Abstract
The Use Case Map (UCM) notation is a scenario modelling language part of ITU-T’s User Requirements Notation and intended for the elicitation, analysis, specification, and validation of requirements. Like many visual modelling languages, the concrete graphical syntax of the UCM notation has not been designed taking cognitive effectiveness formally into consideration. This paper conducts a systematic analysis of the UCM notation through an evaluation against a set of evidence-based principles for visual notation design. Several common weaknesses are identified and some improvements suggested. A broader goal of the paper is to raise the awareness of the modelling, language design, and standardization communities about the need for such evaluations and the maturity of the techniques to perform them.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bertin, J.: Sémiologie Graphique: Les Diagrammes - Les Réseaux - Les Cartes. Gauthier-VillarsMouton & Cie (1973)
Biederman, I.: Recognition-by-Components: A Theory of Human Image Understanding. Psychological Review 94(2), 115–147 (1987)
Britton, C., Jones, S.: The Untrained Eye: How Languages for Software Specification Support Understanding by Untrained Users. Human Computer Interaction 14, 191–244 (1999)
Buhr, R.J., Casselman, R.S.: Use Case Maps for Object-Oriented Systems. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1996)
Citrin, W.: Strategic Directions in Visual Languages Research. ACM Computing Surveys 24(4) (1996)
Genon, N., Amyot, D., Heymans, P., Moody, D.L.: Applying the “Physics” of Notations to (URN) Use Case Maps. Tech. Rep., PReCISE - University of Namur (2010), http://www.info.fundp.ac.be/~nge/AnalysingUCMagainstPoN.pdf
Genon, N., Heymans, P., Amyot, D.: Analysing the Cognitive Effectiveness of the BPMN 2.0 Visual Notation. In: Malloy, B., Staab, S., van den Brand, M. (eds.) SLE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6563, pp. 377–396. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Lohse, G.L.: The Role of Working Memory in Graphical Information Processing. Behaviour & Information Technology, 297–308 (1997)
Goodman, N.: Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols. Bobbs-Merrill Co., Indianapolis (1968)
Green, T., Blandford, A., Church, L., Roast, C., Clarke, S.: Cognitive Dimensions: Achievements, New Directions, and Open Questions. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 17, 328–365 (2006)
ITU-T: Recommendation Z.601 Data Architecture of One Software System. International Telecommunication Union (February 2007)
ITU-T: Recommendation Z.111 Notations to Define ITU-T Languages. International Telecommunication Union (November 2008)
ITU-T: Recommendation Z.151 User Requirements Notation (URN) Language Definition. International Telecommunication Union (November 2008)
Kim, J., Hahn, J., Hahn, H.: How Do We Understand a Systeme with (So) Many Diagrams? Cognitive Integration Processes in Diagrammatic Reasoning. Information Systems Research 11(3), 284–303 (2000)
Krogstie, J., Sindre, G., Jorgensen, H.: Process Models Representing Knowledge for Action: a Revised Quality Framework. European Journal of Information Systems 15, 91–102 (2006)
Krogstie, J., Solvberg, A.: Information Systems Engineering - Conceptual Modeling in a Quality Perspective, Kompendiumforlaget. Kompendiumforlaget, Trondheim, Norway (2003)
Lamping, J., Rao, R.: The Hyperbolic Browser: a Focus + Context Technique for Visualizing Large Hierarchies. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 7, 33–55 (1999)
Larkin, J., Simon, H.: Why a Diagram Is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words. Cognitive Science 11, 65–99 (1987)
Lohse, G.: A Cognitive Model for Understanding Graphical Perception. Human Computer Interaction 8(4), 353–388 (1993)
Lynch, K.: The Image of the City. MIT Press, Cambridge (1960)
Masri, K., Parker, D., Gemino, A.: Using Iconic Graphics in Entity Relationship Diagrams: The Impact on Understanding. Journal of Database Management 19(3), 22–41 (2008)
Mayer, R.E., Moreno, R.: Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychologist 38(1), 43–52 (2003)
Mendling, J., Reijers, H., van der Aalst, W.: Seven Process Modelling Guidelines (7PMG). Information and Software Technology 52(2), 127–136 (2010)
Miller, G.A.: The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information. Psycological Review, 81–97 (1956)
Moody, D.L.: The “Physics” of Notations: Towards a Scientific Basis for Constructing Visual Notations in Software Engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 35, 756–779 (2009)
Moody, D.L.: Theory Development in Visual Language Research: Beyond the Cognitive Dimensions of Notations. In: Proc. of the IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VLHCC 2009), pp. 151–154 (2009)
Moody, D.L., Heymans, P., Matulevičius, R.: Visual Syntax Does Matter: Improving the Cognitive Effectiveness of the i* Visual Notation. Requirements Engineering 15(2), 141–175 (2010)
Moody, D.L., van Hillegersberg, J.: Evaluating the Visual Syntax of UML: An analysis of the Cognitive Effectiveness of the UML Family Of Diagrams. In: Proc. of the 1st International Conference on Software Language Engineering (2008)
Paivio, A.: Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1986)
Petre, M.: Why Looking Isn’t Always Seeing: Readership Skills and Graphical Programming. Communications of ACM 38(6), 33–44 (1995)
Popper, K.R.: Science as Falsification. In: Routledge, Keagan, P. (eds.) Conjectures and Refutations, London, pp. 30–39 (1963)
Schuette, R., Rotthowe, T.: The Guidelines of Modeling - An Approach to Enhance the Quality in Information Models. In: Ling, T.-W., Ram, S., Li Lee, M. (eds.) ER 1998. LNCS, vol. 1507, pp. 240–254. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
Shaft, T., Vessey, I.: The Role of Cognitive Fit in the Relationship between Software Comprehension and Modification. MIS Quarterly 30(1), 29–55 (2006)
Siau, K.: Informational and Computational Equivalence in Comparing Information Modelling Methods. Journal of Database Management 15(1), 73–86 (2004)
Turetken, O., Schuff, D., Sharda, R., Ow, T.: Supporting Systems Analysis and Design Through Fisheye Views. Communications of ACM 47(9), 72–77 (2004)
Weber, R.: Ontological Foundations Of Information Systems (Coopers And Lybrand Accounting Research Methodology Monograph No. 4). Coopers And Lybrand (1997)
White, A.W.: The Elements of Graphic Design: Space, Unity (2002)
Winn, W.: An Account of How Readers Search for Information in Diagrams. Contemporary Educational Psychology 18, 162–185 (1993)
Yu, E.: Towards Modeling and Reasoning Support for Early-Phase Requirements Engineering. In: Proc. of the 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE 1997), pp. 226–235. IEEE Computer Society, USA (1997)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Genon, N., Amyot, D., Heymans, P. (2011). Analysing the Cognitive Effectiveness of the UCM Visual Notation. In: Kraemer, F.A., Herrmann, P. (eds) System Analysis and Modeling: About Models. SAM 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6598. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21652-7_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21652-7_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21651-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21652-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)