Skip to main content

Functional Analysis of Contrasting Conjunctions in Georgian

  • Conference paper
Logic, Language, and Computation (TbiLLC 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6618))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 632 Accesses

Abstract

There exist eight conjunctions in Georgian that are used to express semantic or pragmatic contrast. They can be presented as a hierarchy: aramed > oγond > tumca > magram > k’i//k’idev > xolo > tu > da. The hierarchy is organized in such a way that the ability of conjunctions to express contrasting conjoining decreases from the left to the right. On the basis of functional analysis of the conjunctions, we propose seven binary differential semantic/pragmatic features: +/–[Contrast], +/–[Opposition], +/–[Correction], +/–[Expectation], +/–[Wish], +/–[At least one], +/–[Strong underlining]. Certain combinations of the features express the main functions of the conjunctions which are relevant for formal representations of contrastive topics and/or focuses during the joining of some constituents or sentences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aronson, H.I.: Georgian: A Reading Grammar. Slavica, Chicago (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Asatiani, R.: The Main Devices of Foregrounding in the Information Structure of Georgian. In: 6th Internatioinal Symposium on LLC, Tbilisi 2005. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dzidziguri, S.: K’avširebi kartul enaši (Conjunction in the Georgian Language). TSU press, Tbilisi (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gamkrelidze, T., Kiknadze, Z., Shaduri, I., Shengelaia, N.: Teoriuli enatmecnierebis k’ursi (A Course in Theoretical Linguistics). TSU press, Tbilisi (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lang, E.: The Semantics of Coordination. Benjamins, New York (1984)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Shanidze, A.: Kartuli enis gramat’ik’is sapu3vlebi (Fundamentals of the Grammar of the Georgian Language). Mecniereba, Tbilisi (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shengelaia, N.: Arasruli sit’q’vebi da t’ekst’is semant’ik’uri mtlianoba (Minor Words and Semantic Completeness of a Text). Diogene, Tbilisi (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Asatiani, R. (2011). Functional Analysis of Contrasting Conjunctions in Georgian. In: Bezhanishvili, N., Löbner, S., Schwabe, K., Spada, L. (eds) Logic, Language, and Computation. TbiLLC 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6618. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22303-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22303-7_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22302-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22303-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics