Skip to main content

Communicative Inferences and Context of Interests

  • Conference paper
Modeling and Using Context (CONTEXT 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6967))

  • 898 Accesses

Abstract

The paper examines the determination of the explicit content of communication via inferential processes based on the speakers’ situational interests. The paper’s argument is based on the hypothesis that the meaning of natural language expressions depends on the situational extra-linguistic interests of speakers. It is maintained that interests affect the sentences of natural language when semantic conventions, semantic context, and pragmatic context are unable to determine a unique meaning for a sentence. In particular, the paper addresses the question of the determination of meaning via inference where the speaker’s interest is a premise for communicative inferences. The notion of interest is viewed as (preference for) a state of affairs which implies the possibility conditions of the agent’s goal. The context of interests is viewed as the set of states of affairs that make a sentence true and contemporaneously satisfy the situational interests of the speaker. The last part of the paper illustrates a real-life case of linguistic dispute.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bianchi, C.: Pragmatica cognitiva. I meccanismi della comunicazione, Laterza, Roma-Bari (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kaplan, D.: Demonstratives. An essay on semantics, logic, metaphysics, and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals. In: Almong, J., Perry, J., Wettstein, H. (eds.) Themes from Kaplan. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1977/1989)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kaplan, D.: Afterthoughts. In: Almong, J., Perry, J., Wettstein, H. (eds.) Themes from Kaplan. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bianchi, C.: Nobody loves me: quantification in context. Philosophical Studies 130(2), 377–397 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Perry, J.: Indexical and demonstratives. In: Hale, R., Wright, C. (eds.) Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Blackwell, Oxford (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bianchi, C.: Pragmatica del linguaggio, Laterza, Bari-Roma (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clark, H.H.: Arena’s of Language. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Searle, J.: The Background of meaning. In: Searle, J., Kiefer, F., Bierwisch, M. (eds.) Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics. Reidel, Dordrecht (1980)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Tarski, A.: The semantic conception of truth and the foundation of semantics. Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 4, 341–356 (1944)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Conte, R., Castelfranchi, C.: Cognitive and Social Action. University College London, London (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cruciani, M.: On the notion of intended meaning. In: Ohlsson, S., Catrambone, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 32th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1028–1033. Cognitive Science Society, Austin (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cruciani, M.: Significato inteso, stati di cose e livello esplicito della comunicazione. Sistemi Intelligenti XXII 3, 505–513 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cruciani, M.: Intended meaning and situational interest. In: Taatgen, N., van Rijn, H. (eds.) Proceedings of the 31th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 2747–2752. Cognitive Science Society, Austin (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cruciani, M.: Cono del linguaggio, negoziazione degli interessi e significato inteso di clausole contrattuali ambigue. Sistemi Intelligenti XXI 3, 473–488 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Travis, C.: Saying and Understanding. Blackwell, Oxford (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Travis, C.: The True and False: The Domain of Pragmatics. Benjamins, Amsterdam (1981)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Searle, J.: Expression and Meaning. University Press Cambridge, Cambridge (1979)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Grice, P.: Studies The Way of Words. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sperber, D., Wilson, D.: Relevance Theory: Communication and Cognition. Blackwell, Oxford (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Carston, R.: Implicature, explicature and truth-theoretic semantics. In: Kempson, R. (ed.) Mental Representations. Interface Between Language and Reality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Carston, R.: Linguistic meaning, communicated meaning and cognitive pragmatics. Mind and Language 17(1-2), 127–148 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Recanati, F.: The pragmatics of what is said. Mind Language 4(4), 207–232 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Recanati, F.: Direct Reference: From Language to Thought. Blackwell, Oxford (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bach, K.: Conversational impliciture. Mind Language 9(2), 124–162 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Travis, C.: Pragmatics. In: Hale, R., Wright, C. (eds.) A Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Blackwell, Oxford (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Levinson, S.: Presumptive meanings. The theory of generalized conversational implicature. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bianchi, C.: Semantics and pragmatics: distinction reloaded. In: Bianchi, C. (ed.) The Semantics/pragmatics Distinction. Stanford, Csli (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hobbs, J.R.: Abduction in Natural Language Understanding. In: Horn, L., Ward, G. (eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics. Blackwell, Oxford (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bouquet, P., Giunchiglia, F.: Reasoning about theory adequacy. A new solution to the qualification problem. Fundamenta Informaticae 23, 247–262 (1995)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Giunchiglia, F.: Contextual reasoning. Epistemologia 16, 345–364 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bouquet, P.: Contesti e ragionamento contestuale. Il ruolo del contesto in una teoria della rappresentazione della conoscenza. Genova, Pantograf (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cruciani, M. (2011). Communicative Inferences and Context of Interests. In: Beigl, M., Christiansen, H., Roth-Berghofer, T.R., Kofod-Petersen, A., Coventry, K.R., Schmidtke, H.R. (eds) Modeling and Using Context. CONTEXT 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6967. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24279-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24279-3_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24278-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24279-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics