Abstract
Reaching the milestone figure of 500 million members in July 2010, the growth of the social networking site Facebook has rapidly accelerated. Currently, its membership figures would make it the third largest country in the world, suggesting that participation in online social networks has become more than a cursory phenomenon. Members of Facebook are required to create an individualized online profile that provides information about themselves, their physical appearance, individual tastes, and preferences (see Liu 2007; Liu et al. 2006), and that highlights certain aspects of their own personality. By means of these features, users inevitably construct and manage impressions of their self. Research has already shown that such a personal webpage even allows a more detailed self-presentation than a casual face-to-face interaction and that people indeed make use of it in order to emphasize certain aspects of their “true” self (Bargh et al. 2002; Haferkamp and Krämer 2010). Additionally, empirical findings indicate that social networking sites (SNSs) are not only a potential means for self-presentation but that people are indeed highly motivated to use this new arena for presenting themselves (Haferkamp and Krämer 2010). In doing this, they even adopt profile elements that have originally been provided for other purposes (e.g., people become a member of a group in order to display their attitudes and interests instead of in order to communicate with others, Haferkamp and Krämer 2009). This tendency might be due to the fundamental motive of every human being to present him/herself in a positive way and, in doing so, gain positive reactions from those forming an impression (Leary 1995; Leary and Kowalski 1990).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Archer JL (1980) Self-disclosure. In: Wegner D, Vallacher R (eds) The self in social psychology. Oxford University, London, pp 183–204
Bargh JA, McKenna KYA, Fitzsimons GM (2002) Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the “true self” on the internet. J Soc Issues 58(1):33–48
Barnes SB (2006) A privacy paradox: social networking in the United States. First Monday 11. www.firstmonday.org/issues/-issue11_9/barnes/index.html. Accessed 8 Aug 2008
Baumeister RF, Jones EE (1978) When self-presentation is constrained by the target’s prior knowledge: consistency and compensation. J Personal Soc Psychol 36:608–618
boyd dm, Ellison NB (2007) Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. J Comput Mediat Commun 13(1):210–230
Burgoon JK (1982) Privacy and communication. In: Burgoon M (ed) Communication yearbook 6. Sage, Beverly Hills, pp 206–249
Ellison N, Heino R, Gibbs J (2006) Managing impressions online: self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. J Comput Mediat Commun 11(2):415–441
Goffman E (1959) The presentation of self in everyday life. Double Day, Garden City
Gollwitzer PM (1986) Striving for specific identities: the social reality of self-symbolizing. In: Baumeister R (ed) Public self and private self. Springer, New York, pp 143–159
Gosling SD, Gaddis S, Vazire S (2007) Personality impressions based on facebook profiles. Paper presented at the international conference on weblogs and social media 2007, Boulder. http://www.icwsm.-org/papers/3-Gosling-Gaddis-Vazire.pdf. Accessed 2 Mar 2008
Haferkamp N, Krämer NC (2009) When I was your age, Pluto was a planet”: Impression Management and Need to belong as motives for joining groups on social networking sites. Paper presented at the annual meeting of ICA 2009 (International Communication Association), Chicago
Haferkamp N, Krämer NC (2010) Creating a digital self: impression management and impression formation on social networking sites. In: Drotner K, Schrøder KC (eds) Digital content creation: creativity, competence, critique. Peter Lang, New York, pp 129–149
Joinson AN (2001) Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: the role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. Eur J Soc Psychol 31:177–192
Jones EE (1964) Ingratiation. Appleton, New York
Jones EE, Pittman TS (1982) Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. In: Suls J (ed) Psychological perspectives on the self. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 231–262
Leary MR (1995) Self presentation: impression management and interpersonal behavior. Brown & Benchmark, Madison
Leary MR, Kowalski RM (1990) Impression management: a literature review and two-component model. Psychol Bull 107:34–47
Lenhart A, Madden M (2007) Teens, privacy & online social networks. Pew internet & American life project 2007. www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Teens_Privacy_SNS_Report_Final.pdf. Accessed 8 Aug 2008
Lewis K, Kaufman J, Christakis N (2008) The taste for privacy: an analysis of college student privacy settings in an online social network. J Comput Mediat Commun 14:79–100
Liu H (2007) Social network profiles as taste performances. J Comput-Mediat Commun 13(1). http://jcmc.indi-ana.edu/vol13/issue1/liu.html. Accessed 10 May 2007
Liu H, Maes PM, Davenport G (2006) Unraveling the taste fabric of social networks. Int J Semantic Web Inf Syst 2(1):42–71
Livingstone S (2008) Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media Soc 10:339–411
Markus H, Nurius P (1986) Possible selves. Am Psychol 41:954–969
Mehdizadeh S (2010) Self-presentation 2.0: narcissism and self-esteem on Facebook. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 13(4):357–364
Reinecke L, Trepte S (2008) Privatsphäre 2.0: Konzepte von Privatheit, Intimsphäre und Werten im Umgang mit “user-generated-content” (Concepts of privacy, intimacy, and values with regard to “user-generated-content”). In: Zerfaß A, Welker M, Schmidt J (eds) Kommunikation, Partizipation und Wirkungen im Social Web. (Communication, participation, and effects in the social web) Band 1: Grundlagen und Methoden: Von der Gesellschaft zum Individuum. Halem Verlag, Köln, pp 205–228
Reingold H (1993) The virtual community. Addison-Wesley, New York
Schlenker BR (1980) Impression management: the self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Brooks/Cole, Monterey
Schneider DJ (1981) Tactical self-presentations: toward a broader conception. In: Tedeschi JT (ed) Impression management theory and social psychological research. Academic, New York, pp 23–40
Tidwell LS, Walther JB (2002) Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations. Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Hum Commun Res 28(3):317–348
Toma CL, Hancock J (2009) Self-presentation in online dating profiles: the role of physical attractiveness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the international communication association, Chicago
Utz S, Krämer NC (2009) The privacy paradox on social network sites revisited: the role of individual characteristics and group norms. J Psychosoc Res Cyberspace. http://www.cyberpsychology.eu/view-.php?cisloclanku=2009111001. Accessed 3 Mar 2010
Walther JB (1996) Computer-mediated communication: impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Commun Res 23:3–43
Walther JB, Van der Heide B, Kim SY, Westerman D, Tong ST (2008) The role of friends’ appearance and behavior and evaluations of individuals on Facebook: are we known by the company we keep? Hum Commun Res 34:28–49
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Krämer, N.C., Haferkamp, N. (2011). Online Self-Presentation: Balancing Privacy Concerns and Impression Construction on Social Networking Sites. In: Trepte, S., Reinecke, L. (eds) Privacy Online. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21521-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21521-6_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21520-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21521-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)