Abstract
This paper proposes an automated grading model (AGM) for English text. The AGM combines the Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) with Text Clustering (TC) to measure the content quality of English text. In the AGM, LSA represents the meaning of words as vectors in semantic space using statistical analysis technique applied to large corpus, and TC is applied to classify the texts in the corpus into different categories. By comparing the similarity of a text with reference texts which are belong to the same cluster on basis of semantic content, our model can grade the text in the same cluster. In addition, the AGM can judge the to-be-graded text whether related to the given subject. Our experiments show that the AGM is competent in grading the content of texts.
This work is supported by the Educational Science & Research Foundation of Guangxi (No.200911MS83).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Foltz, P.W., Laham, D., Landauer, T.K.: The Intelligent Essay Assessor: Applications to Educational Technology, http://imej.wfu.edu/articles/1999/2/04.htm (1999-02-04)
Landauer, T., Foltz, P.W., Laham, D.: Introduction to Latent Semantic Analysis. Discourse Processes 25, 259–284 (1998)
Lemaire, B., Dessus, P.: A system to assess the semantic content of students essays. Journal of Educational Computing Research 24(3), 305–320 (2001)
Deerwester, S., Dumais, S.T., Furnas, G.W., Landauer, T.K., Harshman, R.: Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 41(6), 391–407 (1990)
Debra, T.H., Pete, T., Anne, D.R., Marian, P.: Seeing the Whole Picture Evaluating Automated Assessment Systems. Journal of Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences 6(4), 203–224 (2007)
Fridolin, W., Christina, S., Gerald, S., Yoseba, P., Gustaf, N.: Factors Influencing Effectiveness in Automated Essay Scoring with LSA. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 125, 947–949 (2005)
Steinbach, M., Karypis, G., Kumar, V.: A Comparison of Document Clustering Techniques, Technical Report, 00-034 2000
Gautam, B.P., Shrestha, D., Members Iaeng: Document Clustering Through Non-Negative Matrix Factorization: A Case Study of Hadoop for Computational Time Reduction of Large Scale Documents. In: Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, vol. I, pp. 570-575 (2010)
Savaresi, S.M., Boley, D.L.: A comparative analysis on the bisecting K-means and the PDDP clustering algorithms. Intelligent Data Analysis 6, 1–18 (2002)
Ward Jr., J.H.: Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58(301), 244–263 (1963)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Guimin, H., Guoyuan, C., Ya, Z., Kuangyu, Q., Yan, Z. (2011). An Automated Grading Model Integrated LSA and Text Clustering Together for English Text. In: Zhiguo, G., Luo, X., Chen, J., Wang, F.L., Lei, J. (eds) Emerging Research in Web Information Systems and Mining. WISM 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 238. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24273-1_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24273-1_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24272-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24273-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)