Abstract
Didactic learning that follows the “traditional” model of a teacher-student relationship is often considered completely different from collaborative learning. As a result, few studies have explored the potential to effectively connect these two forms of learning. Nevertheless, in practice, a well-thought-out linkage between these different approaches is essential to leverage and facilitate the learning process. Thus, in this paper, we propose an ontological model that captures the similarity between the two forms of learning, with a focus on participants’ interactions. One of the benefits of this model is the creation of a flexible framework to describe learning independently of the approach used to learn. Second, it also enables us to describe the design rationale of learning scenarios and to organize theoretical knowledge for designing such scenarios in the same manner. To validate this model, we show its advantages with the examination in modeling theories for didactic and collaborative learning, and describe the development of an authoring tool for learning design that uses the model to facilitate the design of theory-based blended learning scenarios.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carr-Chellman, A.A., Hoadley, C.M.: Looking back and looking forward. Educational Technology 44(3), 57–59 (2004)
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt: Anchored Instruction in Science Education. In: Duschl, R., Hamilton, R. (eds.) Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Psychology, and Educational Theory and Practice, pp. 244–273. SUNY Press, Albany (1992)
Devedzic, V.: Semantic Web & Education. Springer Science Business Media, Heidelberg (2006)
Dicheva, D.: O4E: Ontologies for Education, http://compsci.wssu.edu/iis/nsdl/
Dick, W., Carey, L., Carey, J.O.: The systematic design of instruction, 5th edn. Addison-Wesley Educational Publisher Inc., Reading (2001)
Endsley, W.R.: Peer tutorial instruction. Educational Technology, Englewood Cliffs (1980)
Harrer, A.: An Approach to Organize Re-usability of Learning Designs and Collaboration Scripts of Various Granularities. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), pp. 164–168 (2006)
Hayashi, Y., Bourdeau, J., Mizoguchi, R.: Ontological Support for a Theory-Eclectic Approach to Instructional and Learning Design. In: Nejdl, W., Tochtermann, K. (eds.) EC-TEL 2006. LNCS, vol. 4227, pp. 155–169. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Hayashi, Y., Bourdeau, J., Mizoguchi, R.: Using Ontological Engineering to Organize Learning/Instructional Theories and Build a Theory-Aware Authoring System. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 19(2), 211–252 (2009)
Hayashi, Y., Kasai, T., Mizoguchi, R.: Ontological Modeling for Reflective Instructional Design: A Case Study on Modeling a Lesson Plan. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE), pp. 25–32 (2010)
Hernandez-Leo, D., et al.: COLLAGE: A collaborative Learning Design editor based on patterns. Educational Technology and Society 9(1), 58–71 (2006)
Inaba, A., Ikeda, M., Mizoguchi, R.: How Can We Form Effective Collaborative Learning Groups? - Therotical of Opportunistic Group Formation With Ontological Engineering. In: Gauthier, G., VanLehn, K., Frasson, C. (eds.) ITS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1839, pp. 282–291. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Isotani, S., Mizoguchi, R.: Deployment of Ontologies for an Effective Design of Collaborative Learning Scenarios. In: Haake, J.M., Ochoa, S.F., Cechich, A. (eds.) CRIWG 2007. LNCS, vol. 4715, pp. 223–238. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Isotani, S., Inaba, A., Ikeda, M., Mizoguchi, R.: An Ontology Engineering Approach to the Realization of Theory-Driven Group Formation. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 4(4), 445–478 (2009)
Isotani, S., Mizoguchi, R., Isotani, S., Capeli, O.M., Isotani, N., de Albuquerque, A.R.P.L.: An Authoring Tool to Support the Design and Use of Theory-Based Collaborative Learning Activities. In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds.) ITS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6095, pp. 92–102. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
LAMS Foundation, LAMS (Learning Activity Management System), http://www.lamsfoundation.org/
Mizoguchi, R., Bourdeau, J.: Using Ontological Engineering to Overcome Common AI-ED Problems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 11(2), 107–121 (2000)
Reigeluth, C.M.: What Is Instructional-Design Theory and How Is It Changing? In: Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah (1999)
Reigeluth, C.M., Carr-Chellman, A.A.: Understanding Instructional Theory. In: Instructional-design theories and models: Building a Common Knowledge Base, pp. 3–26. Routledge, New York (2009)
Spiro, R.J., Coulson, R.L., Feltovich, P.J., Anderson, D.K.: Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In: Proceedings of Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 375–383 (1988)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hayashi, Y., Isotani, S., Bourdeau, J., Mizoguchi, R. (2011). An Ontological Model to Blend Didactic Instruction and Collaborative Learning. In: Vivacqua, A.S., Gutwin, C., Borges, M.R.S. (eds) Collaboration and Technology. CRIWG 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6969. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23801-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23801-7_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23800-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23801-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)