: The measurement of web-customer satisfaction: An expectation and disconfirmation approach. Information Systems Research 13(3), 296 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Simonson, I.: The influence of anticipating regret and responsibility on purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Research 19(1), 105–118 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tan, C.H., Yang, X., Teo, H.H., Lin, G.: An Empirical Investigation of the Auction Buyer’s Choice to Buy Out or Bid: Cry of Regret or Laugh of Satisfaction? In: Proceedings of ICIS 2005, vol. 62 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Qin, L., Gulati, A., He, L., Fang, W.: Adverse Selection for Luxury Goods in Online Auctions. Journal of Internet Commerce 8(3), 268–287 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dave, K., Lawrence, S., Pennock, D.M.: Mining the peanut gallery: Opinion extraction and semantic classification of product reviews. Proceedings of the 12th international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 528 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kwaifunip, R., Wagner, C.: Weblogging: A study of social computing and its impact on organizations. Decision Support Systems (45), 242–250 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jiang, Z.: The effects of presentation formats and task complexity on online consumers. MIS Quarterly (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Church, M., Iyer, L. (2011). Experimental Evaluation of Peer Endorsement System Artifacts Using Best-of-Breed Ideals – Effects of Online Decision Confidence on Post-choice Regret. In: Jain, H., Sinha, A.P., Vitharana, P. (eds) Service-Oriented Perspectives in Design Science Research. DESRIST 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6629. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20633-7_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20633-7_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20632-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20633-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics