Skip to main content

Gender Differences and the Value of Choice in Intelligent Tutoring Systems

  • Conference paper
User Modeling, Adaption and Personalization (UMAP 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6787))

Abstract

Students interacted with an intelligent tutoring system to learn grammatical rules for an artificial language. Six tutoring policies were explored. One, based on a Dynamic Bayes’ Network model of skills, was learned from the performance of previous students. Overall, this policy and other intelligent policies outperformed random policies. Some policies allowed students to choose one of three problems to work on, while others presented a single problem at each iteration. The benefit of choice was not apparent in group statistics; however, there was a strong interaction with gender. Overall, women learned less than men, but they learned different amounts in the choice and no choice conditions, whereas men seemed unaffected by choice. We explore reasons for these interactions between gender, choice and learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Almond, R.G.: Cognitive modeling to represent growth (learning) using markov decision processes. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning 5, 313–324 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arroyo, I., Woolf, B., Beal, C.R.: Addressing Cognitive Differences and Gender During Problem Solving. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning 4, 31–63 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barnes, T., Stamper, J.: Toward automatic hint generation for logic proof tutoring using historical student data. In: Woolf, B.P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., Lajoie, S. (eds.) ITS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5091, pp. 373–382. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Beal, C.R., Arroyo, I., Cohen, P.R., Woolf, B.P.: Evaluation of AnimalWatch: An intelligent tutoring system for arithmetic and fractions. Journal of Interactive Online Learning 9, 65–77 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beal, C.R., Qu, L.: Relating machine estimates of students’ learning goals to learning outcomes: A DBN approach. In: AIED (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beck, J.E., Woolf, B.P., Beal, C.R.: Learning to teach: A machine learning architecture for intelligent tutor construction. In: AAAI (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dean, T., Kanazawa, K.: A model for reasoning about persistence and causation. Computational Intelligence 5, 142–150 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Green, D.T., Walsh, T.J., Cohen, P.R., Chang, Y.: Learning a Skill-Teaching Curriculum with Dynamic Bayes Nets. In: IAAI (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Woolf, B., Arroyo, I., Beal, C.R., Murray, T.: Gender and Cognitive Differences in Help Effectiveness During Problem Solving. In: Tech., Instr., Cog. and Learning (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Woolf, B.P.: Building intelligent interactive tutors. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Green, D.T., Walsh, T.J., Cohen, P.R., Beal, C.R., Chang, YH. (2011). Gender Differences and the Value of Choice in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In: Konstan, J.A., Conejo, R., Marzo, J.L., Oliver, N. (eds) User Modeling, Adaption and Personalization. UMAP 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6787. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22362-4_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22362-4_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22361-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22362-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics