Skip to main content

Towards Directly Applied Ontological Constraints in a Semantic Decision Table

  • Conference paper
Rule-Based Modeling and Computing on the Semantic Web (RuleML 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 7018))

Abstract

Decision tables have been a powerful tool for business people since a long time ago. A semantic decision table (SDT) is a decision table properly annotated with domain ontologies. It contains a set of formal agreements called commitments, which is a result from group decision making processes involving a community of business stakeholders. In this paper, we focus on validation and verification issues (V&V) for SDT. In particular, we deal with directly applied ontological constraints that are stored as SDT commitments. With them, we can detect inconsistency in an SDT. We also show how an SDT commitment can be stored in Semantic Decision Rule Markup Language (SDRule-ML). In the meanwhile, we illustrate the mapping between SDRule-ML and RDFs/OWL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. CSA: Z243.1-1970 for Decision Tables, Canadian Standards Association (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Halpin, T., Morgan, T.: Information Modeling and Relational Databases, 2nd edn. The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Data Management Systems. Morgan Kaufmann (March 17, 2008) ISBN-10: 0123735688, ISBN-13: 978-0123735683

    Google Scholar 

  3. Henry Beitz, E., Buck, N.H., Jorgensen, P.C., Larson, L., Maes, R., Marselos, N.L., Muntz, C., Rabin, J., Reinwald, L.T., Verhelst, M.: A modern appraisal of decision tables, a Codasyl report. ACM, New York (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hewett, R., Leuchner, J.: Restructuring decision tables for elucidation of knowledge. Data & Knowledge Engineering 46(3), 271–290 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ibramsha, M., Rajaraman, V.: Detection of logical errors in decision table programs. Communications of the ACM 21(12) (December 1978)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lew, A.: Optimal conversion of extended-entry decision tables with general cost criteria. Communications of the ACM 21(4) (April 1978)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Murrell, S.T., Plant, R.: A survey of tools for the validation and verification of knowledge-based systems: 1985-1995. Journal of DS Sys. 21(4), 307–323 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pooch, U.W.: Translation of Decision Tables. Journal of ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) Surveys 6(2) (June 1974)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Qian, Y., Liang, J., Li, D., Wang, F., Ma, N.: Approximation reduction in inconsistent incomplete decision tables. Knowledge-Based Systems 23(5) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shwayder, K.: Combining decision rules in a decision table. Communications of the ACM 18(8) (August 1975)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tang, Y.: Directly Applied ORM Constraints for Validating and Verifying Semantic Decision Tables. In: Proc. of OTM 2011 (upcoming, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tang, Y., Meersman, R.: Towards Building Semantic Decision Tables with Domain Ontologies. In: Chan, M.C., et al. (eds.) Challenges in Information Technology Management. World Scientific (2008) ISBN 978-981-281-906-2, 981-281-906-1

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tang, Y., Meersman, R.: SDRule Markup Language: Towards Modeling and Interchanging Ontological Commitments for Semantic Decision Making. In: Handbook of Research on Emerging Rule-Based Languages and Technologies: Open Solutions and Approaches. IGI Publishing, USA (2009) ISBN: 1-60566-402-2

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tang, Y., Debruyne, C., Criel, J.: Onto-DIY: A Flexible and Idea Inspiring Ontology-based Do-It-Yourself Architecture for Managing Data Semantics and Semantic Data. In: Meersman, R., Dillon, T., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6427, pp. 1036–1043. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Vanthienen, J., Mues, C., Aerts, A.: An Illustration of Verification and Validation in the Modeling Phase of KBS development. Journal of Data & Knowledge Engineering 27(3), 337–352 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tang, Y., Meersman, R. (2011). Towards Directly Applied Ontological Constraints in a Semantic Decision Table. In: Olken, F., Palmirani, M., Sottara, D. (eds) Rule-Based Modeling and Computing on the Semantic Web. RuleML 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7018. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24908-2_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24908-2_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24907-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24908-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics