Skip to main content

An Approach to Measure Quality of Knowledge in the e-Decisional Community

  • Conference paper
Knowlege-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems (KES 2011)

Abstract

Sharing knowledge is an activity that can improve an organization’s ability to make better decisions and adapt faster to unexpected situations. As a consequence, using measures to determine the quality of the knowledge that is shared by individuals and enterprises will improve decision-making processes and the accuracy of their outcomes. This paper presents a new approach for measuring quality of knowledge in the e-Decisional Community, an integrated knowledge sharing platform that aims at the creation of markets where knowledge is provided as a service.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bontis, N.: Assessing knowledge assets: a review of the models used to measure intellectual capital. International Journal of Management Reviews 3(1), 41–60 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Darroch, J.: Developing a measure of knowledge management behaviors and practices. Journal of Knowledge Management 7(5), 41–54 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Davenport, T.H., Prusak, L.: Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business Press, Boston (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fox, C., Levitin, A., Thomas, R.: The notion of data and its quality dimensions. Inf. Process. Manage. 30(1), 9–19 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hunt, D.P.: The concept of knowledge and how to measure it. Journal of Intellectual Capital 4(1), 100–113 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee, J., Lee, Y., Ryu, Y., Kang, T.H.: Information Quality Drivers of KMS. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Convergence Information Technology, 2007, pp. 1494–1499 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Linderman, K., Schroeder, R.G., Zaheer, S., Liedtke, C., Choo, A.S.: Integrating quality management practices with knowledge creation processes. Journal of Operations Management 22(6), 589–607 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. List, B., Schiefer, J., Bruckner, R.M.: Measuring knowledge with workflow management systems. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, pp. 467–471 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mancilla-Amaya, L., Sanín, C., Szczerbicki, E.: Knowledge-Based Virtual Organizations for the E-Decisional Community. In: Setchi, R., Jordanov, I., Howlett, R., Jain, L. (eds.) KES 2010. LNCS, vol. 6277, pp. 553–562. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Mancilla-Amaya, L., Sanín, C., Szczerbicki, E.: Smart Knowledge-Sharing Platform For E-Decisional Community. Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal 41(1), 17–30 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Molina, L.M., Lloréns-Montes, J., Ruiz-Moreno, A.: Relationship between quality management practices and knowledge transfer. Journal of Operations Management 25(3), 682–701 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pipino, L.L., Lee, Y.W., Wang, R.Y.: Data quality assessment. Commun. ACM 45(4), 211–218 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sanin, C.: Decisional DNA and the Smart Knowledge Management System: Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management applied to an Intelligent Platform. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, Berlin (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Seawright, K.W., Young, S.T.: A Quality Definition Continuum. Interfaces 26(3), 107–113 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Steedman, I.: On ’Measuring’ Knowledge in New (Endogenous) Growth Theory. Old and New Growth Theories: An Assessment, pp. 127–133 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Supekar, K., Patel, C., Lee, Y.: Characterizing quality of knowledge on semantic web. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Florida AI Research Symposium (FLAIRS 2004), Miami Beach, Florida, pp. 220–228 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. symja: A Java computer algebra system, http://code.google.com/p/symja/ (last accessed: April 5, 2011)

  18. Java Agent DEvelopment Framework, http://jade.tilab.com/ (last accessed: April 4, 2011)

  19. Tongchuay, C., Praneetpolgrang, P.: Knowledge Quality and Quality Metrics in Knowledge Management Systems. Special Issue of the International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management 16(SP3), 21.21–21.26 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Statcato: Free Software for Elementary Statistics, http://www.statcato.org/ (last accessed: April 5, 2011)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mancilla-Amaya, L., Sanín, C., Szczerbicki, E. (2011). An Approach to Measure Quality of Knowledge in the e-Decisional Community. In: König, A., Dengel, A., Hinkelmann, K., Kise, K., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds) Knowlege-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. KES 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6882. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23863-5_63

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23863-5_63

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23862-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23863-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics