Skip to main content

On Influence and Contractions in Defeasible Logic Programming

  • Conference paper
Book cover Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (LPNMR 2011)

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the problem of contraction in Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP), a logic-based approach for defeasible argumentation. We develop different notions of contraction based on both, the different forms of entailment implicitly existent in argumentation-based formalisms and the influence literals exhibit in the reasoning process. We give translations of widely accepted rationality postulates for belief contraction to our framework. Moreover we discuss on the applicability of contraction for defeasible argumentation and the role of influence in this matter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alchourrón, C.E., Gärdenfors, P., Makinson, D.: On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions. Journal of Symbolic Logic 50(2), 510–530 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Billington, D., Antoniou, G., Governatori, G., Maher, M.J.: Revising nonmonotonic theories: The case of defeasible logic. In: Burgard, W., Christaller, T., Cremers, A.B. (eds.) KI 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1701, pp. 101–112. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Falappa, M.A., Kern-Isberner, G., Simari, G.R.: Belief revision and argumentation theory. In: Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 341–360. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Garcia, A., Simari, G.R.: Defeasible logic programming: An argumentative approach. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 4(1-2), 95–138 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Hansson, S.O.: Kernel contraction. J. of Symbolic Logic 59, 845–859 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Thimm, M., Kern-Isberner, G.: On the relationship of defeasible argumentation and answer set programming. In: COMMA 2008, pp. 393–404 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

García, D.R. et al. (2011). On Influence and Contractions in Defeasible Logic Programming. In: Delgrande, J.P., Faber, W. (eds) Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning. LPNMR 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6645. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20895-9_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20895-9_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20894-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20895-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics