Skip to main content

Bare Nouns in Predicate Position in French

  • Chapter
Logic and Grammar

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6700))

Abstract

In this paper we examine the differences between bare singular nouns and indefinite singular NPs in predicate position in French. Our claim is that the semantic value of the singular indefinite determiner is not empty in French and that various interpretative contrasts between bare singular nouns and indefinite nouns in predicate position can be accounted for if a distinction between two rules of predication supported by copular sentences is introduced. We assume that bare nouns denote properties, which can be attributed to individuals, while indefinite noun phrases denote entities, which can be identified with an individual in context. This distinction between two types of statements, attributive ones and identificational ones, takes its source in Higgin’s typology, and will be compared with Roy’s and Heller and Wolter’s works on predicative and specificational sentences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beyssade, C., Dobrovie-Sorin, C.: A syntax-based analyis of predication. In: Georgala, E., Howell, J. (eds.) Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 15, pp. 44–61. CLC Publications, Ithaca (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blanche-Benveniste, C.: le français parlé. CNRS Editions (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boone, A.: Les Constructions Il est linguiste/C’est un linguiste. Langue Française 75, 94–106 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chierchia, G.: Formal Semantics and the Grammar of Predication. Linguistics Inquiry 16, 417–443 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Comorovski, I.: Constituent questions and the copula of specification. In: Comorovski, I., von Heusinger, K. (eds.) Existence: Semantics and Syntax, pp. 49–77. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Dummett, M.: Frege. Philosophy of Language. Duckworth (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dummett, M.: The interpretation of Frege’s Philosophy. Duckworth (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fine, K.: Acts, Events, and Things. In: Leinfellner, W., et al. (eds.) Language and Ontology, pp. 97–105 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fox, C.: The Ontology of Language. Properties, Individuals and Discourse. CSLI Publications, Stanford (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Geach, P.T.: Reference and Generality, 3rd edn. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gupta, A.: The Logic of Common Nouns. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Heim, I., Kratzer, A.: Semantics in Generative Grammar. Blackwell, Malden (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Heller, D., Wolter, L.: That is Rosa: Identificational sentences as intensional predication. In: Grønn, A. (ed.) Proceedings of Sinn & Bedeutung 12, Oslo, pp. 226–240 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Heycock, C., Kroch, A.: Pseudocleft Connectedness: Implications for the LF Interface Level. Linguistic Inquiry 30(3), 365–397 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Higgins, R.F.: The Pseudocleft Construction in English. Garland, New York (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kratzer, A.: Stage-Level and Individual-Level Predicates. In: Bach, E., Kratzer, A., Partee, B. (eds.) Papers on Quantification, University of Massachusetts, Amherst (1989); Also published in Carlson G.N., Pelletier, F.J. (eds.) The Generic Book, pp. 125–175. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kupferman, L.: Les Constructions Il est un médecin/C’est un médecin: Essai de solution. Cahiers linguistiques 9 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Laca, B., Tasmovski, L.: Le pluriel indéfini de l’attribut métaphorique. Linguisticae Investigatione XVIII(1), 27–48 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Larson, R.: Olga is a Beautiful Dancer. Presented at the Winter Meetings of the Linguistic Society of American, New Orleans (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Larson, R.: Events and Modification in Nominals. In: Strolovitch, D., Lawson, A. (eds.) Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory VIII, pp. 145–168. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mari, A., Martin, F.: Bare and Indefinites NPs in Predicative Position in French. In: Schäfer, F. (ed.) SinSpec, Working Papers of the SFB 732, vol. 1. University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Matushansky, O., Spector, B.: To be (a) human. Talk given at JSM 2003 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Matushansky, O., Spector, B.: Tinker, tailor, soldier, spy. In: Maier, E., Bary, C., Huitink, J. (eds.) Proceedings of Sinn & Bedeutung 9, pp. 241–255. NCS, Nijmegen (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mc Nally, L., Van Geenhoven, V.: Redefining the weak/strong distinction. Expanded Version of a Paper Presented at the CSSP 1997 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mc Nally, L.: A Semantics for the English Existential Construction. Garland Press, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mikkelsen, L.: Specifying Who: On the Structure, Meaning, and Use of Specificational Copular Clauses. PH. D. Diss., University of California, Santa Cruz (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mikkelsen, L.: Copular clauses. In: von Heusinger, K., Maienborn, C., Portner, P. (eds.) Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Moltmann, F.: Weak Reference or the True Semantics of of Relative Identity Statements, ms (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Moro, A.: There-raising: principles across levels. Presentation at the 1990 Glow colloquium, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Moro, A.: The Raising of Predicates: Predicative Noun Phrases and the Theory of Clause Structure. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Munn, A., Schmitt, C.: Number and indefinites. Lingua 115, 821–855 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Musan, R.: On the Temporal Interpretation of Noun Phrases. MIT dissertation (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Musan, R.: Tense, Predicates, and Lifetime Effects. Natural Language Semantics 5(3), 271–301 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Partee, B.: Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In: Groenendijk, J., de Jongh, D., Stokhof, M. (eds.) Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers, pp. 115–143. Foris, Dordrecht (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pollock, J.-Y.: Sur quelques propriétés des phrases copulatives en français. Langue Française 58, 89–125 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Roodenburg, J.: Pour une approche scalaire de la déficience nominale: la position du français dans une théorie des ’noms nus’. Ph.D. Diss., Utrecht Lot (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Roy, I.: Non verbal predications: a syntactic analysis of copular sentences. Ph.D Diss., USC (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Siegel, E.: Capturing the Adjective. Ph.D. Diss., University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  39. de Swart, H.: Adverbs of quantification. A Generalized Quantifier Approach, Garland (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  40. de Swart, H., Winter, Y., Zwarts, J.: Bare nominals and reference to capacities. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25, 195–222 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. de Swart, H., Zwarts, J.: Less form, more meaning: why bare nominals are special. Ms Nias/Utrecht/Nijmegen (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Szabo, Z.: Adjectives in context. In: Kenesei, I., Harnish, R.M. (eds.) Perspectives on Semantics, Pragmatics, and Discourse, pp. 119–146 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Tamba, I.: Pourquoi dit-on “Ton neveu, il est orgueilleux” et ”Ton neveu, c’est un orgueilleux”. L’information Grammaticale 19, 3–10 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. van Geenhoven, V.: Semantic Incorporation and Indefinite Descriptions: Semantic and Syntactic Aspects of West Greenlandic Noun Incorporation. Ph.D. Diss., Universität Tübingen (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Williams, E.: Pseudoclefts and the order of the logic of English. Linguistic Inquiry 21, 485–489 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Williams, E.: The asymmetry of predication. Texas Linguistic Forum 38, 323–333 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Wolter, L.K.: That’s that : the semantics and pragmatics of demonstrative noun phrases. Ph.D Diss., University of California, Santa Cruz (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beyssade, C. (2011). Bare Nouns in Predicate Position in French. In: Pogodalla, S., Quatrini, M., Retoré, C. (eds) Logic and Grammar. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6700. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21490-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21490-5_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21489-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21490-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics