Skip to main content

To Re-rank or to Re-query: Can Visual Analytics Solve This Dilemma?

  • Conference paper
Multilingual and Multimodal Information Access Evaluation (CLEF 2011)

Abstract

Evaluation has a crucial role in (IR) since it allows for identifying possible points of failure of an IR approach, thus addressing them to improve its effectiveness. Developing tools to support researchers and analysts when analyzing results and investigating strategies to improve IR system performance can help make the analysis easier and more effective. In this paper we discuss a VA-based approach to support the analyst when deciding whether or not to investigate re-ranking to improve the system effectiveness measured after a retrieval run. Our approach is based on effectiveness measures that exploit graded relevance judgements and it provides both a principled and intuitive way to support analysis. A prototype is described and exploited to discuss some case studies based on TREC data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Harman, D., Buckley, C.: Overview of the Reliable Information Access Workshop. Information Retrieval 12, 615–641 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Järvelin, K., Kekäläinen, J.: Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques. ACM Transactions on Information System 20, 422–446 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Keskustalo, H., Järvelin, K., Pirkola, A., Kekäläinen, J.: Intuition-supporting visualization of user’s performance based on explicit negative higher-order relevance. In: Proceedings of SIGIR 2008, pp. 675–682. ACM, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Teevan, J., Dumais, S.T., Horvitz, E.: Potential for personalization. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 17, 1–31 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Keim, D., Andrienko, G., Fekete, J.D., Görg, C., Kohlhammer, J., Melançon, G.: Information visualization, pp. 154–175. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Card, S.K., Mackinlay, J.: The structure of the information visualization design space. In: Proceedings of InfoVis 1997, pp. 92–99. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shneiderman, B.: The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In: Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages, pp. 336–343. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Keim, D., Kohlhammer, J., Santucci, G., Mansmann, F., Wanner, F., Schäfer, M.: Visual Analytics Challenges. In: Proceedings of the eChallenges 2009 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Seo, J., Shneiderman, B.: A rank-by-feature framework for interactive exploration of multidimensional data. Information Visualization 4, 96–113 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Derthick, M., Christel, M.G., Hauptmann, A.G., Wactlar, H.D.: Constant density displays using diversity sampling. In: Proceedings of InfoVis 2003, pp. 137–144. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Banks, D., Over, P., Zhang, N.-F.: Blind Men and Elephants: Six Approaches to TREC data. Information Retrieval 1, 7–34 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sormunen, E., Hokkanen, S., Kangaslampi, P., Pyy, P., Sepponen, B.: Query performance analyser -: a web-based tool for ir research and instruction. In: Proceedings of SIGIR 2002, p. 450. ACM, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ferro, N., Sabetta, A., Santucci, G., Tino, G., Veltri, F.: Visual comparison of Ranked Result Cumulated Gains. In: Proceedings of EuroVA 2011 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Di Buccio, E., Dussin, M., Ferro, N., Masiero, I., Santucci, G., Tino, G.: Interactive analysis and exploration of experimental evaluation results. In: Proceedings of EuroHCIR 2011 (to appear, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Melucci, M.: Weighted rank correlation in information retrieval evaluation. In: Lee, G.G., Song, D., Lin, C.-Y., Aizawa, A., Kuriyama, K., Yoshioka, M., Sakai, T. (eds.) AIRS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5839, pp. 75–86. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Di Buccio, E., Dussin, M., Ferro, N., Masiero, I., Santucci, G., Tino, G. (2011). To Re-rank or to Re-query: Can Visual Analytics Solve This Dilemma?. In: Forner, P., Gonzalo, J., Kekäläinen, J., Lalmas, M., de Rijke, M. (eds) Multilingual and Multimodal Information Access Evaluation. CLEF 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6941. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23708-9_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23708-9_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23707-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23708-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics