Skip to main content

Bipolar Queries: Some Inspirations from Intention and Preference Modeling

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Combining Experimentation and Theory

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 271))

Abstract

The concept of a bipolar query, meant as a database query that involves both mandatory and optional conditions is discussed from the point of view of flexible database querying and modeling of more sophisticated user’s intentions and preferences. Aggregation of the matching degrees against the negative and positive conditions to derive an overall matching degree is considered taking as the point of departure the Lacroix and Lavency approach [25] for bipolar queries. It is shown that the use of a multiple valued logic based formalism for the representation of positive and negative desires in the context of intention modeling proposed by Casali, Godo and Sierra [8, 7] can be employed to extend the approach to bipolar queries. Both the approaches have roots in the seminal Dubois and Prade’s view of bipolarity in the possibilistic setting (cf. for a comprehensive review Dubois and Prade [17]).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Kaci, S., Prade, H.: Bipolar possibility theory in preference modeling: Representation, fusion and optimal solutions. Information Fusion 7, 135–150 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Benferhat, S., Kaci, S.: Towards a possibilistic logic handling of preferences. Applied Intelligence 14, 303–317 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bordogna, G., Pasi, G.: Linguistic aggregation operators of selection criteria in fuzzy information retrieval. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 10(2), 233–248 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bosc, P., Pivert, O.: Discriminated answers and databases: fuzzy sets as a unifying expression means. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), San Diego, USA, pp. 745–752 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bosc, P., Pivert, O.: An approach for a hierarchical aggregation of fuzzy predicates. In: Proceedings of the Second IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE1993), San Francisco, USA, p. 1231 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bosc, P., Pivert, O.: SQLf: A relational database language for fuzzy querying. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 3(1), 1–17 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Casali, A., Godo, L., Sierra, C.: g-BDI: A Graded Intensional Agent Model for Practical Reasoning. In: Torra, V., Narukawa, Y., Inuiguchi, M. (eds.) MDAI 2009. LNCS, vol. 5861, pp. 5–20. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Casali, A., Godo, L., Sierra, C.: A Logical Framework to Represent and Reason about Graded Preferences and Intentions. In: Brewka, G., Lang, J. (eds.) Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference, KR 2008, Sydney, Australia, pp. 27–37. AAAI Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chomicki, J.: Querying with Intrinsic Preferences. In: Jensen, C.S., Jeffery, K., Pokorný, J., Šaltenis, S., Hwang, J., Böhm, K., Jarke, M. (eds.) EDBT 2002. LNCS, vol. 2287, pp. 34–51. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.: Intention is choice with commitment. Artificial Intelligence 42, 213–261 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. De Tré, G., Zadrożny, S., Bronselaer, A.: Handling bipolarity in elementary queries to possibilistic databases. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Sets 18(3), 599–612 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. De Tré, G., Zadrożny, S., Matthé, T., Kacprzyk, J., Bronselaer, A.: Dealing with Positive and Negative Query Criteria in Fuzzy Database Querying. In: Andreasen, T., Yager, R.R., Bulskov, H., Christiansen, H., Larsen, H.L. (eds.) FQAS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5822, pp. 593–604. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Default reasoning and possibility theory. Artificial Intelligence 35(2), 243–257 (1988)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Using fuzzy sets in flexible querying: why and how? In: Andreasen, T., Christiansen, H., Larsen, H. (eds.) Flexible Query Answering Systems, pp. 45–60. Kluwer Academic Publishers (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: FQAS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2522, pp. 174–182. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Handling bipolar queries in fuzzy information processing, in: Galindo [20], pp. 97–114

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: An overview of the asymmetric bipolar representation of positive and negative information in possibility theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 160(10), 1355–1366 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Dujmović, J.: Partial absorption function. Journal of the University of Belgrade, EE Dept. 659, 156–163 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fodor, J., Roubens, M.: Fuzzy Preference Modelling and Multicriteria Decision Support, Series D: System Theory. Knowledge Engineering and Problem Solving (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Galindo, J. (ed.): Handbook of Research on Fuzzy Information Processing in Databases, Information Science Reference, New York, USA (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Grabisch, M., Greco, S., Pirlot, M.: Bipolar and bivariate models in multicriteria decision analysis: Descriptive and constructive approaches. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 23, 930–969 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Hájek, P.: Metamathematics of Fuzzy Logic. Kluwer, Dordrecht(1998)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Kacprzyk, J., Zadrożny, S.: Computing with words in intelligent database querying: standalone and internet-based applications. Information Sciences 134(1-4), 71–109 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Kacprzyk, J., Zadrożny, S.: FQUERY for Access: fuzzy querying for a windows-based DBMS. In: Bosc, P., Kacprzyk, J. (eds.) Fuzziness in Database Management Systems, pp. 415–433. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lacroix, M., Lavency, P.: Preferences: Putting more knowledge into queries. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Very Large Databases, Brighton, UK, pp. 217–225 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mesiar, R., Thiele, H.: On T-Quantifiers and S-Quantifiers. In: Novak, V., Perfilieva, I. (eds.) Discovering the World with Fuzzy Logic, pp. 310–326. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: Modeling Rational Agents within a BDI-Architecture. In: Allen, J., Fikes, R., Sandewall, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 1991), pp. 473–484. Morgan Kaufmann (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: BDI Agents: From Theory to Practice. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 1995), pp. 312–319 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tudorie, C.: Qualifying objects in classical relational database querying. In: Galindo [20], pp. 218–245

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yager, R.: Higher structures in multi-criteria decision making. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 36, 553–570 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yager, R.: Fuzzy logic in the formulation of decision functions from linguistic specifications. Kybernetes 25(4), 119–130 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Zadrożny, S.: Bipolar Queries Revisited. In: Torra, V., Narukawa, Y., Miyamoto, S. (eds.) MDAI 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3558, pp. 387–398. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Zadrożny, S., Kacprzyk, J.: Bipolar queries and queries with preferences. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications, DEXA 1999, pp. 415–419. IEEE Comp. Soc., Poland (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Zadrożny, S., Kacprzyk, J. (eds.): Bipolar queries using various interpretations of logical connectives. LNCS, pp. 181–190 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Yorke, M.: Bipolarity or not? Some conceptual problems related to bipolar rating [1]. British Educational Research Journal 27(2), 171–186

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janusz Kacprzyk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kacprzyk, J., Zadrożny, S. (2012). Bipolar Queries: Some Inspirations from Intention and Preference Modeling. In: Trillas, E., Bonissone, P., Magdalena, L., Kacprzyk, J. (eds) Combining Experimentation and Theory. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 271. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24666-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24666-1_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24665-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24666-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics