Abstract
Low contrast of the prostate gland, heterogeneous intensity distribution inside the prostate region, imaging artifacts like shadow regions, speckle and significant variations in prostate shape, size and inter dataset contrast in Trans Rectal Ultrasound (TRUS) images challenge computer aided automatic or semi-automatic segmentation of the prostate. In this paper, we propose a probabilistic framework for automatic initialization and propagation of multiple mean parametric models derived from principal component analysis of shape and posterior probability information of the prostate region to segment the prostate. Unlike traditional statistical models of shape and intensity priors we use posterior probability of the prostate region to build our texture model of the prostate and use the information in initialization and propagation of the mean model. Furthermore, multiple mean models are used compared to a single mean model to improve segmentation accuracies. The proposed method achieves mean Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) value of 0.97±0.01, and mean Mean Absolute Distance (MAD) value of 0.49±0.20 mm when validated with 23 datasets with considerable shape, size, and intensity variations, in a leave-one-patient-out validation framework. The model achieves statistically significant t-test p-value<0.0001 in mean DSC and mean MAD values compared to traditional statistical models of shape and texture. Introduction of the probabilistic information of the prostate region and multiple mean models into the traditional statistical shape and texture model framework, significantly improve the segmentation accuracies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Prostate Cancer Statistics - Key Facts (2011), http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/types/prostate (accessed on June 6, 2011)
Badiei, S., Salcudean, S.E., Varah, J., Morris, W.J.: Prostate segmentation in 2D ultrasound images using image warping and ellipse fitting. In: Larsen, R., Nielsen, M., Sporring, J. (eds.) MICCAI 2006. LNCS, vol. 4191, pp. 17–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Betrouni, N., Vermandel, M., Pasquier, D., Maouche, S., Rousseau, J.: Segmentation of Abdominal Ultrasound Images of the Prostate Using A priori Information and an Adapted Noise Filter. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 29, 43–51 (2005)
Cootes, T.F., Hill, A., Taylor, C.J., Haslam, J.: The Use of Active Shape Model for Locating Structures in Medical Images. Image and Vision Computing 12, 355–366 (1994)
Cootes, T.F., Edwards, G.J., Taylor, C.J.: Active appearance models. In: Burkhardt, H., Neumann, B. (eds.) ECCV 1998. LNCS, vol. 1407, pp. 484–498. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
Cosío, F.A.: Automatic Initialization of an Active Shape Model of the Prostate. Medical Image Analysis 12, 469–483 (2008)
Diaz, K., Castaneda, B.: Semi-automated Segmentation of the Prostate Gland Boundary in Ultrasound Images Using a Machine Learning Approach. In: Reinhardt, J.M., Pluim, J.P.W. (eds.) Procedings of SPIE Medical Imaging: Image Processing, pp. 1–8. SPIE, USA (2008)
Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E., Stork, D.G.: Pattern Classification, 2nd edn. Wiley Interscience, USA (2000)
Ghose, S., Oliver, A., Martí, R., Lladó, X., Freixenet, J., Vilanova, J.C., Meriaudeau, F.: Texture guided active appearance model propagation for prostate segmentation. In: Madabhushi, A., Dowling, J., Yan, P., Fenster, A., Abolmaesumi, P., Hata, N. (eds.) MICCAI 2010. LNCS, vol. 6367, pp. 111–120. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Gower, J.C.: Generalized Procrustes Analysis. Psychometrika 40, 33–51 (1975)
Ladak, H.M., Mao, F., Wang, Y., Downey, D.B., Steinman, D.A., Fenster, A.: Prostate Segmentation from 2D Ultrasound Images. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 3188–3191. IEEE Computer Society Press, Chicago (2000)
Liu, H., Cheng, G., Rubens, D., Strang, J.G., Liao, L., Brasacchio, R., Messing, E., Yu, Y.: Automatic Segmentation of Prostate Boundaries in Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Imaging. In: Sonka, M., Fitzpatrick, J.M. (eds.) Proceedings of the SPIE Medical Imaging: Image Processings, pp. 412–423. SPIE, USA (2002)
MICCAI: prostate segmentation challenge MICCAI (2009), http://wiki.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php (accessed on April 1, 2011)
Shen, D., Zhan, Y., Davatzikos, C.: Segmentation of Prostate Boundaries from Ultrasound Images Using Statistical Shape Model. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 22, 539–551 (2003)
Yan, P., Xu, S., Turkbey, B., Kruecker, J.: Discrete Deformable Model Guided by Partial Active Shape Model for TRUS Image Segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 57, 1158–1166 (2010)
Zhan, Y., Shen, D.: Deformable Segmentation of 3D Ultrasound Prostate Images Using Statistical Texture Matching Method. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 25, 256–272 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ghose, S. et al. (2011). Multiple Mean Models of Statistical Shape and Probability Priors for Automatic Prostate Segmentation. In: Madabhushi, A., Dowling, J., Huisman, H., Barratt, D. (eds) Prostate Cancer Imaging. Image Analysis and Image-Guided Interventions. Prostate Cancer Imaging 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6963. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23944-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23944-1_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23943-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23944-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)