Skip to main content

Transitivity and Negative Transitivity in the Fuzzy Setting

  • Conference paper
Eurofuse 2011

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing ((AINSC,volume 107))

Abstract

A (crisp) binary relation is transitive if and only if its dual relation is negatively transitive. In preference modelling, if a weak preference relation is complete, the associated strict preference relation is its dual relation. It follows from here this well-known result: given a complete weak preference relation, it is transitive if and only if its strict preference relation is negatively transitive.

In the context of fuzzy relations, transitivity is traditionally defined by a t-norm and negative transitivity, by a t-conorm. In this setting, it is also well known that a (valued) binary relation is T-transitive if and only if its dual relation is negatively S-transitive where S stands for the dual t-conorm of the t-norm T. However, in this context there are several proposals to get the strict preference relation from the weak preference relation. Also, there are different definitions of completeness. In this contribution we depart from a reflexive fuzzy relation. We assume that this relation is transitive with respect to a conjunctor (a generalization of t-norms). We consider almost all the possible generators and therefore all the possible strict preference relations obtained from the reflexive relation and we provide a general expression for the negative transitivity that those relations satisfy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arrow, K.J.: Social Choice and Individual Values. Wiley, Chichester (1951)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bodenhofer, U., Klawonn, F.: A formal study of linearity axioms for fuzzy orderings. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 145, 323–354 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. De Baets, B., Fodor, J.: Twenty years of fuzzy preference structures (1978-1997. Belg. J. Oper. Res. Statist. Comput. Sci. 37, 61–82 (1997)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. De Baets, B., Fodor, J.: Additive fuzzy preference structures: the next generation. In: De Baets, B., Fodor, J. (eds.) Principles of Fuzzy Preference Modelling and Decision Making, pp. 15–25. Academic Press, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. De Baets, B., Van de Walle, B.: Minimal definitions of classical and fuzzy preference structures. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, USA, Syracuse, New York, pp. 299–304 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Díaz, S., De Baets, B., Montes, S.: Additive decomposition of fuzzy pre-orders. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 158, 830–842 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Díaz, S., De Baets, B., Montes, S.: On the compositional characterization of complete fuzzy pre-orders. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 159, 2221–2239 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Díaz, S., De Baets, B., Montes, S.: General results on the decomposition of transitive fuzzy relations. Fzzy Optim. Decis. Making 9, 1–29 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Díaz, S., Montes, S., De Baets, B.: Transitive decomposition of fuzzy preference relations: the case of nilpotent minimum. Kybernetika 40, 71–88 (2004)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Díaz, S., Montes, S., De Baets, B.: Transitivity bounds in additive fuzzy preference structures. IEEE Trans. on Fuzzy Systems 15, 275–286 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fishburn, P.C.: Utility Theory for Decision Making. Wiley, New York (1970)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Fodor, J., Roubens, M.: Fuzzy Preference Modelling and Multicriteria Decision Support. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Klement, E.P., Mesiar, R., Pap, E.: Triangular Norms. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Roubens, M., Vincke, P.: Preference Modelling. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 76. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Van de Walle, B., De Baets, B., Kerre, E.: A plea for the use of Łukasiewicz triplets in the definition of fuzzy preference structures. Part 1: General argumentation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 97, 349–359 (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Van de Walle, B., De Baets, B., Kerre, E.: Characterizable fuzzy preference structures. Annals of Operations Research 80, 105–136 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Díaz, S., De Baets, B., Montes, S. (2011). Transitivity and Negative Transitivity in the Fuzzy Setting. In: Melo-Pinto, P., Couto, P., Serôdio, C., Fodor, J., De Baets, B. (eds) Eurofuse 2011. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, vol 107. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24001-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24001-0_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24000-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24001-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics