Skip to main content

Ontology Extension and Population: An Approach for the Pharmacotherapeutic Domain

  • Conference paper
Natural Language Processing and Information Systems (NLDB 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6716))

  • 1811 Accesses

Abstract

For several years ontologies have been seen as a solution to share and reuse knowledge between humans and machines. An ontology is a knowledge photography at the moment of its creation. Nevertheless, in order to keep an ontology useful throughout time, it must be expanded and maintained regularly, mainly in the pharmacotherapeutic domain. Drug-therapy needs up-to-date and reliable information. Unfortunately, achieving a systematic ontology updating has is an arduous and a tedious task that becomes a bottleneck. To limit this obstacle we need methods that expedite the process of extension and population.This proposal aims the designing and validating method able to extract, from a corpus of summary of product characteristics and a pharmacotherapeutic ontology, the relevant knowledge to be added to the ontology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Slaughter, L., Soergel, D., Rindflesch, T.C.: Semantic representation of consumer questions and physician answers. International Journal of Medical Informatics 75, 513–529 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gonzalez-Gonzalez, A., Dawes, M., Sanchez-Mateos, J., Riesgo-Fuertes, R., Escortell-Mayor, E., Sanz-Cuesta, T., Hernandez-Fernandez, T.: Information needs and information-seeking behavior of primary care physicians. Annals of Family Medicine 5, 345 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gruber, T.: Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 43, 907–928 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Studer, R., Benjamins, V., Fensel, D.: Knowledge engineering: principles and methods. Data & Knowledge Engineering 25, 161–197 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Romá-Ferri, M., Cruanes, J., Palomar, M.: Quality Indicators of the OntoFIS Pharmacotherapeutics Ontology for Semantic Interoperability. In: Proceedings IADIS International Conference e-Health, pp. 107–114 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tanev, H., Magnini, B.: Weakly supervised approaches for ontology population. In: Proceeding of the 2008 Conference on Ontology Learning and Population: Bridging the Gap between Text and Knowledge, pp. 129–143. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Alfonseca, E., Manandhar, S.: An unsupervised method for general named entity recognition and automated concept discovery. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on General WordNet, pp. 1–9 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Avancini, H., Lavelli, A., Magnini, B., Sebastiani, F., Zanoli, R.: Expanding domain-specific lexicons by term categorization. In: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM symposium on Applied computing - SAC 2003, pp. 793–797. ACM Press, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cimiano, P., Pivk, A., Schmidt-Thieme, L., Staab, S.: Learning taxonomic relations from heterogeneous sources of evidence, pp. 59–73. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dean, M.: Semantic Web rules: Covering the use cases. In: Rules and Rule Markup Languages for the Semantic Web, pp. 1–5 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jung, J., Oh, K., Jo, G.: Extracting Relations towards Ontology Extension. In: Agent and Multi-Agent Systems: Technologies and Applications, pp. 242–251 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kietz, J., Maedche, A., Volz, R.: A method for semi-automatic ontology acquisition from a corporate intranet. In: Workshop Ontologies and text, Citeseer, pp. 2–6 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Maedche, A., Staab, S.: Ontology learning for the semantic web. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16, 72–79 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Valencia-Garcia, R.: Un entorno para la extracción incremental de conocimiento desde texto en lenguaje natural. PhD thesis, University of Murcia (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Valencia-García, R., Castellanos-Nieves, D., Fernández-Breis, J.T., Vivancos-Vicente, P.J.: A Methodology for Extracting Ontological Knowledge from Spanish Documents. In: Gelbukh, A. (ed.) CICLing 2006. LNCS, vol. 3878, pp. 71–80. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Valencia-Garcia, R., Ruiz-Sánchez, J.M., Vivancos-Vicente, P.J., Fernández-Breis, J.T., Martínez-Béjar, R.: An incremental approach for discovering medical knowledge from texts. Expert Systems with Applications 26, 291–299 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. D’Amato, C., Fanizzi, N.: Query answering and ontology population: An inductive approach. In: Proceedings of the 5th European, pp. 288–302 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. d’Amato, C., Fanizzi, N., Esposito, F.: Distance-based classification in OWL ontologies. In: Lovrek, I., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) KES 2008, Part II. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5178, pp. 656–661. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. D’Amato, C., Fanizzi, N., Esposito, F., Lukasiewicz, T.: Inductive Query Answering and Concept Retrieval Exploiting Local Models. In: 2009 Ninth International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, pp. 1209–1214 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Makki, J., Alquier, A., Prince, V.: An NLP-based ontology population for a risk management generic structure. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Soft Computing as Transdisciplinary Science and Technology, pp. 350–355. ACM, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Novalija, I., Mladenic, D.: Content and structure in the aspect of semi-automatic ontology extension. In: 2010 32nd International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces (ITI), pp. 115–120. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shi, L., Sun, J., Che, H.: Populating CRAB Ontology Using Context-Profile Based Approaches. Context, 210–220 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Valarakos, A., Paliouras, G., Karkaletsis, V., Vouros, G.: Enhancing ontological knowledge through ontology population and enrichment. In: Engineering Knowledge in the Age of the Semantic Web, pp. 144–156 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Volkova, S., Caragea, D., Hsu, W.H., Drouhard, J., Fowles, L.: Boosting Biomedical Entity Extraction by Using Syntactic Patterns for Semantic Relation Discovery. In: 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, pp. 272–278 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cruanes, J. (2011). Ontology Extension and Population: An Approach for the Pharmacotherapeutic Domain. In: Muñoz, R., Montoyo, A., Métais, E. (eds) Natural Language Processing and Information Systems. NLDB 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6716. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22327-3_51

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22327-3_51

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22326-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22327-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics