Skip to main content

Abstract

Trust management systems has been proposed to address joyless security in open and distributed environments (Web, Semantic Web, Peer-to-peer networks, etc.).

A user usually spent a lot of time by building her reputation and by creating a network of trusted/distrusted users. Without possibility of seamless transfer from one trust management system to another, a user is forced to build a new reputation/network of trusted users again. This problem will become even more severe, as many current systems using trust as a key factor influencing ability to communicate within a group of users will be outdated and some of them even down.

The paper presents a specification of the seamless transfer problem and it also introduces a solution – the Heritage Trust Model based on dynamic graphs and ontologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aringhieri, R., Damiani, E., Sabine, Paraboschi, S., Samarati, P.: Fuzzy techniques for trust and reputation management in anonymous peer-to-peer systems. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57(4), 462–478 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bharadwaj, K., Mohammad a. h. y. a. Al-Shamri.: Fuzzy computational models for trust and reputation systems. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 8(1), 37–47 (2009), doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2008.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Emekci, F., Sahin, O.D., Agrawal, D., Abbadi, A.E.: A Peer-to-Peer Framework for Web Service Discovery with Ranking. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services, June 06–09, p. 192 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology Matching. Springer, Heidelberg (2007); ISBN: 3-540-49611-4. ISBN13: 978-3-540-49611-3. LoC#: 2007926257

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Masolo, C., Oltramari, A., Schneider, L.: Sweetening Ontologies with DOLCE. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. Ontologies and the Semantic Web (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gerard, J., Cai, H., Wang, J.: Alliatrust: A trustable reputation management scheme for unstructured P2P systems. In: Chung, Y.-C., Moreira, J.E. (eds.) GPC 2006. LNCS, vol. 3947, pp. 115–125. Springer, Heidelberg (2006), doi:10.1007/11745693_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Graves, M., Constabaris, A., Brickley, D.: FOAF: Connecting People on the Semantic Web. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 43(3), 191–202 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gupta, M., Judge, P., Ammar, M.: A reputation system for peer-to-peer networks. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Network and Operating Systems Support for Digital Audio and Video, ACM, New York (2003), doi:10.1145/776322.776346 ISBN: 1-58113-694-3

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hoffman, K., Zage, D., Rotaru, C.N.: A survey of attack and defense techniques for reputation systems. ACM Computing Surveys 42(1), 1–31 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kamvar, S.D., Schlosser, M.T., Molina, H.G.: The Eigentrust algorithm for reputation management in P2P networks. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 640–651 (2003), doi:10.1145/775152.775242

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, F., Ding, Y.: Ecological Network-Inspired Trust Management Model of P2P Networks. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Digital Media and its Application in Museum & Heritages, pp. 297–302 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, X., Xiao, L.: hiREP: Hierarchical Reputation Management for Peer-to-Peer Systems. In: International Conference on Parallel Processing, ICPP 2006, pp. 289–296 (August 2006), doi:10.1109/ICPP.2006.48

    Google Scholar 

  13. Majithia, S., Ali, A.S., Rana, O.F., Walker, D.W.: Reputation-Based Semantic Service Discovery. In: Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, June 14–16, pp. 297–302 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Malik, Z., Bouguettaya, A.: RATEWeb: Reputation Assessment for Trust Establishment among Web services. The VLDB Journal 18(4), 885–911 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Matsuo, Y., Hamasaki, M., Mori, J., Takeda, H., Hasida, K.: Ontological Consideration on Human Relationship Vocabulary for FOAF. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Friend of a Friend, Social Networking and Semantic Web (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mekouar, L., Iraqi, Y., Boutaba, R.: Reputation-Based Trust Management in Peer-to-Peer Systems: Taxonomy and Anatomy. In: Handbook of Peer-to-Peer Networking: Part 6, pp. 689–732. Springer Science + Business Media, LLC (2010); ISBN: 978-0-387-09750-3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Michael Maximilien, E., Singh, M.P.: A Framework and Ontology for Dynamic Web Services Selection. IEEE Internet Computing 8(5), 84–93 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Michael Maximilien, E., Singh, M.P.: Toward autonomic web services trust and selection. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Service Oriented Computing, New York, USA, November 15–19 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Michael Maximilien, E., Singh, M.P.: Agent-based trust model involving multiple qualities. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, The Netherlands, July 25–29 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mármol, F.G., Pérez, G.M.: Towards pre-standardization of trust and reputation models for distributed and heterogeneous systems. Computer Standards & Interfaces 32(4), 185–196 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Morselli, R., Katz, J., Bhattacharjee, B.: A Game-Theoretic Framework for Analyzing Trust-Inference Protocols. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on the Economics of Peer-to-peer Systems (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sabater, J., Sierra, C.: Reputation and social network analysis in multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: Part 1, Bologna, Italy, July 15–19 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Singh, A., Liu, L.: TrustMe: Anonymous management of trust relationships in decentralized P2P systems. In: IEEE International Conference on Peer-to-peer Computing, pp. 142–149 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Skopik, F., Schall, D., Dustdar, S.: Modeling and mining of dynamic trust in complex service-oriented systems. Distributed Systems Group, Vienna University of Technology, Austria (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Song, S., Hwang, K., Zhou, R., Kwok, Y.K.: Trusted P2P Transactions with Fuzzy Reputation Aggregation. IEEE Internet Computing 9(6), 24–34 (2005), doi:10.1109/MIC.2005.136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Šiljak, D.D.: Dynamic graphs. Nonlinear Analysis: Hybrid Systems 2, 544–567 (2008)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Xiong, L., Liu, L.: PeerTrust: supporting reputation-based trust for peer-to-peer electronic communities. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 16(7), 843–857 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. De Gan, J.: MeNowDocument: A FOAF extension for defining often changing variables in FOAF, http://schema.peoplesdns.com/menow

  29. Kostakos, V.: Temporal graphs. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 388 (2009), http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6TVG-4V1KMP2-1/2/4f88a3c422746c23b74ced3f48b4af40 ISSN 0378-4371

  30. FOAF – Friend of a Friend Vocabulary and Ontology, http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/index.rdf

  31. OWL – Web Ontology Language, http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features

  32. RDF – Resource Description Framework, W3C Semantic Web Activity, http://www.w3.org/RDF

  33. RDFS – RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema, http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema

  34. SUMO: The Suggested Upper Merged Ontology, http://www.ontologyportal.org

  35. SWEET Ontologies: Semantic Web for Earth and Environmental Terminology (SWEET), http://sweet.jpl.nasa.gov/ontology

  36. W3C – World Wide Web konsorcium, http://www.w3.org

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Špánek, R., Tyl, P. (2011). The Heritage Trust Model. In: Cherifi, H., Zain, J.M., El-Qawasmeh, E. (eds) Digital Information and Communication Technology and Its Applications. DICTAP 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 167. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22027-2_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22027-2_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22026-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22027-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics