Abstract
A non-clausal connection calculus for classical first-order logic is presented that does not require the translation of input formulae into any clausal form. The definition of clauses is generalized, which may now also contain (sub-)matrices. Copying of appropriate (sub-)clauses in a dynamic way, i.e. during the actual proof search, is realized by a generalized extension rule. Thus, the calculus combines the advantage of a non-clausal proof search in tableau calculi with the more efficient goal-oriented proof search of clausal connection calculi. Soundness, completeness, and (relative) complexity results are presented as well as some optimization techniques.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Andrews, P.B.: Theorem Proving via General Matings. Journal of the ACM 28, 193–214 (1981)
Antonsen, R., Waaler, A.: Liberalized Variable Splitting. Journal of Automated Reasoning 38, 3–30 (2007)
Bibel, W.: Matings in Matrices. Communications of the ACM 26, 844–852 (1983)
Bibel, W.: Automated Theorem Proving. Vieweg, Wiesbaden (1987)
Gentzen, G.: Untersuchungen über das logische Schließen. Mathematische Zeitschrift 39, 176–210, 405–431 (1935)
Hähnle, R.: Tableaux and Related Methods. In: Robinson, A., Voronkov, A. (eds.) Handbook of Automated Reasoning, pp. 100–178. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2001)
Hähnle, R., Murray, N.V., Rosenthal, E.: Linearity and Regularity with Negation Normal Form. Theoretical Computer Science 328, 325–354 (2004)
Kreitz, C., Otten, J.: Connection-based Theorem Proving in Classical and Non-classical Logics. Journal of Universal Computer Science 5, 88–112 (1999)
Letz, R., Stenz, G.: Model Elimination and Connection Tableau Procedures. In: Robinson, A., Voronkov, A. (eds.) Handbook of Automated Reasoning, pp. 2015–2114. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2001)
Loveland, D.: Mechanical Theorem-Proving by Model Elimination. Journal of the ACM 15, 236–251 (1968)
Otten, J.: Clausal Connection-Based Theorem Proving in Intuitionistic First-Order Logic. In: Beckert, B. (ed.) TABLEAUX 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3702, pp. 245–261. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Otten, J.: Restricting Backtracking in Connection Calculi. AI Communications 23, 159–182 (2010)
Otten, J., Bibel, W.: leanCoP: Lean Connection-based Theorem Proving. Journal of Symbolic Computation 36, 139–161 (2003)
Plaisted, D., Greenbaum, S.: A Structure-preserving Clause Form Translation. Journal of Symbolic Computation 2, 293–304 (1986)
Robinson, A.: A Machine-oriented Logic Based on the Resolution Principle. Journal of the ACM 12, 23–41 (1965)
Schmitt, S., Lorigo, L., Kreitz, C., Nogin, A.: JProver: Integrating Connection-Based Theorem Proving into Interactive Proof Assistants. In: Goré, R., Leitsch, A., Nipkow, T. (eds.) IJCAR 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2083, pp. 421–426. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Waaler, A.: Connections in Nonclassical Logics. In: Robinson, A., Voronkov, A. (eds.) Handbook of Automated Reasoning, pp. 1487–1578. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2001)
Wallen, L.: Automated Deduction in Nonclassical Logics. MIT Press, Washington (1990)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Otten, J. (2011). A Non-clausal Connection Calculus. In: Brünnler, K., Metcalfe, G. (eds) Automated Reasoning with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods. TABLEAUX 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6793. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22119-4_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22119-4_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22118-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22119-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)