Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Comparison of Two Tree Representations for Data-Driven Volumetric Image Filtering

  • Conference paper
Mathematical Morphology and Its Applications to Image and Signal Processing (ISMM 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 6671))

Abstract

We compare two tree-based, hierarchical representations of volumetric gray-scale images for data-driven image filtering. One representation is the max-tree, in which tree nodes represent connected components of all level sets of a data set. The other representation is the watershed tree, consisting of nodes representing nested, homogeneous image regions. Region attribute-based filtering is achieved by pruning the trees. Visualization is used to compare both the filtered images and trees. In our comparison, we also consider flexibility, intuitiveness, and extendability of both tree representations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armstrong, C.J., Price, B.L., Barrett, W.A.: Interactive segmentation of image volumes with Live Surface. Computers and Graphics 31(2), 212–229 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Battista, G.D., Eades, P., Tamassia, R., Tollis, I.G.: Graph Drawing: Algorithms for the Visualization of Graphs. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Berger, C., Géraud, T., Levillain, R., Widynski, N.: Effective component tree computation with application to pattern recognition in astronomical imaging. In: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Image Processing 2007, San Antonio, Texas, USA, September 16-19, pp. IV–41–IV–44 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beucher, S., Meyer, F.: The morphological approach to segmentation: the watershed transformation. In: Proc. ISMM 1993, pp. 433–481 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Breen, E., Jones, R.: Attribute openings, thinnings and granulometries. Comp. Vision and Image Und. 64(3), 377–389 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cabral, B., Cam, N., Foran, J.: Accelerated volume rendering and tomographic reconstruction using texture mapping hardware. In: Workshop on Volume Visualization, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 91–98 (October 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Levoy, M.: Display of surfaces from volume data. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 8(3), 29–37 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Marcotegui, B., Beucher, S.: Fast implementation of waterfall based on graphs. In: Proc. ISMM 2005, pp. 177–186. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Marcotegui, B., Zanoguera, F.: Image editing tools based on multi-scale segmentation. In: Proc. ISMM 2002, pp. 127–135. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Meyer, F.: Morphological multiscale and interactive segmentation. In: EURASIP Workshop on Nonlinear Signal and Image Processing, pp. 369–377 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Meyer, F., Maragos, P.: Multiscale morphological segmentations based on watershed, flooding, and eikonal PDE. In: Nielsen, M., Johansen, P., Fogh Olsen, O., Weickert, J. (eds.) Scale-Space 1999. LNCS, vol. 1682, pp. 351–362. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Monasse, P., Guichard, F.: Fast computation of a contrast invariant image representation. IEEE Trans. Image Processing 9(5), 860–872 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Naegel, B., Passat, N.: Component-trees and multi-value images: a comparative study. In: Wilkinson, M.H.F., Roerdink, J.B.T.M. (eds.) ISMM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5720, pp. 261–271. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Najman, L., Couprie, M.: Building the component tree in quasi-linear time. IEEE Trans. Image Processing 15(11), 3531–3539 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Passat, N., Naegel, B.: An extension of component-trees to partial orders. In: Proc. 16th Int. Conf. Image Processing (ICIP 2009), November 7-10, pp. 3981–3984. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Roerdink, J.B.T.M., Meijster, A.: The watershed transform: definitions, algorithms, and parallelization strategies. Fundamenta Informaticae 41, 187–228 (2000)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Salembier, P., Garrido, L.: Binary Partition Tree. as an efficient representation for image processing, segmentation, and information retrieval. IEEE Trans. Image Processing 9(4), 561–576 (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Salembier, P., Oliveras, A., Garrido, L.: Anti-extensive connected operators for image and sequence processing. IEEE Trans. Image Processing 7(4), 555–570 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Salembier, P., Wilkinson, M.: Connected operators: A review of region-based morphological image processing techniques. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 26(6), 136–157 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Urbach, E.R., Roerdink, J.B.T.M., Wilkinson, M.H.F.: Connected shape-size pattern spectra for rotation and scale-invariant classification of gray-scale images. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 29(2), 272–285 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Westenberg, M.A., Roerdink, J.B.T.M., Wilkinson, M.H.F.: Volumetric attribute filtering and interactive visualization using the Max-tree representation. IEEE Trans. Image Processing 16(12), 2943–2952 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Wilkinson, M.H.F., Westenberg, M.A.: Shape preserving filament enhancement filtering. In: Niessen, W.J., Viergever, M.A. (eds.) MICCAI 2001. LNCS, vol. 2208, pp. 770–777. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, Den Dolech 2, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

    Andrei C. Jalba & Michel A. Westenberg

Authors
  1. Andrei C. Jalba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michel A. Westenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, via Enrico Fermi, 2749, 21027, Ispra (VA), Italy

    Pierre Soille , Martino Pesaresi  & Georgios K. Ouzounis ,  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jalba, A.C., Westenberg, M.A. (2011). A Comparison of Two Tree Representations for Data-Driven Volumetric Image Filtering. In: Soille, P., Pesaresi, M., Ouzounis, G.K. (eds) Mathematical Morphology and Its Applications to Image and Signal Processing. ISMM 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6671. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21569-8_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21569-8_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21568-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21569-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation