Abstract
A hedge is a linguistic device used to avoid using a categorical sentence. Hedges can be used to determine whether a sentence is factual by merely regarding a sentence containing hedges as non-factual. In this paper, we perform a comparative experiment of various classification methods for hedge detection. Among four different classification methods, we observe that SVM shows the best performance and that the SVM-based method finally outperforms the best system in the CoNLL2010-ST task.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lakoff, G.: Hedges: a study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Chicago Linguistics Society Papers 8, 183–228 (1972)
Hyland, K.: Persuasion, interaction and the construction of knowledge: representing self and others in research writing. International Journal of English Studies 8(2), 8–18 (2008)
Light, M., Qiu, X.Y., Srinivasan, P.: The language of bioscience: facts, speculations, and statements in between. In: Proceedings of BioLINK 2004: Linking Biological Literature, Ontologies and Databases, pp. 17–24 (2004)
Medlock, B., Briscoe, T.: Weakly supervised learning for hedge classification in scientific literature. In: Proceedings of 45th Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 992–999 (2007)
Szarvas, G.: Hedge classification in biomedical texts with a weakly supervised selection of keywords. In: Proceedings of 46th Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 281–289 (2008)
Morante, R., Daelemans, W.: Learning the scope of hedge cues in biomedical texts. In: Proceedings of the BioNLP 2009 Workshop, pp. 28–36 (2009)
Farkas, R., Vincze, V., Mora, G., Csirik, J., Szarvas, G.: The CoNLL 2010 Shared Task: Learning to Detect Hedges and their Scope in Natural Language Text. In: Proceedings of the Shared Task, 14th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, Sweden, pp. 1–12 (2010)
Tang, B., Wang, X., Yuan, B., Fan, S.: A Cascade Method for Detecting Hedges and their Scope in Natural Language Text. In: Proceedings of the Shared Task, 14th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, Sweden, pp. 13–17 (2010)
Li, X., Shen, J., Gao, X., Wang, X.: Exploiting Rich Features for Detecting Hedges and Their Scope. In: Proceedings of the Shared Task, 14th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, Sweden, pp. 78–83 (2010)
Zhou, H., Li, X., Huang, D., Li, Z., Yang, Y.: Exploiting Multi-Features to Detect Hedges and Their Scope in Biomedical Texts. In: Proceedings of the Shared Task, 14th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, Sweden, pp. 106–113 (2010)
Sang, T.K., Veenstra, J.: Representing Text Chunks. In: Proc. of EACL 1999, pp. 173–179 (1999)
Tsuruoka, Y., Tateishi, Y., Kim, J.-D., Ohta, T., McNaught, J., Ananiadou, S., Tsujii, J.: Developing a Robust Part-of-Speech Tagger for Biomedical Text. In: Bozanis, P., Houstis, E.N. (eds.) PCI 2005. LNCS, vol. 3746, pp. 382–392. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kang, SJ., Kang, IS., Na, SH. (2011). A Comparison of Classifiers for Detecting Hedges. In: Kim, Th., et al. U- and E-Service, Science and Technology. UNESST 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 264. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27210-3_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27210-3_32
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27209-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27210-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)