Skip to main content

Experience Driven Process Improvement

  • Conference paper
Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling (BPMDS 2011, EMMSAD 2011)

Abstract

The importance of process improvement and the role that best practice reference models play in the achievement of process improvement are both well recognized. Best practice reference models are generally created by experts in the domain who are external to the organization. However, best practice can also be implicitly derived from the work practices of actual workers within the organisation, especially when there is opportunity for variance within the work, i.e. there may be different approaches to achieve the same process goal. In this paper, we propose to support process improvement intrinsically by utilizing the experiences and knowledge of business process users to inform and improve the current practices. The main challenge in this regard is identifying the “best” previous practices, which are often based on multiple criteria. To this end, we propose a method based on the skyline operator, which is applied on criteria relevant data derived from business process execution logs. We will demonstrate that the proposed method is capable to generate meaningful recommendations from large data sets in an efficient way, thereby effectively facilitating organizational learning and inherent process improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gartner: Meeting the Challenge: The 2009 CIO Agenda. Egham, UK (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lu, R., Sadiq, S.K.: Managing process variants as an information resource. In: Dustdar, S., Fiadeiro, J.L., Sheth, A.P. (eds.) BPM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4102, pp. 426–431. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Reichert, M., Rinderle, S., Dadam, P.: ADEPT workflow management system: In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Weske, M. (eds.) BPM 2003. LNCS, vol. 2678, pp. 370–379. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Aalst, W.M.P.v.d.: Flexible Workflow Management Systems: An Approach Based on Generic Process Models. In: Database and Expert Systems Applications, 818–818 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sadiq, S., Sadiq, W., Orlowska, M.: A Framework for Constraint Specification and Validation in Flexible Workflows. Information Systems 30 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schonenberg, H., Weber, B., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Supporting flexible processes through recommendations based on history. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 51–66. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Aalst, W.M.P.v.d., Dongen, B.F.v., Herbst, J., Maruster, L., Schimm, G., Weijters, A.J.M.M.: Workflow mining: a survey of issues and approaches. Data Knowl. Eng. 47, 237–267 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. van der Aalst, W.M.P., de Medeiros, A.K.A., Weijters, A.J.M.M.T.: Process equivalence: Comparing two process models based on observed behavior. In: Dustdar, S., Fiadeiro, J.L., Sheth, A.P. (eds.) BPM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4102, pp. 129–144. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Lu, R., Sadiq, S.K.: On the discovery of preferred work practice through business process variants. In: Parent, C., Schewe, K.-D., Storey, V.C., Thalheim, B. (eds.) ER 2007. LNCS, vol. 4801, pp. 165–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. van Dongen, B., Dijkman, R., Mendling, J.: Measuring Similarity between Business Process Models. In: Advanced Information Systems Engineering, pp. 450–464 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hwang, C., Yoon, K.: Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications: a state-of-the-art survey. Springer, Heidelberg (1981)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Börzsönyi, S., Kossmann, D., Stocker, K.: The skyline operator. In: ICDE (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Leymann, F., Altenhuber, W.: Managing business processes as an information resource. IBM Syst. J. 33, 326–348 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Biazzo, S.: Approaches to business process analysis: a review. Business Process Management Journal 6, 99–112 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Thom, L., Reichert, M., Chiao, C., Iochpe, C., Hess, G.: Inventing Less, Reusing More, and Adding Intelligence to Business Process Modeling. In: Database and Expert Systems Applications, pp. 837–850 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lin, X., Yuan, Y., Zhang, Q., Zhang, Y.: Selecting stars: The k most representative skyline operator. In: ICDE, pp. 86–95. Citeseer (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wong, R.C.-W., Pei, J., Fu, A.W.-C., Wang, K.: Online skyline analysis with dynamic preferences on nominal attributes. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 21, 35 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hsin-Hsien, L., Wei-Guang, T.: Incorporating Multi-Criteria Ratings in Recommendation Systems. In: IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration, IRI 2007, pp. 273–278 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mansar, S., Reijers, H., Ounnar, F.: Development of a decision-making strategy to improve the efficiency of BPR. Expert Systems with Applications 36, 3248–3262 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kossmann, D., Ramsak, F., Rost, S.: Shooting stars in the sky: an online algorithm for skyline queries. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, VLDB Endowment, Hong Kong, China (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wong, R.C.-W., Fu, A.W.-C., Pei, J., Ho, Y.S., Wong, T., Liu, Y.: Efficient skyline querying with variable user preferences on nominal attributes. In: Proc. VLDB Endow., vol. 1, pp. 1032–1043 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chomicki, J., Godfrey, P., Gryz, J., Liang, D.: Skyline with Presorting. In: International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), pp. 717–717 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yeh, C.H.: A Problem-based Selection of Multi-attribute Decision-making Methods. International Transactions in Operational Research 9, 169–181 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zimmermann, H.J.: Fuzzy set theory–and its applications. Kluwer Academic Pub., Dordrecht (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Fishburn, P.C.: Additive utilities with incomplete product sets: application to priorities and assignments. Operations Research 15, 537–542 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Eder, H., Wei, F.: Evaluation of skyline algorithms in PostgreSQL. In: Proceedings of the 2009 International Database Engineering & Applications Symposium. ACM, Cetraro-Calabria (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rozinat, A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Decision mining in proM. In: Dustdar, S., Fiadeiro, J.L., Sheth, A.P. (eds.) BPM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4102, pp. 420–425. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Setiawan, M.A., Sadiq, S. (2011). Experience Driven Process Improvement. In: Halpin, T., et al. Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling. BPMDS EMMSAD 2011 2011. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 81. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21759-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21759-3_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21758-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21759-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics