Abstract
In this paper, we discuss dependencies between rhetorical discourse structure and relevance implicatures. We follow [3] and infer relevance implicatures from the assumption that an answer provides optimal information for solving an explicitly or implicitly given decision problem of the inquirer. Such a decision problem can be identified with a question raised in the conversation. Background questions not only depend on explicit questions under discussion but may also be raised by rhetorical relations such as Concession or Contrast. In this paper, we are especially concerned with implicatures of embedded questions. We show by some examples that determining the rhetorical relation that connects two text spans and setting up a pragmatic model that explains the implicatures of embedded sentences interact with each other.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Asher, N., Lascarides, A.: Logic of Conversation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)
Benz, A.: How to set up normal optimal answer models. In: Benz, A., Ebert, C., Jäger, G., Rooij, R.v. (eds.) Language, Games, and Evolution. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6207, pp. 14–39. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Benz, A., Rooij, R.v.: Optimal assertions and what they implicate: a uniform game theoretic approach. Topoi - an International Review of Philosophy 27(1), 63–78 (2007)
Büring, D.: On D-trees, beans and B–accents. Linguistics and Philosophy 20, 511–545 (2003)
Ginzburg, J.: Interrogatives: Questions, facts, and dialogue. In: Lappin, S. (ed.) Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. Blackwell, Oxford (1996)
Grice, H.P.: Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1989)
Jäger, G.: Game dynamics connects semantics and pragmatics. In: Pietarinen, A.-V. (ed.) Game Theory and Linguistic Meaning, pp. 89–102. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2007)
Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H.: Decisions with Multiple Objectives – Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993) (first published by John Wiley & Sons, 1976)
Lewis, D.: Convention. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1969)
Roberts, C.: Information Structure in Discourse: Towards an Integrated Formal Theory of Pragmatics. In: Yoon, J.H., Kathol, A. (eds.) Papers in Semantics. OSU Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 49, pp. 91–136 (1996)
Rooij, R.v.: Questioning to Resolve Decision Problems. Linguistics and Philosophy 26, 727–763 (2003)
Rooij, R.v.: Utility of Mention-Some Questions. Research on Language and Computation, 401–416 (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Benz, A., Salfner, F. (2011). Discourse Relations and Relevance Implicatures: A Case Study. In: Bezhanishvili, N., Löbner, S., Schwabe, K., Spada, L. (eds) Logic, Language, and Computation. TbiLLC 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6618. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22303-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22303-7_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22302-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22303-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)