Skip to main content

Students’ Perceptions of Different Delivery Methods in Hybrid Language Learning

  • Conference paper
Hybrid Learning (ICHL 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6837))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2119 Accesses

Abstract

In the last decade, a wide variety of computer applications for language learning have been introduced into Japanese educational settings. According to this recent trend, various computer-based courseware or commercial software for language learning plays an indispensable role in higher educational organizations. However, not enough research has been done concerning which and how courseware can be adapted to the particular students’ needs and skills. Even the instructor is often unaware of what methodological approaches work well for students’ needs. The present study aims at understanding how Japanese students view certain courseware when they use it and determine how the courseware should be incorporated into the hybrid language learning environment. The study focuses on a hybrid English learning course offered to improve students’ scores in The Test of English for International Communication (TOEIC®). The results of this study provide instructors with many insights into how to facilitate hybrid learning for students using courseware. The results also suggest some significant implications concerning how to maximize the effectiveness of hybrid learning for future language learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Sharma, P., Barrett, B.: Blended Learning. Using Technology in and beyond the Language Classroom. Macmillan Education, Oxford (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pagel, J., Reedy, L.: Integrating e-Learning in all English classes: Success at the half-way point of a 5-year project. The JALT CALL Journal 3(3), 94–109 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. An Invitation to CALL. Foundations of Computer-Assisted Language Learning. Linguistics Department, Stanford University, http://www.stanford.edu/~efs/callcourse/ (retrieved February 20, 2011)

  4. Hinkelman, D., Grose, T.: Placement Testing and Audio Quiz-Making With Open Source Software. In: Proceedings of CLaSIC. CLS International Conference (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Reedy, D., Pagel, J.: Integrating e-Learning into an English curriculum. Selected Proceedings of The Thirteenth Annual JALT CALL SIG Conference, pp. 97–101 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chia, C.: Autonomy in Language Learning. The Use of IT and Internet Resources. McGraw-Hill Education, Singapore (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Trends Survey of TOEIC® test Utilization 2007. The TOEIC Steering Committee of the Institute for International Business Communication. Educational Testing Service, Tokyo (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Garant, M.: EFL Testing and University Admission in Finland and Japan. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching 10, 115–135 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brown, I., Campbell, A.P., Weatherford, Y.: Using DynEd and Alc with low-level university freshmen. The JALT CALL Journal 4(3), 37–53 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bringham, S., Larson, E.: Using CALL as the major element of study for a university English class in Japan. The JALT CALL Journal 2(3), 39–52 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wolff, D.: Computers and new technologies: Will they change language learning and teaching? In: Kohn, J., Ruschoff, B., Wolff, D. (eds.) New horizons in CALL, Proceedings of EuroCALL 1996, vol. 96, pp. 65–82. Szombathely, Hungary (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hubbard, P.: An integrated framework for CALL courseware evaluation. CALICO Journal 6(2), 51–72 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yamaguchi, M., et al.: The TOEIC test trainer target 650. Ask Co., Ltd. (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. TOEIC® Test Super Practice Exam 730. CHIeru

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jarvis, H., Szymczyk, M.: Student views on learning grammar with web- and book-based materials. ELT Journal 64(1), 32–44 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Enright, M.K., Grabe, W., Koda, K., Mosenthal, P., Mulcahy-Ernt, O., Schedl, M.: TOEFL 2000 reading framework: A working paper (TOEFL Monograph No. MS-17). ETS, Princeton, NJ (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Thomas, M., Reinders, H.: Task-Based Language Learning and Teaching with Technology. Continuum, London (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hirata, Y., Hirata, Y. (2011). Students’ Perceptions of Different Delivery Methods in Hybrid Language Learning. In: Kwan, R., Fong, J., Kwok, Lf., Lam, J. (eds) Hybrid Learning. ICHL 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6837. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22763-9_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22763-9_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22762-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22763-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics