Skip to main content

Conditional Ought, a Game Theoretical Perspective

  • Conference paper
Logic, Rationality, and Interaction (LORI 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6953))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper presents a new consequentialist deontic logic in which the relation of preference over sets of possible worlds and the relation of conditional dominance are both transitive. This logic validate the principle that absolute ought can be derived from conditional ought whenever the conditional statement is the agent’s absolute ought. Ought about conditionals is not implied by conditional ought in this logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, A.: On the logic of commitment. Philosophical Studies 10(1959), 23–27 (1959)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aqvist, L.: Deontic logic. Handbook of Philosophical Logic 2(1994), 147–264 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  3. van Benthem, J., Grossi, D., Fenrong, L.: On the two faces of deontics: Semantic betterness and syntactic priority (2011) (manuscript)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blackburn, P., Rijke, M., Venema, Y.: Modal Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Horty, J.: Agency and Deontic Logic. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Kooi, B., Tamminga, A.: Conditioanl obligations in strategic situations. In: Boella, G., Pigozzi, G., Singh, M., Verhagen, H. (eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Normative Multiagent Systems (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kooi, B., Tamminga, A.: Moral conflicts between groups of agents. Journal of Philosophical Logic 37(2008), 1–21 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Loohuis, L.: Obligations in a responsible world. In: He, X., Horty, J., Pacuit, E. (eds.) LORI 2009. LNCS, vol. 5834, pp. 251–262. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Osborne, M., Rubinstein, A.: A Course in Game Theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Pacuit, E., Parikh, R., Cogan, E.: The logic of knowledge based obligation. Synthese 149(2006), 311–341 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Tamminga, A.: Deontic logic for strategic games (2011) (manuscript)

    Google Scholar 

  12. van der Torre, L.: Reasoning about Obligations: Defeasibility in Preference-based Deontic Logic. Phd thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sun, X. (2011). Conditional Ought, a Game Theoretical Perspective. In: van Ditmarsch, H., Lang, J., Ju, S. (eds) Logic, Rationality, and Interaction. LORI 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6953. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24130-7_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24130-7_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24129-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24130-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics