Abstract
In the development of SW applications, the workflow abstraction gives primary relevance to the way how some process can be accomplished through a sequence of connected steps. This largely conditions analysis, implementation architecture, and verification. In particular, testing activities are naturally oriented towards a data flow approach, which effectively exercises dependencies among steps. In several application scenarios, the workflow model cannot completely determine the sequencing of actions and it must rather leave space to variability. While easily encompassed both in the analysis and implementation stages, this comprises a major hurdle for the testing stage due to the explosion in the number of allowed execution orders and paths.
We address the problem reporting on the verification of the control software of a Computer Assisted Surgery system. In this case, the workflow abstraction captures the constraints of a medical protocol, and variability in the order of steps reflects dynamic adaptation of the course of actions to the specific characteristics of each patient. This largely increases the testing effort needed to accomplish the prescriptions of the IEC-62304 certification standard. To cope with the problem, we show how data flow analysis can be used to identify an appropriate set of constraints that can be exploited in the verification stage, so as to reduce the test suite while preserving coverage.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
International Electrotechnical Commission: Medical device software - Software life-cycle processes, IEC62304:2006 (2006)
Georgakopoulos, D., Hornick, M., Sheth, A.: An overview of workflow management: From process modeling to workflow automation infrastructure. Distributed and Parallel Databases 3(2), 119–153 (1995)
Fowler, M., Scott, K.: UML distilled (3rd ed.): a brief guide to the standard object modeling language, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley Professional, Reading (September 25, 2003) ISBN:978-0321193681
Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: UML activity diagrams as a workflow specification language. In: Gogolla, M., Kobryn, C. (eds.) UML 2001. LNCS, vol. 2185, pp. 76–90. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Van Der Aalst, W.M., Ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Kiepuszewski, B., Barros, A.P.: Workflow Patterns. Distributed and Parallel Databases 14(1), 5–51 (2003)
Mei, L., Chan, W.K., Tse, T.H.: Data flow testing of service oriented workflow applications. In: ICSE 2008 Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering (2008)
Mei, L., Chan, W.K., Tse, T.H.: An empirical study of the use of Frankl-Weyuker data flow testing criteria to test BPEL Web services. In: 33rd Annual IEEE International Computer Software and Applications Conference (2009)
van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Verification of Workflow Nets. In: Azéma, P., Balbo, G. (eds.) ICATPN 1997. LNCS, vol. 1248, pp. 407–426. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)
Rapps, S., Weyuker, E.J.: Selecting test data using data flow information. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering SE-11(4) (April 1985)
Frankl, P.G., Weiss, S.N.: An experimental comparison of the effectiveness of branch testing and data flow testing. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 19(8) (August 1993)
Sadiq, S.W., Orlowska, M.E., Sadiq, W.: Specification and validation of process constraints for flexible workflows. Information Systems 30(5), 349–378 (2005), doi:10.1016/j.is.2004.05.002, ISSN 0306-4379
Sadiq, S.W., Orlowska, M.E., Lin, J., Sadiq, W.: Quality of Service in flexible workflows through process constraints. In: Enterprise Information Systems, vol. VII, part 3, pp. 187–195 (2006)
Schep, N.W.L., Broeders, I.A.M.J., van der Werken, C.: Computer assisted orthopaedic and trauma surgery: State of the art and future perspectives. Original Research Article Injury 34(4), 299–306 (2003)
Saragaglia, D., Picard, F., Chaussard, C., Montbarbon, E., Leitner, F., Cinquin, P.: Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: comparison with a conventional procedure. Results of 50 cases in a prospective randomized study. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 87(1), 18–28 (2001)
Bathis, H., Perlick, L., Tingart, M., Luring, C., Zurakowski, D., Grifka, J.: Alignment in total knee arthroplasty, A Comparison of Computer-Assisted Surgery with the Conventional Technique. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British 86-B(5), 682–687
Sadiq, S.W., Orlowska, M.E., Sadiq, W., Foulger, C.: Data Flow and Validation in Workflow Modelling. In: ADC 2004, Proceedings of the 15th Australasian Database Conference, vol. 27 (2004)
Binkley, D., Gallagher, K.B.: Program Slicing, Advances in Computers, vol. 43, pp. 1–50. Academic Press, London (1996)
Binder, R.V.: Design for testability in object-oriented systems. Commun. ACM 37(9), 87–101 (1994), R 10.1145/182987.184077
Baudry, B., Le Sunyé, Y., Jézéquel, J.-M.: Towards a ’Safe’ Use of Design Patterns to Improve OO Software Testability. In: Proceeding ISSRE 2001 Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA (2001), table of contents ISBN:0-7695-1306-9
Baudry, B., Le Traon, Y., Sunyé, G.: Testability Analysis of a UML Class Diagram Software Metrics. In: IEEE International Symposium on Eighth IEEE International Symposium on Software Metrics (METRICS 2002), p. 54 (2002)
Gamma, Helm, Johnson, Vlissides: Design Patterns, Element of Reusable Object-Oriented Software, 1st edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1995)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cruciani, F., Vicario, E. (2011). Reducing Complexity of Data Flow Testing in the Verification of a IEC-62304 Flexible Workflow System. In: Flammini, F., Bologna, S., Vittorini, V. (eds) Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security. SAFECOMP 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6894. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24270-0_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24270-0_26
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24269-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24270-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)