Skip to main content

ONE: A Predictable and Scalable DW Model

  • Conference paper
Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery (DaWaK 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6862))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The star schema model has been widely used as the facto DW storage organization on relational database management systems (RDBMS). The physical division in normalized fact tables (with metrics) and denormalized dimension tables allows a trade-off between performance and storage space while, at the same time offering a simple business understanding of the overall model as a set of metrics (facts) and attributes for business analysis (dimensions). However, the underlying premises of such trade-off between performance and storage have changed. Nowadays, storage capacity increased significantly at affordable prices (below 50$/terabyte) with improved transfer rates, and faster random access times particularly with modern SSD disks. In this paper we evaluate if the underlying premises of the star schema model storage organization still upholds. We propose an alternative storage organization (called ONE) that physically stores the whole star schema into a single relation, providing a predictable and scalable alternative to the star schema model. We use the TPC-H benchmark to evaluate ONE and the star schema model, assessing both the required storage size and query execution time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Pavlo, A., et al.: A comparison of approaches to large-scale data analysis. In: Proceedings of the 35th SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pp. 165–178 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Patel, J.M., Carey, M.J., Vernon, M.K.: Accurate modeling of the hybrid hash join algorithm. In: ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, NY, USA (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  3. DeWitt, D.J., Katz, R.H., Olken, F., Shapiro, L.D., Stonebraker, M.R., Wood, D.A.: Implementation techniques for main memory database systems. In: ACM SIGMOD Record, New York, NY, USA, pp. 1–8 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Harris, E.P., Ramamohanarao, K.: Join algorithm costs revisited. The VLDB Journal — The International Journal on Very Large Data Bases 5, 064–084 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson, T.: Performance Measurements of Compressed Bitmap Indices. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, pp. 278–289 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhou, J., Larson, P.-A., Goldstein, J., Ding, L.: Dynamic Materialized Views. In: International Conference on Data Engineering, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, pp. 526–535 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Costa, J.P., Furtado, P.: Time-Stratified Sampling for Approximate Answers to Aggregate Queries. In: International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, p. 215 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stonebraker, M., et al.: C-store: a column-oriented DBMS. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, pp. 553–564 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang, Y., Hu, W., Wang, S.: MOSS-DB: a hardware-aware OLAP database. In: Proc. 11th International Conference on Web-Age Information Management, pp. 582–594 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yma, P.: A Framework for Systematic Database Denormalization. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology 9(4) (August 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sanders, G.L.: Denormalization Effects on Performance of RDBMS. In: Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zaker, M., Phon-Amnuaisuk, S., Haw, S.-C.: Optimizing the data warehouse design by hierarchical denormalizing. In: Proc. 8th Conference on Applied Computer Science (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. O’Neil, P., O’Neil, E., Chen, X., Revilak, S.: The Star Schema Benchmark and Augmented Fact Table Indexing. In: Nambiar, R., Poess, M. (eds.) TPCTC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5895, pp. 237–252. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kimball, R., Ross, M., Thornthwaite, W., Mundy, J., Becker, B.: The Data Warehouse Lifecycle Toolkit, 2nd edn. Wiley Publishing, Chichester (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. “PostgreSQL”, http://www.postgresql.org/

  16. “TPC-H Benchmark”, http://www.tpc.org/tpch/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Costa, J.P., Cecílio, J., Martins, P., Furtado, P. (2011). ONE: A Predictable and Scalable DW Model. In: Cuzzocrea, A., Dayal, U. (eds) Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery. DaWaK 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6862. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23544-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23544-3_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23543-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23544-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics