Abstract
Ontologies are increasingly being used to address the problems of heterogeneous data sources. This has in turn often led to the challenge of heterogeneity between ontologies themselves. Semantic Matching has been seen as a potential solution to resolving ambiguities between ontologies . Whilst generic algorithms have proved successful in fields with little domain specific terminology, they have often struggled to be accurate in areas such as medicine which have their own highly specialised terminology. The MedMatch algorithm was initially created to apply semantic matching in the medical domain through the use of a domain specific background resource. This paper compares a domain specific algorithm (MedMatch) against a generic (S-Match) matching technique, before considering if MedMatch can be tailored to work with other background resources. It is concluded that this is possible, raising the prospect of domain specific semantic matching in the future.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Giunchiglia, F., Shvaiko, P.: Semantic Matching. The Knowledge Engineering Review 18(3), 265–280 (2003)
Sartor, G., Casanovas, P., Casellas, N., Rubino, R.: Computable models of the law and ICT: State of the art and trends in european research. In: Casanovas, P., Sartor, G., Casellas, N., Rubino, R. (eds.) Computable Models of the Law. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4884, pp. 1–20. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Beisswanger, E., et al.: BioTop: An upper domain ontology for the life sciences: A description of its current structure, contents and interfaces to OBO ontologies. Appl. Ontol. 3, 205–212 (2008)
Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology Matching. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Berners-Lee, T., et al.: The Semantic Web. Scientific American 284(5), 35–43 (2001)
Stoilos, G., Stamou, G., Kollias, S.D.: A String Metric for Ontology Alignment. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 624–637. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Doan, A., et al.: Ontology Matching: A Machine Learning Approach. In: Handbook on Ontologies in Information Systems, pp. 385–403 (2004)
Madhavan, J., et al.: Generic schema matching using cupid. In: 27th International Conference on VLDB, pp. 49–58 (2001)
Tan, H., Jakonienė, V., Lambrix, P., Aberg, J., Shahmehri, N.: Alignment of Biomedical Ontologies Using Life Science Literature. In: Bremer, E.G., Hakenberg, J., Han, E.-H(S.), Berrar, D., Dubitzky, W. (eds.) KDLL 2006. LNCS (LNBI), vol. 3886, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Risto, G., et al.: Using Google Distance to Weight Approximate Ontology Matches. In: BNACI 2007 (2007)
Giunchiglia, F., et al.: Semantic Matching: Algorithms and Implementation. Journal on Data Semantics 9, 1–38 (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Shamdasani, J., Bloodsworth, P., Munir, K., Rahmouni, H.B., McClatchey, R. (2011). MedMatch – Towards Domain Specific Semantic Matching. In: Andrews, S., Polovina, S., Hill, R., Akhgar, B. (eds) Conceptual Structures for Discovering Knowledge. ICCS 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6828. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22688-5_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22688-5_33
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22687-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22688-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)