Abstract
How can we increase acceptance and anthropomorphism of robots? In an experiment with N = 45 participants, we tested whether categorizing the humanoid robot NAO as an in-group member vs. an out-group member would result in more positive evaluations and higher levels of anthropomorphism of the robot NAO. Results fully support our hypotheses. Moreover, the present findings also indicate that sharing in-group membership with NAO led to greater willingness to interact with robots in general.
This research was funded by the German Research Council (COE 277).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Epley, N., Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J.T.: On Seeing Human: A Three-Factor Theory of Anthropomorphism. Psychol. Rev. 114, 864–886 (2007)
Luczak, H., Rötting, M., Schmidt, L.: Let’s Talk: Anthropomorphization as a Means to Cope with Stress of Interacting with Technical Devices. Ergonomics 46, 1361–1374 (2003)
Eyssel, F., Hegel, F.: (S)he’s got the Look: Gender Stereotyping of Social Robots. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. (accepted)
Hegel, F., Eyssel, F., Wrede, B.: The Social Robot Flobi: Key Concepts of Industrial Design. In: Proceedings of the 19th IEEE International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2010), pp. 120–125 (2010)
Eyssel, F., Hegel, F., Horstmann, G., Wagner, C.: Anthropomorphic Inferences from Emotional Nonverbal Cues: A Case Study. In: Proceedings of the 19th IEEE International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2010), pp. 681–686 (2010)
Duffy, B.R.: Anthropomorphism and the Social Robot. Robot. Auton. Syst. 42, 170–190 (2003)
Duffy, B.R.: Fundamental Issues in Affective Intelligent Social Machines. Open Artif. Int. J. 2, 21–34 (2008)
Mori, M.: The Buddha in the Robot. Charles E. Tuttle Co., Japan (1982)
Tajfel, H., Billig, M.G., Bundy, R.P., Flament, C.: Social Categorization and Intergroup Behavior. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 1, 149–178 (1971)
Tajfel, H., Turner, J.C.: An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. In: Austin, W.G., Worchel, S. (eds.) The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, pp. 33–47. Brooks/Cole, Oxford, England (1979)
Gaertner, S.L., Dovidio, J.F.: Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model. Psychol. Press, New York (2000)
Jackson, L.A., Hodge, C.N., Gerard, D.A., Ingram, J.M., Ervin, K.S., Sheppard, L.A.: Cognition, Affect, and Behavior in the Prediction of Group Attitudes. Pers. Soc. Psychol. B. 22, 306–316 (1996)
Haslam, N.: Dehumanization: An Integrative Review. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 10, 252–264 (2006)
Leyens, J.-P., Paladino, M.P., RodrÃguez-Torres, R., Vaes, J., Demoulin, S., RodrÃguez-Pérez, A., et al.: The Emotional Side of Prejudice: The Attribution of Secondary Emotions to Ingroups and Outgroups. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 4, 186–197 (2000)
Leyens, J.-P., Rodriguez, A.P., Rodriguez, R.T., Gaunt, R., Paladino, P.M., Vaes, J., Demoulin, S.: Psychological Essentialism and the Attribution of Uniquely Human Emotions to Ingroups and Outgroups. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 31, 395–411 (2001)
Eyssel, F., Kuchenbrandt, D.: My Robot is More Human than Yours: Effects of Group Membership on Anthropomorphic Judgments of the Social Robot Flobi. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2011) (accepted)
Nass, C., Isbister, K., Lee, E.-J.: Truth is Beauty: Researching Embodied Conversational Agents. In: Cassells, J. (ed.) Embodied Conversational Agents, pp. 374–402. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)
Nass, C., Fogg, B.J., Moon, Y.: Can Computers be Teammates? Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Int. 45, 669–678 (1996)
Nass, C., Moon, Y.: Machines and mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers. J. Soc. Issues 56, 81–103 (2000)
Pierris, G., Dahl, T.S.: Compressed Sparse Code Hierarchical SOM on Learning and Reproducing Gestures in Humanoid Robots. In: Proceedings of the 19th IEEE International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2010), pp. 681–686 (2010)
Eyssel, F., Kuchenbrandt, D.: Manipulating Anthropomorphic Inferences about NAO: The Role of Situational and Dispositional Aspects of Effectance Motivation. In: Proceedings of the 20th IEEE International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2011), pp. 467–472 (2011)
Wittenbrink, B., Judd, C.M., Park, B.: Evaluative versus Conceptual Judgments in Automatic Stereotyping and Prejudice. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 37, 244–252 (2001)
Goette, L., Huffman, D., Meier, S.: The Impact of Group Membership on Cooperation and Norm Enforcement: Evidence using Random Assignment to Real Social Groups. The Am. Ec. Rev. 96, 212–216 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kuchenbrandt, D., Eyssel, F., Bobinger, S., Neufeld, M. (2011). Minimal Group - Maximal Effect? Evaluation and Anthropomorphization of the Humanoid Robot NAO. In: Mutlu, B., Bartneck, C., Ham, J., Evers, V., Kanda, T. (eds) Social Robotics. ICSR 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7072. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25504-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25504-5_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25503-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25504-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)