Skip to main content

Noise Reduction in Essay Datasets for Automated Essay Grading

  • Conference paper
On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2011 Workshops (OTM 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7046))

Abstract

Marking of a huge number of essays is a very burdensome and tedious task for the teacher and/or trainer. Studies have shown that their efficiency decreases significantly when continuously marking essays over a given period of time. An Automated Essay Grading (AEG) system would be most desirable in such a scenario to reduce the workload of the teacher and/or trainer and to increase the efficiency of the marking process. Almost all the existing AEG systems assume that the relationship between the features of the essay and the essay grade is linear, which may not necessarily be the case. In cases where the relationship between the feature vector and the essay grade is non-linear, none of the existing methods provides a mechanism to capture that and determine an accurate essay grade. This paper proposes a new AEG system, the OzEgrader, that aims to capture both the linear and non-linear relationships between the essay features and its grade, and explains the methodology for noise reduction in the essay dataset.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hardy, R.A.: Examining the cost of performance assessment. Applied Measurement in Education 8, 121–134 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Valenti, S., Neri, F., Cucchiarelli, A.: An overview of current research on automated essay grading. Journal of Information Technology Education 2, 319–330 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stalnaker, J.M.: The problem of the English examination. Education Record 17, 41 (1936)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rudner, L., Gagne., P.: An overview of three approaches to scoring written essays by computer. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 7(26) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kakkonen, T.: Computer Assisted Assessment of Essays. Department of Computer Science, Master’s. University of Joensuu, Finland (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Page, E.B., Petersen, N.S.: The computer moves into essay grading. Phi Delta Kappa 76(7), 561–565 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Page, E.B.: Computer grading of student prose, using modern concepts and software. Journal of Experimental Education 62, 127–142 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Darus, S., Stapa, S., Hussin, S.: Experimenting a Computer-Based Essay Marking System at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Jurnal Teknologi 39(E), 1–18 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Haswell, R.H.: Automated text-checkers: A chronology and a bibliography of commentary. Computers and Composition Online (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Burstein, J.: The e-rater scoring engine: Automated Essay Scoring with natural language processing. In: Shermis, M.D., Burstein, J.C. (eds.) Automated Essay Scoring: A Cross Disciplinary Approach. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rudner, L.M., Liang, T.: Automated essay scoring using Bayes’ Theorem. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment 1(2), 3–21 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Page, E.B.: The imminence of grading essays by computer. Phi Delta Kappa 47, 238–243 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Burstein, J., Leacock, C., Swartz, R.: Automated evaluation of essay and short answers. In: Danson, M. (ed.) Sixth International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference. Loughborough University, Loughborough (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kakkonen, T., Myller, N., Suttinen, E., Timonen, J.: Comparison of Dimension Reduction Methods for Automated Essay Grading. Educational Technology & Society 11(3), 275–288 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Landauer, T.K., Laham, D., Rehder, B., Schreiner, M.E.: How well can passage meaning be derived without using word order? A comparison of Latent Semantic Analysis and humans. In: Conference How Well Can Passage Meaning Be Derived without Using Word Order? A Comparison of Latent Semantic Analysis and Humans, pp. 412–417. Erlbaum (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Whittington, D., Hunt, H.: Approaches to the computerized assessment of free text responses. In: Danson, M. (ed.) Sixth International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference. Loughborough University, UK (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mitchell, T., Russel, T., Broomhead, P., Aldridge, N.: Towards robust computerized marking of free-text responses. In: Danson, M. (ed.) Sixth International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference. Loughborough University, Loughborough (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Johnson, R.: Elementary Statistics. PWS-Kent Publishers (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yang, Y.: An evaluation of statistical approaches to text categorization. Carnegie Mellon University (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Christie, J.R.: Automated essay marking-for both style and content. In: Danson, M. (ed.) Third Annual Computer Assisted Assessment Conference. Loughborough University, Loughborough (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ming, P.Y., Mikhailov, A.A., Kuan, T.L.: Intelligent Essay Marking System. Learners Together (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mason, O., Stephenson, I.-G.: Automated free text marking with Paperless School. In: Danson, M. (ed.) Sixth International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference. Loughborough University, Loughborough (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dikli, S.: An overview of automated scoring of essays. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment 5(1) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Williams, R., Dreher, H.: Automatically grading essays with Markit©. Journal of Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology 1, 693–700 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Futagi, Y.: The effects of learner errors on the development of a collocation detection tool. In: Fourth Workshop on Analytics for Noisy Unstructured Text Data, pp. 27–34. ACM, Toronto (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Department of Education: Narrative Marking Guide 2010, National Assessment Program-Literacy and Numeracy. Government of Western Australia (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dillon, T.S., Niebur, D.: Neural networks applications in power systems. CRL Publishing Ltd., Market Harborough, UK (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fazal, A., Dillon, T., Chang, E. (2011). Noise Reduction in Essay Datasets for Automated Essay Grading. In: Meersman, R., Dillon, T., Herrero, P. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2011 Workshops. OTM 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7046. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25126-9_60

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25126-9_60

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25125-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25126-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics