Skip to main content

Construction of Interval-Valued Fuzzy Preference Relations Using Ignorance Functions: Interval-Valued Non Dominance Criterion

  • Conference paper
Eurofuse 2011

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing ((AINSC,volume 107))

Abstract

In this work we present a construction method for interval-valued fuzzy preference relations from a fuzzy preference relation and the representation of the lack of knowledge or ignorance that experts suffer when they define the membership values of the elements of that fuzzy preference relation.We also prove that, with this construction method, we obtain membership intervals for an element which length is equal to the ignorance associated with that element. We then propose a generalization of Orlovsky’s non dominance method to solve decision making problems using interval-valued fuzzy preference relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. De Baets, B., Van de Walle, B., Kerre, E.: Fuzzy preference structures without incomparability. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 76 (3), 333–348 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bilgiç, T.: Interval-valued preference structures. European Journal of Operational Research 105 (1), 162–183 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Chiclana, F., Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E.: Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 97, 33–48 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bustince, H., Pagola, M., Barrenechea, E., Fernandez, J., Melo-Pinto, P., Couto, P., Tizhoosh, H.R., Montero, J.: Ignorance functions. An application to the calculation of the threshold in prostate ultrasound images. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 161 (1), 20–36 (2010)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Deschrijver, G., Cornelis, C., Kerre, E.E.: On the representation of intuitionistic fuzzy T-norms and T-conorms. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 12(1), 45–61 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Fernández, A., Calderón, M., Barrenechea, E., Bustince, H., Herrera, F.: Solving multi-class problems with linguistic fuzzy rule based classification systems based on pairwise learning and preference relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 161(23), 3064–3080 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Fodor, J., Roubens, M.: Fuzzy Preference Modelling and Multicriteria Decision Support. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. González-Pachón, J., Gómez, D., Montero, J., Yáñez, J.: Searching for the dimension of valued preference relations. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 33 (2), 133–157 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Herrera, F., Martínez, L., Sánchez, P.J.: Managing non-homogeneous information in group decision making. European Journal of Operational Research 166 (1), 115–132 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Hüllermeier, E., Brinker, K.: Learning valued preference structures for solving classification problems. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 159(18), 2337–2352 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Kacprzyk, J.: Group decision making with a fuzzy linguistic majority. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 18(2), 105–118 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Montero, F.J., Tejada, J.: Some problems on the definition of fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 20, 45–53 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Montero, F.J., Tejada, J.: A necessary and sufficient condition for existence of Orlovsky’s choice set. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 26, 121–125 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Orlovsky, S.A.: Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1 (3), 155–167 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Ovchinnikov, S.V., Roubens, M.: On Strict Preference Relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 43 (3), 319–326 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Ovchinnikov, S.V., Ozernoy, V.M.: Using fuzzy binary relations for identifying noninferior decision alternatives. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 25 (1), 21–32 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Perny, P., Roy, B.: The use of fuzzy outranking relations in preference modelling. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 49, 33–53 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Roubens, M., Vincke, P.: Preference Modelling. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 250. Springer, Berlin (1985)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Sambuc, J.: Function Φ-Flous, Application a l’aide au Diagnostic en Pathologie Thyroidienne. These de Doctorat en Medicine, Marseille (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sanz, J., Fernández, A., Bustince, H., Herrera, F.: A genetic tuning to improve the performance of fuzzy rule-based classification systems with interval-valued fuzzy sets: degree of ignorance and lateral position. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (2011); doi:10.1016/j.ijar.2011.01.011

    Google Scholar 

  21. Szmidt, E., Kacprzyk, J.: Using intuitionistic fuzzy sets in group decision making. Control and Cybernetics 31, 1037–1053 (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Szmidt, E., Kacprzyk, J.: A consensus-reaching process under intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 18(7), 837–852 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu, Z.: On compatibility of interval fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making 3 (3), 217–225 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Xu, Z., Yager, R.R.: Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. International Journal of General Systems 35, 417–433 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Xu, Z.: A method based on distance measure for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making. Information Sciences 180 (1), 181–190 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Information Control 8, 338–353 (1965)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Zadeh, L.A.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning I. Information Sciences 8, 199–249 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Barrenechea, E., Fernández, A., Herrera, F., Bustince, H. (2011). Construction of Interval-Valued Fuzzy Preference Relations Using Ignorance Functions: Interval-Valued Non Dominance Criterion. In: Melo-Pinto, P., Couto, P., Serôdio, C., Fodor, J., De Baets, B. (eds) Eurofuse 2011. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, vol 107. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24001-0_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24001-0_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24000-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24001-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics