Abstract
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are intended for people unable to do any muscular movement such as complete locked-in patients. Most of the BCIs make use of visual interaction with the user, either in form of stimulation or biofeedback. However, visual BCIs challenge the ultimate use of BCIs because they require the subjects to gaze, explore and coordinate the eyes using their muscles, thus ruling out complete locked-in patients. Despite auditory BCIs overcome the problem of the visuals, there are not many examples of them in the BCI literature. In this paper we review the research and main contributions to auditory BCIs, and compare them with visual BCIs, especially to communicate with complete locked-in patients.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Wolpaw, J.R., et al.: Brain–Computer Interface Technology: A Review of the First International Meeting. IEEE Transactions On Rehabilitation Engineering 8(2), 164–173 (2000)
Muller-Putzy, G.R., Pfurtscheller, G.: Control of an Electrical Prosthesis With an SSVEP-Based BCI. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 55(1), 361–364 (2008)
Bakardjian, H., Tanaka, T., Cichocki, A.: Optimization of SSVEP brain responses with application to eight-command Brain–Computer Interface. Neuroscience Letters 469(1), 34–38 (2010)
Shyu, K., Lee, P., Liu, Y.: Dual-frequency steady-state visual evoked potential for brain computer interface. Neuroscience Letters 483(1), 28–31 (2010)
Lopez-Gordo, M.A., Prieto, A., Pelayo, F., Morillas, C.: Use of Phase in Brain–Computer Interfaces based on Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials. Neural Processing Letters 32(1), 1–9 (2010)
Wang, Y., Gao, X., Hong, B., Jia, C., Gao, S.: Brain-Computer Interfaces Based on Visual Evoked Potentials. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine 27(5), 64–71 (2008)
Ikegami, S., Takano, K., Saeki, N., Kansaku, K.: Operation of a P300-based brain-computer interface by individuals with cervical spinal cord injury. Clinical Neurophysiology (2010)
Kleih, S., Nijboer, F., Halder, S., Kübler, A.: Motivation modulates the P300 amplitude during brain–computer interface use. Clinical Neurophysiology 121(7), 1023–1031 (2010)
Klobassa, D., et al.: Toward a high-throughput auditory P300-based brain–computer interface. Clinical Neurophysiology 120(7), 1252–1261 (2009)
Halder, S., et al.: An auditory oddball brain–computer interface for binary choices. Clinical Neurophysiology 121(4), 516–523 (2010)
Kansaku, K., Hata, N., Takano, K.: My thoughts through a robot’s eyes: An augmented reality-brain–machine interface. Neuroscience Research 66(2), 219–222 (2010)
Ron-Angeviny, R., Diaz-Estrella, A.: Brain–computer interface: Changes in performance using virtual reality techniques. Neuroscience Letters (2008)
Brunner, P., Joshi, S., Briskin, S., Wolpaw, J.R., Bischof, H., Schalk, G.: Does the ‘P300’ speller depend on eye gaze? Journal of Neural Engineering 7(5), 056013 (2010)
Lopez-Gordo, M.A., Pelayo, F., Prieto, A.: A high performance SSVEP-BCI without gazing. In: The 2010 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), pp. 1–5 (2010)
Allison, B.Z., McFarland, D.J., Schalk, G., Zheng, S.D., Jackson, M.M., Wolpaw, J.R.: Towards an independent brain–computer interface using steady state visual evoked potentials. Clinical Neurophysiology 119(2), 399–408 (2008)
Gao, X., Xu, D., Cheng, M., Gao, S.: A BCI-Based Environmental Controller for the Motion-Disabled. IEEE Transactions On Neural Systems And Rehabilitation Engineering 11, 137–140 (2003)
Nijboer, F.: An auditory brain–computer interface (BCI). Journal of Neuroscience Methods 167(1), 43–50 (2008)
Furdea, A., et al.: An auditory oddball (P300) spelling system for brain-computer interfaces. Psychophysiology 46(3), 617–625 (2009)
Lopez-Gordo, M.A., Fernandez, E., Romero, S., Pelayo, F.: A Brain-computer interface Based on Natural Speech. under revision
Meyer, J.E., Robert, R.J., Bayles, J.D., Volkert, K., Evitts, P.E.: Dichotic listening: expanded norms and clinical application. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 17, 79–90 (2002)
Cabrera, A.F., Dremstrup, K.: Auditory and spatial navigation imagery in Brain–Computer Interface using optimized wavelets. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 174(1), 135–146 (2008)
Murguialday, A.R., et al.: Transition from the locked in to the completely locked-in state: A physiological analysis. Clinical Neurophysiology (2010)
Owen, A.M., Schiff, N.D., Laureys, S.: A new era of coma and consciousness science. Progress in Brain Research 177, 399–411 (2009)
Coleman, M.R., et al.: Do vegetative patients retain aspects of language comprehension? Evidence from fMRI. Brain 130(10), 2494–2507 (2007)
Laureys, S., Perrin, F., Bredart, S.: Self-consciousness in non-communicative patients. Consciousness and Cognition 16(3), 722–741 (2007)
Boly, M., et al.: When thoughts become action: An fMRI paradigm to study volitional brain activity in non-communicative brain injured patients. NeuroImage 36(3), 979–992 (2007)
Owen, A.M.: Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State. Science 313(5792), 1402–1402 (2006)
Owen, A.M., Coleman, M.R.: Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1129(1), 130–138 (2008)
Kübler, A.: Brain–Computer Interfaces for Communication in Paralysed Patients and Implications for Disorders of Consciousness. In: Laureys, S., Tononi, G. (eds.) The Neurology of Consciousness, p. 440. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lopez-Gordo, M.A., Ron-Angevin, R., Pelayo Valle, F. (2011). Auditory Brain-Computer Interfaces for Complete Locked-In Patients. In: Cabestany, J., Rojas, I., Joya, G. (eds) Advances in Computational Intelligence. IWANN 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6691. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21501-8_47
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21501-8_47
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21500-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21501-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)