Skip to main content

A Multimedia Retrieval Framework Based on Automatic Graded Relevance Judgments

  • Conference paper
Advances in Multimedia Modeling (MMM 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7131))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Traditional Content Based Multimedia Retrieval (CBMR) systems measure the relevance of visual samples using a binary scale (Relevant/Non Relevant). However, a picture can be relevant to a semantic category with different degrees, depending on the way such concept is represented in the image. In this paper, we build a CBMR framework that supports graded relevance judgments. In order to quickly build graded ground truths, we propose a measure to reassess binary-labeled databases without involving manual effort: we automatically assign a reliable relevance degree (Non, Weakly, Average, Very Relevant) to each sample, based on its position with respect to the hyperplane drawn by support vector machines in the feature space. We test the effectiveness of our system on two large-scale databases, and we show that our approach outperforms the traditional binary relevance-based frameworks in both scene recognition and video retrieval.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ayache, S., Quénot, G.: Trecvid 2007 collaborative annotation using active learning. In: Proceedings of the TRECVID 2007 Workshop (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boser, B.E., Guyon, I.M., Vapnik, V.N.: A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, pp. 144–152. ACM (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Elleuch, N., Zarka, M., Feki, I., Ammar, A.B., Alimi, A.: Regimvid at trecvid 2010: Semantic indexing. In: Proceedings of the TRECVID 2010 Workshop (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Freund, Y., Iyer, R., Schapire, R.E., Singer, Y.: An efficient boosting algorithm for combining preferences. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 4, 933–969 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Ji, Z., Lu, B.-L.: Gender Classification Based on Support Vector Machine with Automatic Confidence. In: Leung, C.S., Lee, M., Chan, J.H. (eds.) ICONIP 2009, Part I. LNCS, vol. 5863, pp. 685–692. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Kekäläinen, J.: Binary and graded relevance in ir evaluations–comparison of the effects on ranking of ir systems. Information processing & management 41(5), 1019–1033 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kelly, D., Teevan, J.: Implicit feedback for inferring user preference: a bibliography. SIGIR Forum 37, 18–28 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lin, C., Wang, S.: Training algorithms for fuzzy support vector machines with noisy data. Pattern Recognition Letters 25(14), 1647–1656 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lin, C.F., Wang, S.D.: Fuzzy support vector machines. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 13(2), 464–471 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lowe, D.G.: Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision 60(2), 91–110 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Papageorgiou, C.P., Oren, M., Poggio, T.: A General Framework for Object Detection. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision, p. 555. IEEE Computer Society (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Paterno, M.C.S., Lim, F.S., Leow, W.K.: Fuzzy semantic labeling for image retrieval. In: 2004 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, ICME 2004, vol. 2, pp. 767–770. IEEE (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Platt, J.: Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines. In: Bartlett, P., Schoelkopf, B., Schurmans, D., Smola, A.J. (eds.) Advances in Large Margin Classifiers, pp. 61–74

    Google Scholar 

  14. Redi, M., Merialdo, B., Wang, F.: Eurecom and ecnu at trecvid 2010: The semantic indexing task. In: Proceedings of the TRECVID 2010 Workshop (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Redi, M., Merialdo, B.: Saliency moments for image categorization. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval, ICMR 2011, pp. 39:1–39:8. ACM, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Saracevic, T.: Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. part iii: Behavior and effects of relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58(13), 2126–2144 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Smeaton, A.F., Over, P., Kraaij, W.: Evaluation campaigns and trecvid. In: MIR 2006: Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Workshop on Multimedia Information Retrieval, pp. 321–330. ACM Press, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Snow, R., O’Connor, B., Jurafsky, D., Ng, A.Y.: Cheap and fast—but is it good?: evaluating non-expert annotations for natural language tasks. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 254–263. Association for Computational Linguistics (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sormunen, E.: Liberal relevance criteria of trec-: counting on negligible documents? In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 324–330. ACM (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stricker, M.A., Orengo, M.: Similarity of color images. In: Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 2420, p. 381 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Svore, K., Vanderwende, L., Burges, C.: Enhancing single-document summarization by combining ranknet and third-party sources. In: Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL), pp. 448–457 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Won, C.S., Park, D.K., Park, S.J.: Efficient use of MPEG-7 edge histogram descriptor. Etri Journal 24(1), 23–30 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zheng, Z., Chen, K., Sun, G., Zha, H.: A regression framework for learning ranking functions using relative relevance judgments. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 287–294. ACM (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Redi, M., Merialdo, B. (2012). A Multimedia Retrieval Framework Based on Automatic Graded Relevance Judgments. In: Schoeffmann, K., Merialdo, B., Hauptmann, A.G., Ngo, CW., Andreopoulos, Y., Breiteneder, C. (eds) Advances in Multimedia Modeling. MMM 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7131. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27355-1_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27355-1_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27354-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27355-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics