Skip to main content

Functional Safety Extensions to Automotive SPICE According to ISO 26262

  • Conference paper
Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination (SPICE 2011)

Abstract

The automotive industry is currently focused on feature development to deliver green, safe and connected vehicles. Implementations of these features increase both complexity and function integration in software as well as in electronic hardware. In order to maintain safety in vehicles due to this more complex and integrated environment, the upcoming ISO 26262 functional safety standard will give support. The automotive manufacturers who develop safety related functionality could benefit from using this new ISO standard to address functional safety. One requirement of ISO 26262 is to assess the capability of the development process used to comply with the standard. This paper describes an approach to extend ISO/IEC 15504 and Automotive SPICE to fulfill this ISO 26262 requirement for both software and hardware development. The functional safety extensions can be used together with Automotive SPICE for process assessments of functional safety in the automotive industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ISO/DIS 26262, Road vehicles - Functional safety, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Automotive SPICE Process Reference Model, v4.5, Automotive SIG (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Automotive SPICE Process Assessment Model, v2.5, Automotive SIG (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. ISO/IEC 15504:2006 Information Technology - Process Assessment – Part 5: An exemplar Process Assessment Model. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. +SAFE, A Safety Extension to CMMI-DEV, V1.2, Defence Materiel Organisation. Australian Department of Defence, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. ISO/IEC DTR 15504-10, Information technology – Software process assessment – Part 10: Safety Extensions. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. The CASS Guide to Functional Safety Management Assessment, Issue 2.a. The CASS Scheme Ltd., United Kingdom (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. IEC 61508, Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems. International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland (1998, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Johannessen, P., Halonen, Ö., Örsmark, O. (2011). Functional Safety Extensions to Automotive SPICE According to ISO 26262. In: O’Connor, R.V., Rout, T., McCaffery, F., Dorling, A. (eds) Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination. SPICE 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 155. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21233-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21233-8_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21232-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21233-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics