Abstract
In this paper we examine the differences between bare singular nouns and indefinite singular NPs in predicate position in French. Our claim is that the semantic value of the singular indefinite determiner is not empty in French and that various interpretative contrasts between bare singular nouns and indefinite nouns in predicate position can be accounted for if a distinction between two rules of predication supported by copular sentences is introduced. We assume that bare nouns denote properties, which can be attributed to individuals, while indefinite noun phrases denote entities, which can be identified with an individual in context. This distinction between two types of statements, attributive ones and identificational ones, takes its source in Higgin’s typology, and will be compared with Roy’s and Heller and Wolter’s works on predicative and specificational sentences.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beyssade, C., Dobrovie-Sorin, C.: A syntax-based analyis of predication. In: Georgala, E., Howell, J. (eds.) Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 15, pp. 44–61. CLC Publications, Ithaca (2005)
Blanche-Benveniste, C.: le français parlé. CNRS Editions (1990)
Boone, A.: Les Constructions Il est linguiste/C’est un linguiste. Langue Française 75, 94–106 (1987)
Chierchia, G.: Formal Semantics and the Grammar of Predication. Linguistics Inquiry 16, 417–443 (1985)
Comorovski, I.: Constituent questions and the copula of specification. In: Comorovski, I., von Heusinger, K. (eds.) Existence: Semantics and Syntax, pp. 49–77. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)
Dummett, M.: Frege. Philosophy of Language. Duckworth (1973)
Dummett, M.: The interpretation of Frege’s Philosophy. Duckworth (1981)
Fine, K.: Acts, Events, and Things. In: Leinfellner, W., et al. (eds.) Language and Ontology, pp. 97–105 (1982)
Fox, C.: The Ontology of Language. Properties, Individuals and Discourse. CSLI Publications, Stanford (2000)
Geach, P.T.: Reference and Generality, 3rd edn. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1980)
Gupta, A.: The Logic of Common Nouns. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven (1980)
Heim, I., Kratzer, A.: Semantics in Generative Grammar. Blackwell, Malden (1998)
Heller, D., Wolter, L.: That is Rosa: Identificational sentences as intensional predication. In: Grønn, A. (ed.) Proceedings of Sinn & Bedeutung 12, Oslo, pp. 226–240 (2008)
Heycock, C., Kroch, A.: Pseudocleft Connectedness: Implications for the LF Interface Level. Linguistic Inquiry 30(3), 365–397 (1999)
Higgins, R.F.: The Pseudocleft Construction in English. Garland, New York (1979)
Kratzer, A.: Stage-Level and Individual-Level Predicates. In: Bach, E., Kratzer, A., Partee, B. (eds.) Papers on Quantification, University of Massachusetts, Amherst (1989); Also published in Carlson G.N., Pelletier, F.J. (eds.) The Generic Book, pp. 125–175. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1995)
Kupferman, L.: Les Constructions Il est un médecin/C’est un médecin: Essai de solution. Cahiers linguistiques 9 (1979)
Laca, B., Tasmovski, L.: Le pluriel indéfini de l’attribut métaphorique. Linguisticae Investigatione XVIII(1), 27–48 (1994)
Larson, R.: Olga is a Beautiful Dancer. Presented at the Winter Meetings of the Linguistic Society of American, New Orleans (1995)
Larson, R.: Events and Modification in Nominals. In: Strolovitch, D., Lawson, A. (eds.) Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory VIII, pp. 145–168. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1998)
Mari, A., Martin, F.: Bare and Indefinites NPs in Predicative Position in French. In: Schäfer, F. (ed.) SinSpec, Working Papers of the SFB 732, vol. 1. University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart (2008)
Matushansky, O., Spector, B.: To be (a) human. Talk given at JSM 2003 (2003)
Matushansky, O., Spector, B.: Tinker, tailor, soldier, spy. In: Maier, E., Bary, C., Huitink, J. (eds.) Proceedings of Sinn & Bedeutung 9, pp. 241–255. NCS, Nijmegen (2005)
Mc Nally, L., Van Geenhoven, V.: Redefining the weak/strong distinction. Expanded Version of a Paper Presented at the CSSP 1997 (1998)
Mc Nally, L.: A Semantics for the English Existential Construction. Garland Press, New York (1997)
Mikkelsen, L.: Specifying Who: On the Structure, Meaning, and Use of Specificational Copular Clauses. PH. D. Diss., University of California, Santa Cruz (2004)
Mikkelsen, L.: Copular clauses. In: von Heusinger, K., Maienborn, C., Portner, P. (eds.) Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin (to appear)
Moltmann, F.: Weak Reference or the True Semantics of of Relative Identity Statements, ms (2007)
Moro, A.: There-raising: principles across levels. Presentation at the 1990 Glow colloquium, Cambridge (1990)
Moro, A.: The Raising of Predicates: Predicative Noun Phrases and the Theory of Clause Structure. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)
Munn, A., Schmitt, C.: Number and indefinites. Lingua 115, 821–855 (2005)
Musan, R.: On the Temporal Interpretation of Noun Phrases. MIT dissertation (1995)
Musan, R.: Tense, Predicates, and Lifetime Effects. Natural Language Semantics 5(3), 271–301 (1997)
Partee, B.: Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In: Groenendijk, J., de Jongh, D., Stokhof, M. (eds.) Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers, pp. 115–143. Foris, Dordrecht (1987)
Pollock, J.-Y.: Sur quelques propriétés des phrases copulatives en français. Langue Française 58, 89–125 (1983)
Roodenburg, J.: Pour une approche scalaire de la déficience nominale: la position du français dans une théorie des ’noms nus’. Ph.D. Diss., Utrecht Lot (2004)
Roy, I.: Non verbal predications: a syntactic analysis of copular sentences. Ph.D Diss., USC (2006)
Siegel, E.: Capturing the Adjective. Ph.D. Diss., University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA (1976)
de Swart, H.: Adverbs of quantification. A Generalized Quantifier Approach, Garland (1993)
de Swart, H., Winter, Y., Zwarts, J.: Bare nominals and reference to capacities. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25, 195–222 (2007)
de Swart, H., Zwarts, J.: Less form, more meaning: why bare nominals are special. Ms Nias/Utrecht/Nijmegen (2006)
Szabo, Z.: Adjectives in context. In: Kenesei, I., Harnish, R.M. (eds.) Perspectives on Semantics, Pragmatics, and Discourse, pp. 119–146 (2001)
Tamba, I.: Pourquoi dit-on “Ton neveu, il est orgueilleux” et ”Ton neveu, c’est un orgueilleux”. L’information Grammaticale 19, 3–10 (1983)
van Geenhoven, V.: Semantic Incorporation and Indefinite Descriptions: Semantic and Syntactic Aspects of West Greenlandic Noun Incorporation. Ph.D. Diss., Universität Tübingen (1996)
Williams, E.: Pseudoclefts and the order of the logic of English. Linguistic Inquiry 21, 485–489 (1990)
Williams, E.: The asymmetry of predication. Texas Linguistic Forum 38, 323–333 (1997)
Wolter, L.K.: That’s that : the semantics and pragmatics of demonstrative noun phrases. Ph.D Diss., University of California, Santa Cruz (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Beyssade, C. (2011). Bare Nouns in Predicate Position in French. In: Pogodalla, S., Quatrini, M., Retoré, C. (eds) Logic and Grammar. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6700. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21490-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21490-5_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21489-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21490-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)