Skip to main content

Improving Naming and Grouping in UML

  • Conference paper
Modelling Foundations and Applications (ECMFA 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 6698))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 992 Accesses

Abstract

The package is one of the basic UML concepts. It is used both to group model elements and to provide a namescope for its members. However, combining these two tasks into a single UML concept can become not only too restrictive but also a source of subtle problems. This paper presents some improvements to the current UML naming and grouping schemata, using the ideas proposed in the reference model of Open Distributed Processing (ODP). The extensions try to maintain backwards compatibility with the existing UML concepts, while allowing more flexible grouping and naming mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Object Management Group. Unified Modeling Language 2.3 Superstructure Specification (May 2010), OMG doc. formal/2010-05-05

    Google Scholar 

  2. Object Management Group. Architecture Ecosystem Special Interest Group (December 2009), http://www.omgwiki.org/architecture-ecosystem/

  3. Chimiak-Opoka, J.D., Demuth, B., Silingas, D., Rouquette, N.F.: Requirements analysis for an integrated OCL development environment. In: Proc. of the OCL Workshop at MODELS 2009. ECEASST, vol. 24 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zito, A., Diskin, Z., Dingel, J.: Package merge in UML 2: Practice vs. Theory? In: Wang, J., Whittle, J., Harel, D., Reggio, G. (eds.) MoDELS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4199, pp. 185–199. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Dingel, J., Diskin, Z., Zito, A.: Understanding and improving UML package merge. Software and System Modeling 7, 443–467 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. ISO/IEC. RM-ODP. Reference Model for Open Distributed Processing, ISO/IEC 10746, ITU-T Rec. X.901-X.904 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. ISO/IEC. Information technology – Open distributed processing – Use of UML for ODP system specifications, ISO/IEC IS 19793, ITU-T X.906 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. ISO/IEC. Information Technology — Open Distributed Processing — Naming Framework, ISO/IEC IS 14771, ITU-T Rec. X.910 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Object Management Group. Object Constraint Language (OCL) Specification. Version 2.2 (February 2010), OMG doc. formal/2010-02-01

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bernstein, P.A., Pottinger, R.A.: Merging models based on given correspondences. In: Proc. of VLDB 2003, Berlin, Germany, pp. 862–873 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Emerson, M., Sztipanovits, J.: Techniques for metamodel composition. In: Proc. of the Workshop on Domain Specific Modeling at OOPSLA 2006, pp. 123–139 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kolovos, D., Rose, L., Paige, R.: The Epsilon book, U. York (2010), http://www.eclipse.org/gmt/epsilon/doc/book/

  13. van der Linden, R.: The ANSA naming model. Architecture report APM.1003.01, ANSA (July 1993), http://www.ansa.co.uk/ANSATech/93/Primary/100301.pdf

  14. Object Management Group. Semantics of A Foundational Subset For Executable UML Models (fUML). Version 1.0 – Beta 3 (June 2010), OMG doc. ptc/2010-03-14

    Google Scholar 

  15. Casanave, C.: Requirements for Federated Modeling. White paper. Model Driven Solutions (January 2011), http://bit.ly/dUGiVf

  16. Vallecillo, A.: On the combination of domain specific modeling languages. In: Kühne, T., Selic, B., Gervais, M.-P., Terrier, F. (eds.) ECMFA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6138, pp. 305–320. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Vallecillo, A. (2011). Improving Naming and Grouping in UML. In: France, R.B., Kuester, J.M., Bordbar, B., Paige, R.F. (eds) Modelling Foundations and Applications. ECMFA 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6698. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21470-7_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21470-7_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21469-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21470-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics