Skip to main content

Transition Function Complexity of Finite Automata

  • Conference paper
Descriptional Complexity of Formal Systems (DCFS 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6808))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

State complexity of finite automata in some cases gives the same complexity value for automata which intuitively seem to have completely different complexities. In this paper we consider a new measure of descriptional complexity of finite automata — BC-complexity. Comparison of it with the state complexity is carried out here as well as some interesting minimization properties are discussed. It is shown that minimization of the number of states can lead to a superpolynomial increase of BC-complexity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Nigmatullin, R.: Complexity of Boolean Functions, Moscow (1986) (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barzdins, J., Trakhtenbrot, B.: Finite Automata. Behavior and Synthesis, Moscow (1970) (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boppana, R.B.: The complexity of Finite Functions, New York (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Straubing, H.: Automata, Formal Logic and Circuit Complexity. Birkhäuser, Basel (1994)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Savage, J.E.: Models of Computation: Exploring the Power of Computing. Addison Wesley, Reading (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Karp, R.M., Lipton, R.J.: Some connections between nonuniform and uniform complexity classes. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 1980 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mealy, G.H.: A Method to Synthesizing Sequential Circuits. Bell Systems Technical Journal, 1045–1079 (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hopcroft, J.E.: An n log n algorithm for minimizing states in finite automata, Technical Report STAN-CS-71-190. Stanford University, Computer Science Department (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hopcroft, J.E., Ullman, J.D.: Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages and Computation. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Gramlich, G., Schnitger, G.: Minimizing NFAs and regular expressions. In: Diekert, V., Durand, B. (eds.) STACS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3404, pp. 399–411. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Valdats, M. (2011). Transition Function Complexity of Finite Automata. In: Holzer, M., Kutrib, M., Pighizzini, G. (eds) Descriptional Complexity of Formal Systems. DCFS 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6808. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22600-7_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22600-7_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22599-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22600-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics